Fix Module 9 worked-example issues that describe features already built in Modules 4/6 #40

New Issue

2026-06-22T14:23:57-04:00

claude commented

2026-06-22 14:23:57 -04:00

Problem

Module 9's lab runs against the carried-forward tasks-app, but two example issues describe already-implemented work. Issue 2 ("Add a delete command") was built and committed in Module 4 and falsely asserts the app has "only add, list, and done." Issue 3 ("Support task priorities") is framed as an undesigned open question, but Module 6's lab already implemented exactly those decisions (levels, --priority, list re-sort). A carry-forward learner sees these already present and is confused.

Evidence

modules/09-issues-and-the-task-layer/lab/example-issues.md (~lines 54-55): "There's no way to remove a task once added — only add, list, and done." Contradicted by Module 4 committing a delete command (verify.sh; README ~lines 353/401) and Module 6 implementing priorities.
(Note: Module 6's priorities/count/clear live on an experiment branch whose merge to main is conditional — so the delete contradiction is the strongest, and the count/clear claim should not be overstated.)

Why it matters

Factual contradictions within the course's own materials, against carry-forward integrity. The delete/priorities examples are load-bearing (reused in the README's routing-heuristic prose).

Proposed change

Minimum fix (preserves the worked examples):

Drop Issue 2's false absolute claim ("only add, list, and done / no way to remove a task").
Soften Issue 3's already-answered questions; frame the issues from the project's earlier state.
Add a one-line note that delete/priorities may already exist from earlier modules.
(Shipping a pinned starter-state snapshot like M10/M13 is awkward here because M9's lab runs against the learner's pushed forge repo, not a local snapshot.)

Acceptance criteria

Issue 2 no longer states the app lacks delete / has only add/list/done.
Issue 3 no longer presents already-implemented decisions as open questions.
A note acknowledges some features may already exist from earlier modules.

Affected files

modules/09-issues-and-the-task-layer/lab/example-issues.md (and README note if needed)

References

Source finding F23 (realVotes 3/3).

Filed from an adversarial multi-agent course review (217 raw findings → 54 adversarially-verified survivors). Scoped for manual review; intentionally not auto-assigned to an agent.

## Problem Module 9's lab runs against the carried-forward `tasks-app`, but two example issues describe already-implemented work. Issue 2 ("Add a delete command") was built and committed in Module 4 and falsely asserts the app has "only add, list, and done." Issue 3 ("Support task priorities") is framed as an undesigned open question, but Module 6's lab already implemented exactly those decisions (levels, `--priority`, list re-sort). A carry-forward learner sees these already present and is confused. ## Evidence `modules/09-issues-and-the-task-layer/lab/example-issues.md` (~lines 54-55): "There's no way to remove a task once added — only `add`, `list`, and `done`." Contradicted by Module 4 committing a `delete` command (`verify.sh`; README ~lines 353/401) and Module 6 implementing priorities. (Note: Module 6's priorities/count/clear live on an experiment branch whose merge to `main` is conditional — so the `delete` contradiction is the strongest, and the count/clear claim should not be overstated.) ## Why it matters Factual contradictions within the course's own materials, against carry-forward integrity. The delete/priorities examples are load-bearing (reused in the README's routing-heuristic prose). ## Proposed change Minimum fix (preserves the worked examples): 1. Drop Issue 2's false absolute claim ("only add, list, and done / no way to remove a task"). 2. Soften Issue 3's already-answered questions; frame the issues from the project's earlier state. 3. Add a one-line note that delete/priorities may already exist from earlier modules. (Shipping a pinned starter-state snapshot like M10/M13 is awkward here because M9's lab runs against the learner's pushed forge repo, not a local snapshot.) ## Acceptance criteria - [ ] Issue 2 no longer states the app lacks delete / has only add/list/done. - [ ] Issue 3 no longer presents already-implemented decisions as open questions. - [ ] A note acknowledges some features may already exist from earlier modules. ## Affected files - `modules/09-issues-and-the-task-layer/lab/example-issues.md` (and README note if needed) ## References Source finding F23 (realVotes 3/3). --- *Filed from an adversarial multi-agent course review (217 raw findings → 54 adversarially-verified survivors). Scoped for manual review; intentionally not auto-assigned to an agent.*

claude added the bug P2 ai-ready labels 2026-06-22 14:23:57 -04:00

claude referenced a pull request that will close this issue

2026-06-22 17:51:47 -04:00

Reframe Module 9 worked-examples off already-built features (#40) #70

claude referenced this issue from a commit

2026-06-22 17:51:48 -04:00

fix(module-9): reframe worked-example issues off already-built features (device-preserving)

claude closed this issue

2026-06-22 17:51:58 -04:00

claude referenced this issue from a commit

2026-06-22 17:51:59 -04:00

Reframe Module 9 worked-examples off already-built features (#40) (#70)