docs: sort Prerequisites lists numerically ascending (#100)
CI / check (pull_request) Successful in 6s

Reorder the `## Prerequisites` bullets in 9 modules so prior modules
are listed lowest number first instead of by pedagogical importance or
at random. A trailing "Helpful but not required" group stays last and
is sorted within itself; multi-module bullets sort by their lowest
number. Intro/closing paragraphs are left in place. Prose is unchanged;
only bullet order moves.

Modules touched: 7, 9, 14, 15, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27. The other 18 modules
were already ascending (or have one/zero prereqs) and are untouched.
Module 19's "Helpful but not required: Module 16" correctly trails its
ascending 8/14/18 main list, so it stays as is.

Closes #100

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CamgR4HaVpfaqUViuHUcWw
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-23 09:53:05 -04:00
parent edf3f34336
commit 65c6c6b2b6
9 changed files with 49 additions and 49 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -13,12 +13,12 @@ This is the closer. It assumes the whole course, but it leans hardest on:
- **Module 1**: the thesis (the model is the cheap, swappable part; the workflow is the durable
skill) and the `tasks-app` we've carried the whole way. This module is where the thesis gets its
proof.
- **Module 10, Reviewing Code You Didn't Write**: the human review skill evals partially automate
and partially *replace* once a human isn't in the loop.
- **Module 13, Testing in the AI Era**: you can write a deterministic pass/fail check. Evals are
the next thing up the ladder: scoring output that a single test can't fully pin down.
- **Module 14, Continuous Integration**: running checks automatically on every change, with an
exit code that gates. Evals run the same way and gate the same way.
- **Module 10, Reviewing Code You Didn't Write**: the human review skill evals partially automate
and partially *replace* once a human isn't in the loop.
- **Modules 2426, the Unit 5 agent ladder**: assistive agents (24), autonomous-but-supervised
agents (25), and orchestrated fleets (26). Evals are what decide how far up that ladder any given
agent is allowed to climb.