Module 9's "You'll need" says the repo will have "issues enabled (they are by default on every forge named in Module 8)." That is false for several Module 8 forges: Bitbucket Cloud's issue tracker is off by default, Azure DevOps has no Issues feature (it uses Boards/Work Items), and SourceHut uses a separately provisioned todo.sr.ht tracker. A learner on Bitbucket/Azure hits a missing-feature wall the text says cannot happen — and it contradicts Module 9's own earlier caveat that "the feature set varies."
Evidence
modules/09-issues-and-the-task-layer/README.md (~lines 237-238): "with issues enabled (they are by default on every forge named in Module 8)."
Contradicts the same module (~lines 50-51): "GitHub Issues, GitLab Issues, … Azure Boards — the feature set varies."
Module 8 names Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and SourceHut among its forges.
Why it matters
Breaks the vendor-agnostic ("GitHub is the default, not the requirement") and honesty-about-limits promises for learners who took the course's actively-encouraged forge-agnostic path, plus the load-bearing M8→M9 dependency.
Proposed change
Soften to match the line-50 caveat, e.g.: "Most forges enable issues by default; on a few you may need to turn the tracker on first — Bitbucket Cloud's tracker is off until enabled, Azure DevOps uses Boards/Work Items instead of Issues, and SourceHut uses a separate todo.sr.ht tracker."
Acceptance criteria
Module 9 no longer claims issues are on by default on every Module 8 forge.
Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and SourceHut exceptions are named.
The statement is consistent with the line-50 "feature set varies" caveat.
Affected files
modules/09-issues-and-the-task-layer/README.md
References
Source finding F24 (realVotes 3/3).
Filed from an adversarial multi-agent course review (217 raw findings → 54 adversarially-verified survivors). Scoped for manual review; intentionally not auto-assigned to an agent.
## Problem
Module 9's "You'll need" says the repo will have "issues enabled (they are by default on every forge named in Module 8)." That is false for several Module 8 forges: Bitbucket Cloud's issue tracker is off by default, Azure DevOps has no Issues feature (it uses Boards/Work Items), and SourceHut uses a separately provisioned `todo.sr.ht` tracker. A learner on Bitbucket/Azure hits a missing-feature wall the text says cannot happen — and it contradicts Module 9's own earlier caveat that "the feature set varies."
## Evidence
`modules/09-issues-and-the-task-layer/README.md` (~lines 237-238): "with issues enabled (they are by default on every forge named in Module 8)."
Contradicts the same module (~lines 50-51): "GitHub Issues, GitLab Issues, … Azure Boards — the feature set varies."
Module 8 names Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and SourceHut among its forges.
## Why it matters
Breaks the vendor-agnostic ("GitHub is the default, not the requirement") and honesty-about-limits promises for learners who took the course's actively-encouraged forge-agnostic path, plus the load-bearing M8→M9 dependency.
## Proposed change
Soften to match the line-50 caveat, e.g.: "Most forges enable issues by default; on a few you may need to turn the tracker on first — Bitbucket Cloud's tracker is off until enabled, Azure DevOps uses Boards/Work Items instead of Issues, and SourceHut uses a separate `todo.sr.ht` tracker."
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] Module 9 no longer claims issues are on by default on *every* Module 8 forge.
- [ ] Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and SourceHut exceptions are named.
- [ ] The statement is consistent with the line-50 "feature set varies" caveat.
## Affected files
- `modules/09-issues-and-the-task-layer/README.md`
## References
Source finding F24 (realVotes 3/3).
---
*Filed from an adversarial multi-agent course review (217 raw findings → 54 adversarially-verified survivors). Scoped for manual review; intentionally not auto-assigned to an agent.*
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Problem
Module 9's "You'll need" says the repo will have "issues enabled (they are by default on every forge named in Module 8)." That is false for several Module 8 forges: Bitbucket Cloud's issue tracker is off by default, Azure DevOps has no Issues feature (it uses Boards/Work Items), and SourceHut uses a separately provisioned
todo.sr.httracker. A learner on Bitbucket/Azure hits a missing-feature wall the text says cannot happen — and it contradicts Module 9's own earlier caveat that "the feature set varies."Evidence
modules/09-issues-and-the-task-layer/README.md(~lines 237-238): "with issues enabled (they are by default on every forge named in Module 8)."Contradicts the same module (~lines 50-51): "GitHub Issues, GitLab Issues, … Azure Boards — the feature set varies."
Module 8 names Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and SourceHut among its forges.
Why it matters
Breaks the vendor-agnostic ("GitHub is the default, not the requirement") and honesty-about-limits promises for learners who took the course's actively-encouraged forge-agnostic path, plus the load-bearing M8→M9 dependency.
Proposed change
Soften to match the line-50 caveat, e.g.: "Most forges enable issues by default; on a few you may need to turn the tracker on first — Bitbucket Cloud's tracker is off until enabled, Azure DevOps uses Boards/Work Items instead of Issues, and SourceHut uses a separate
todo.sr.httracker."Acceptance criteria
Affected files
modules/09-issues-and-the-task-layer/README.mdReferences
Source finding F24 (realVotes 3/3).
Filed from an adversarial multi-agent course review (217 raw findings → 54 adversarially-verified survivors). Scoped for manual review; intentionally not auto-assigned to an agent.