Windsurf + Aider targets, MCP server, and demo placement (#33)
Broadens both reach (more tools) and content types (an MCP server), continuing the multi-platform story. Windsurf + Aider: - build-exports.mjs gains two platforms: exports/windsurf/*.md (workspace rules, trigger: model_decision) and exports/aider/*.md (conventions for `aider --read`). Now 5 platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Aider). - install.sh + bin/cli.mjs install both (windsurf -> .windsurf/rules, aider -> .aider/skills with a --read hint); generated README index is excluded from copies. - One-line windsurf-install.sh / aider-install.sh wrappers for parity. MCP server (new content type): - mcp/server.mjs — zero-dependency stdio MCP server exposing list_skills, search_skills, get_skill. Published as a second bin (pm-claude-skills-mcp). Logs to stderr; reads bundled skills/ at startup. mcp/README.md documents client config. Also: README hero "See it in action" demo placement (ready to swap in a GIF; recording guide in web/docs-assets/README.md), Works-With table + exports + install docs updated, CHANGELOG Unreleased. package.json files/bin updated. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
+67
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
# Competitive Intelligence Monitor Skill
|
||||
|
||||
Turn scattered competitor updates into structured weekly intelligence — not just "what they did" but "what changed since last week and what it means for us."
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
Ask the user for these if not provided:
|
||||
- **Competitors to monitor** (list of company names)
|
||||
- **Your current roadmap or strategic priorities** (to assess relevance of signals)
|
||||
- **Previous brief or last run summary** (for diff mode — what's new vs. last time)
|
||||
- **Time period** (this week, this month)
|
||||
|
||||
## Signal Categories to Monitor
|
||||
- **Product signals:** New features, removals, UX changes, beta programmes
|
||||
- **Pricing signals:** Changes to tiers, free limits, enterprise terms
|
||||
- **Hiring signals:** Job postings revealing strategic bets
|
||||
- **Partnership signals:** Integrations, acquisitions, ecosystem moves
|
||||
- **Messaging signals:** Changes in positioning, audience, value proposition
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
### First Run (Full Report)
|
||||
1. For each competitor provided, scan all five signal categories
|
||||
2. Categorise each signal found
|
||||
3. Assess: reactive (responding to market) or proactive (setting direction)?
|
||||
4. Rate threat level: High / Medium / Low / Watch
|
||||
5. Connect each signal to a specific item on the provided roadmap
|
||||
6. Recommend response: Accelerate / Deprioritise / Monitor / Investigate
|
||||
7. **Validate** — Every High signal must have a specific recommended action and owner. "Monitor" is only acceptable for Low and Watch ratings.
|
||||
|
||||
### Subsequent Runs (Diff Only)
|
||||
1. Compare current signals against previous run summary
|
||||
2. Output ONLY what is new or changed since last run
|
||||
3. Flag if a previously Low signal has escalated to High
|
||||
4. Keep output under 300 words — brevity is the point
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Intelligence Brief — [Date]
|
||||
**New Since Last Run:** [n signals]
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🔴 High Priority
|
||||
**[Competitor]:** [Signal] → [Implication] → [Recommended action + owner]
|
||||
|
||||
#### 🟡 Watch
|
||||
**[Competitor]:** [Signal] → [Why it matters now]
|
||||
|
||||
#### ✅ No Change
|
||||
[Competitors with no new signals this week]
|
||||
|
||||
**This Week's Strategic Summary:**
|
||||
[2 sentences max — what is the overall competitive landscape doing?]
|
||||
|
||||
## Anti-Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Do not mark a signal as Low priority simply because it is new and unfamiliar — unknown competitive moves often deserve investigation before dismissal
|
||||
- [ ] Do not provide "monitor" as the recommended response for a High-priority signal — High signals require a specific action with a named owner
|
||||
- [ ] Do not include signals from competitors that are not relevant to the stated roadmap or strategic priorities — noise reduces the brief's usefulness and trains the team to ignore it
|
||||
- [ ] Do not produce a diff-mode brief that is longer than the full report — if the diff output exceeds 300 words, it is a full report, not a diff
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Every High-priority signal has a specific response action and owner
|
||||
- [ ] Signals are categorised (not just listed as "they did X")
|
||||
- [ ] Roadmap connections are specific (not "generally relevant")
|
||||
- [ ] Diff mode output is under 300 words
|
||||
- [ ] Strategic summary describes the landscape trend, not just repeats individual signals
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user