Windsurf + Aider targets, MCP server, and demo placement (#33)

Broadens both reach (more tools) and content types (an MCP server), continuing
the multi-platform story.

Windsurf + Aider:
- build-exports.mjs gains two platforms: exports/windsurf/*.md (workspace rules,
  trigger: model_decision) and exports/aider/*.md (conventions for `aider --read`).
  Now 5 platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Aider).
- install.sh + bin/cli.mjs install both (windsurf -> .windsurf/rules, aider ->
  .aider/skills with a --read hint); generated README index is excluded from copies.
- One-line windsurf-install.sh / aider-install.sh wrappers for parity.

MCP server (new content type):
- mcp/server.mjs — zero-dependency stdio MCP server exposing list_skills,
  search_skills, get_skill. Published as a second bin (pm-claude-skills-mcp).
  Logs to stderr; reads bundled skills/ at startup. mcp/README.md documents
  client config.

Also: README hero "See it in action" demo placement (ready to swap in a GIF;
recording guide in web/docs-assets/README.md), Works-With table + exports +
install docs updated, CHANGELOG Unreleased. package.json files/bin updated.


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
mohitagw15856
2026-06-17 23:15:38 +01:00
committed by GitHub
parent 123aabe5e3
commit 036511ab3e
358 changed files with 60408 additions and 38 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
# Contract Review Skill
This skill produces a structured contract review identifying key terms, unusual or high-risk clauses, and a plain English summary. Always include the disclaimer that this is not legal advice.
## Required Inputs
- **Contract text or description** (paste or describe)
- **Reviewer role** (e.g. the party signing, their legal team, a business owner)
- **Contract type** (e.g. SaaS agreement, employment contract, NDA, supplier contract)
- **Key concerns** (optional — e.g. "focus on IP ownership and termination clauses")
## Output Structure
### 1. Contract Overview
- **Type:** [Contract type]
- **Parties:** [Party A and Party B]
- **Effective date / duration:** [If stated]
- **Governing law:** [Jurisdiction]
- **Overall risk rating:** Green Low / Amber Medium / Red High
### 2. Key Terms Summary
| Term | Detail |
|---|---|
| Payment / fees | |
| Term and renewal | |
| Termination rights | |
| Liability cap | |
| IP ownership | |
| Confidentiality | |
| Dispute resolution | |
### 3. Flagged Clauses
For each flagged clause:
**[Risk level] — [Clause name]**
- **What it says:** [Plain English summary]
- **Why it matters:** [Risk or implication]
- **Suggested action:** [Negotiate / Accept / Seek legal advice / Query]
### 4. Missing Clauses
List any standard clauses absent but normally expected for this contract type.
### 5. Plain English Summary
3-5 sentences. What does this contract mean for the party signing it?
### 6. Recommended Next Steps
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
---
WARNING: This review is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a qualified solicitor or lawyer before signing any legally binding agreement.
## Quality Checks
- [ ] Overall risk rating is justified (not just "Medium" without reasons)
- [ ] All flagged clauses have a specific recommended action (not just "read this")
- [ ] Missing clauses section is completed for this contract type
- [ ] Plain English summary can be understood by a non-lawyer
- [ ] Disclaimer is included
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not provide legal advice or suggest the review substitutes for qualified legal counsel
- [ ] Do not skip flagging unusual or one-sided clauses because they appear standard
- [ ] Do not omit a plain-English summary — legal jargon alone is not useful output
- [ ] Do not rate risk without explaining what specifically drives that rating
- [ ] Do not ignore missing clauses — absence of key protections is itself a risk
## Example Trigger Phrases
- "Review this contract: [paste]"
- "Flag the key risks in this agreement"
- "Summarise this SaaS contract in plain English"
- "What should I watch out for in this supplier agreement?"