This commit was merged in pull request #105.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ Let it edit `tasks.py` and `cli.py` freely. This is a multi-file change: exactly
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git diff # read what it actually changed
|
||||
python cli.py add "ship module 6" --priority high
|
||||
python cli.py add "water plants" --priority low
|
||||
python cli.py list # see if priorities work and sort
|
||||
python3 cli.py add "ship module 6" --priority high
|
||||
python3 cli.py add "water plants" --priority low
|
||||
python3 cli.py list # see if priorities work and sort
|
||||
git add .
|
||||
git commit -m "Add task priorities (experiment)"
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ The payoff: prove the isolation. Switch back to `main` and watch the whole featu
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git switch main
|
||||
python cli.py list # no priorities: main is exactly as you left it
|
||||
python3 cli.py list # no priorities: main is exactly as you left it
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Sit with that for a second. Your bold change exists *only* on the branch. `main` never saw it. That's the entire point of the module in two commands.
|
||||
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ Sit with that for a second. Your bold change exists *only* on the branch. `main`
|
||||
git switch main
|
||||
git merge experiment/priorities # likely a fast-forward: main slides up to the branch
|
||||
git log --oneline --graph # straight line = fast-forward
|
||||
python cli.py list # the feature is now on main
|
||||
python3 cli.py list # the feature is now on main
|
||||
git branch -d experiment/priorities # branch did its job; -d is the safe delete
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ Most merges just work; Git is genuinely good at combining changes that touch *di
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
<<<<<<< HEAD
|
||||
print("usage: python cli.py [add <title> | list | done <index> | purge]")
|
||||
print("usage: python3 cli.py [add <title> | list | done <index> | purge]")
|
||||
=======
|
||||
print("usage: python cli.py [add <title> | list | done <index> | stats]")
|
||||
print("usage: python3 cli.py [add <title> | list | done <index> | stats]")
|
||||
>>>>>>> feature/stats
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ It resolves silently and the merge lands. And here is the only part that's still
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git diff HEAD~1 # what the merge actually changed; confirm no markers, both commands present
|
||||
python cli.py # run it: see the merged usage string
|
||||
python cli.py stats && python cli.py purge # both actually work
|
||||
python3 cli.py # run it: see the merged usage string
|
||||
python3 cli.py stats && python3 cli.py purge # both actually work
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
That `git diff` after *every* merge is the whole skill now. Not "edit the markers by hand," which the AI did for you before you could blink, but "know a conflict can happen and check the silent resolution," because a resolution that runs cleanly can still be wrong and it won't leave an error behind to warn you. (And if your AI's edits didn't happen to collide (they're nondeterministic), the course ships a little `make-conflict.sh` helper that manufactures one deterministically so you can still see the markers at least once.)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user