Testing/CI/tooling consistency (#9,#20,#21,#22,#23,#28) (#59)
Co-authored-by: claude <claude@jpaul.io> Co-committed-by: claude <claude@jpaul.io>
This commit was merged in pull request #59.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -234,10 +234,13 @@ seen, producing all four parts without you listing the steps.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git log --oneline add-command.md # the procedure's own history
|
||||
git diff HEAD~1 add-command.md # if you tightened it in Part C — your workflow change as a diff
|
||||
git log -p -- add-command.md # full patch history: the file's creation, plus the Part C tighten if you made one
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
That diff *is* a change to how your team adds commands — readable, attributable, revertable. In a
|
||||
(`git log -p` surfaces the skill's own patches no matter what you committed *after* tightening it —
|
||||
unlike `git diff HEAD~1`, which would be empty here because the most recent commit added the second
|
||||
*command*, not a change to the skill.) Each entry in that history *is* a change to how your team adds
|
||||
commands — readable, attributable, revertable. In a
|
||||
team repo (Modules 8, 11) it reaches everyone on `git pull`; behind review (Module 10) it lands as a
|
||||
PR someone approves. You've turned a procedure you used to narrate into a versioned capability.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user