# AGENTS.md — instructions for AI agents working in this repo > This is the committed AI instructions file for *The Workflow* course. It exists for two reasons: > it actually configures the agents that help author the course, **and** it is a live worked example > of [Module 5 — Commit the AI's Config, Not Just the Code](modules/05-commit-the-ai-config/). The > filename is deliberately vendor-neutral: most agentic coding tools read a repo-level instructions > file, and the principle outlives any one vendor's filename. If your tool looks for a different > name, point it here. ## What this repo is A course that teaches IT professionals the engineering toolchain *around* AI coding — version control, collaboration, CI/CD, and the tools that extend AI into real systems. The repo is both the course content and a dogfooded example of the practices it teaches. - **Source of truth for structure:** `the-workflow-syllabus.md`. Don't re-derive decisions it settles; read it first. - **Build-context for authoring:** `handoff.md`. The "how" of building, plus the owner's settled decisions. - **Every module follows** `_TEMPLATE.md`. Don't invent a new shape per module. ## Core promises (do not violate) - **Model-agnostic in principle; Claude Code as the concrete example.** The concepts and workflow never depend on one LLM or tool. Name the common agentic tools once, then use **Claude Code** as the worked example in commands and labs — e.g. `claude --version # sub your own agent`. Keep the *concepts* vendor-neutral; use a concrete tool so steps aren't abstract. Examples must survive a model swap. - **GitHub is the default, not the requirement.** Keep hosting content provider-neutral; name the alternatives and the self-host track. Do not reintroduce a single specific forge as *the* answer. - **The dependency chain is load-bearing.** A module may assume only what precedes it. Never reference a tool before its introducing module. If you think something should move, **flag it** — don't silently reorder. - **Honesty about limits.** Where a tool or analogy breaks, say so. Don't sand off the caveats. - **Don't pad.** This audience reads fast and trusts concrete over comprehensive. Lead with the pain, show the command and the failure mode. ## What the course teaches about git (the reframe) This is **not** a "memorize git commands" course. The reader should finish knowing git is *critical*, understanding the *concepts* and the *basics*, and — above all — that they don't have to memorize commands because **the AI drives git for them**. The analogy: learn arithmetic by hand, then use a calculator. - **Modules 1–3 teach the mechanics by hand, on purpose.** The AI is still in the browser; the learner types git to build intuition. Keep that. - **Module 4 is the pivot.** It puts the AI in the editor/CLI. From there on the learner **directs the AI** to do the git work (commit, branch, merge, revert, decide what to commit) and **verifies** the result — they don't type the commands by hand, and modules must not tell them to. - **Don't re-teach basics.** Once a concept is introduced, later modules build on it through the AI; they don't re-explain how to create a branch, etc. ## Lesson vs. lab (keep them separate) - The **lesson / Key-concepts** section is **theory**. To show a command, show it *with example output* as illustration — never instruct the reader to *run* it there. - **All hands-on execution lives in the lab.** The lesson must not duplicate commands the lab runs. ## Voice Direct, concrete, rigorous. Reframe ops instincts the reader already has toward AI-assisted work. No motivational filler. When in doubt, show the command and what goes wrong without it. **No slop.** Don't write like an AI. Avoid "prose" (say "writing", "words", or "docs"), "unlock", "leverage" as filler, "delve", "dive in", "seamless", "in today's fast-paced", "it's worth noting". Don't lean on em-dashes — at density they read as a machine tell; vary the punctuation. ## Conventions for labs - Labs run on the learner's **own machine, any OS**. Don't assume a sandbox, cloud account, or specific shell beyond what's stated. - Lean on **Python or shell**, chosen per lab, kept minimal. State the language once per lab. - Every module ends at a keyboard (a lab), not a quiz, and has a concrete "you're done when…" check. ## Working in this repo (dogfooding the course) This repo is hosted on `git.jpaul.io`. Follow the same flow the course teaches: - **Never commit directly to `main`.** Branch per module/change, open a PR, squash-merge. The PR is the review gate (Module 10) even for solo work — it exists for traceability. - **Build in dependency-chain order.** Modules 1–2 are the locked exemplars; match their tone, depth, and lab style. - **Verify before publishing volatile claims.** Anything about pricing, versions, or tool behavior (especially the Module 8 hosting comparison) must be checked at build time, not written from memory. Mark such claims with a "Verify-before-publish" note. ## Don't - Duplicate or fork `the-workflow-syllabus.md` — edit it in place if structure changes. - Reorder modules or break the dependency chain without flagging it. - Pin to a specific LLM vendor or a specific tool's config filename. - Write pricing/version claims from memory. - Pad.