feat: add 27 new skills across 7 professions — 80 skills, 21 plugins (v5.0.0)
This commit is contained in:
mohitagw15856
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://anthropic.com/claude-code/plugin.schema.json",
|
||||
"name": "pm-legal",
|
||||
"version": "1.0.0",
|
||||
"description": "Legal skills: Contract Review, NDA Analyser, Legal Brief, Compliance Checklist. Flag risks in contracts and NDAs, draft legal memos in IRAC format, and generate GDPR, SOC 2, FCA and other compliance checklists. Not a substitute for qualified legal advice.",
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"name": "Mohit Aggarwal",
|
||||
"email": "mohit15856@gmail.com"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"homepage": "https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills",
|
||||
"license": "MIT",
|
||||
"keywords": ["legal", "contract-review", "nda", "compliance", "gdpr", "legal-brief", "risk"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: compliance-checklist
|
||||
description: "Generate a compliance checklist for any regulation, standard, or policy. Use when asked to create a compliance checklist, regulatory review, audit checklist, or policy adherence review. Covers GDPR, ISO 27001, FCA, HIPAA, SOC 2, and other frameworks. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessment and remediation actions."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Compliance Checklist Skill
|
||||
|
||||
Generates a structured compliance checklist for any regulatory framework with a prioritised gap analysis and remediation actions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
- **Framework or regulation** (e.g. GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001, FCA Consumer Duty, PCI DSS)
|
||||
- **Organisation type** (e.g. SaaS company, financial services, NHS trust, law firm)
|
||||
- **Scope** (e.g. data handling, customer onboarding, IT security, HR processes)
|
||||
- **Known gaps or concerns** (optional)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Framework Overview
|
||||
- **Regulation/Standard:** [Name and version]
|
||||
- **Enforcement body:** [Regulator]
|
||||
- **Overall compliance status:** Red Gaps / Amber Partial / Green Compliant
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Compliance Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Requirement | Status | Priority | Action Required |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1 | [Plain English requirement] | Met / Gap / Partial / Unknown | Critical / High / Low | [Specific action] |
|
||||
|
||||
Priority definitions:
|
||||
- Critical: Regulatory breach risk. Remediate immediately.
|
||||
- High: Significant gap. Address within 30 days.
|
||||
- Low: Best practice. Address in next review cycle.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Critical Gaps Summary
|
||||
List only Critical items with: what is missing, regulatory requirement breached, recommended remediation and owner.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Recommended Remediation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
| Action | Owner | Timeline | Effort |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| [Specific action] | [Team/role] | [Timeframe] | Low/Med/High |
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Documentation Gaps
|
||||
Policies, records, or evidence needed to demonstrate compliance.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: This checklist is a starting point based on publicly available guidance. It does not constitute legal or compliance advice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Create a GDPR compliance checklist for our SaaS product"
|
||||
- "Generate a SOC 2 audit checklist"
|
||||
- "Review our compliance against FCA Consumer Duty"
|
||||
- "Build an ISO 27001 gap analysis"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: contract-review
|
||||
description: "Review and summarise any contract or legal agreement. Use when asked to review a contract, check an agreement, flag legal risks, or summarise key clauses. Produces a structured review with key terms, flagged clauses, risk rating, and plain English summary. Not a substitute for qualified legal advice."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Contract Review Skill
|
||||
|
||||
This skill produces a structured contract review identifying key terms, unusual or high-risk clauses, and a plain English summary. Always include the disclaimer that this is not legal advice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
- **Contract text or description** (paste or describe)
|
||||
- **Reviewer role** (e.g. the party signing, their legal team, a business owner)
|
||||
- **Contract type** (e.g. SaaS agreement, employment contract, NDA, supplier contract)
|
||||
- **Key concerns** (optional — e.g. "focus on IP ownership and termination clauses")
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Contract Overview
|
||||
- **Type:** [Contract type]
|
||||
- **Parties:** [Party A and Party B]
|
||||
- **Effective date / duration:** [If stated]
|
||||
- **Governing law:** [Jurisdiction]
|
||||
- **Overall risk rating:** Green Low / Amber Medium / Red High
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Key Terms Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| Term | Detail |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Payment / fees | |
|
||||
| Term and renewal | |
|
||||
| Termination rights | |
|
||||
| Liability cap | |
|
||||
| IP ownership | |
|
||||
| Confidentiality | |
|
||||
| Dispute resolution | |
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Flagged Clauses
|
||||
|
||||
For each flagged clause:
|
||||
|
||||
**[Risk level] — [Clause name]**
|
||||
- **What it says:** [Plain English summary]
|
||||
- **Why it matters:** [Risk or implication]
|
||||
- **Suggested action:** [Negotiate / Accept / Seek legal advice / Query]
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Missing Clauses
|
||||
List any standard clauses absent but normally expected for this contract type.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Plain English Summary
|
||||
3-5 sentences. What does this contract mean for the party signing it?
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Recommended Next Steps
|
||||
- [Action 1]
|
||||
- [Action 2]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: This review is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a qualified solicitor or lawyer before signing any legally binding agreement.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Review this contract: [paste]"
|
||||
- "Flag the key risks in this agreement"
|
||||
- "Summarise this SaaS contract in plain English"
|
||||
- "What should I watch out for in this supplier agreement?"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: legal-brief
|
||||
description: "Draft a structured legal brief, case summary, or legal argument outline. Use when asked to write a legal brief, case note, legal memo, argument outline, or position paper. Produces a structured document using IRAC format (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion)."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Legal Brief Skill
|
||||
|
||||
This skill drafts structured legal briefs and memos using IRAC format — the standard structure for legal writing.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
- **Brief type** (legal memo / case summary / argument outline / position paper / letter before action)
|
||||
- **Legal issue or question**
|
||||
- **Jurisdiction** (England & Wales / US / EU / Other)
|
||||
- **Relevant facts**
|
||||
- **Relevant law or cases** (if known — otherwise flagged as [RESEARCH NEEDED])
|
||||
- **Audience** (internal memo / court submission / client letter)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Header
|
||||
- **To:** [Recipient]
|
||||
- **From:** [Author]
|
||||
- **Date:** [Date]
|
||||
- **Re:** [Matter reference]
|
||||
- **Confidential:** Subject to legal professional privilege
|
||||
|
||||
### Issue(s)
|
||||
One sentence per legal question:
|
||||
- Issue 1: Whether X constitutes Y under [law]
|
||||
|
||||
### Brief Answer
|
||||
One sentence per issue — conclusion upfront before analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
### Facts
|
||||
Concise relevant facts only. Flag disputed facts.
|
||||
|
||||
### Law (Rule)
|
||||
- Relevant statute, regulation, or case law
|
||||
- How the rule has been interpreted in key cases
|
||||
- Flag [RESEARCH NEEDED] where law is not provided
|
||||
|
||||
### Application
|
||||
- Arguments in favour
|
||||
- Counter-arguments and responses
|
||||
- Areas of uncertainty flagged explicitly
|
||||
|
||||
### Conclusion
|
||||
- Clear answer to each issue
|
||||
- Overall recommendation
|
||||
- Suggested next steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Caveats
|
||||
What this memo does not cover. What additional research would change the analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: This draft requires review by a qualified legal professional. It does not constitute legal advice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Draft a legal memo on [issue]"
|
||||
- "Write a legal brief arguing [position]"
|
||||
- "Summarise the legal position on [topic]"
|
||||
- "Write a letter before action for [situation]"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: nda-analyser
|
||||
description: "Analyse a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) and flag key terms, unusual provisions, and negotiation points. Use when asked to review an NDA, mutual NDA, confidentiality agreement, or non-disclosure deed. Produces clause-by-clause analysis with risk flags and a negotiation checklist."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# NDA Analyser Skill
|
||||
|
||||
NDAs are often treated as routine paperwork but contain terms with significant long-term consequences. This skill analyses them systematically.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
- **NDA text** (paste in full or describe key clauses)
|
||||
- **Your party position** (disclosing / receiving / mutual)
|
||||
- **Purpose of the NDA** (e.g. pre-sales, hiring, M&A, partnership)
|
||||
- **Industry context** (optional)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. NDA Type and Parties
|
||||
- **Type:** Unilateral / Mutual
|
||||
- **Disclosing party:** [Name]
|
||||
- **Receiving party:** [Name]
|
||||
- **Purpose:** [As stated]
|
||||
- **Governing law:** [Jurisdiction]
|
||||
- **Term:** [Duration of obligations]
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Definition of Confidential Information
|
||||
- **How broadly defined?** Narrow / Standard / Very broad
|
||||
- **Oral disclosures included?** Yes / No / With conditions
|
||||
- **Standard exclusions present?** [public domain, prior knowledge, independently developed, legally required disclosure]
|
||||
- **Flag:** [Unusual inclusions or missing exclusions]
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Key Clause Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**[Clause name] — Concern / Watch / Standard**
|
||||
- **What it says:** [Plain English]
|
||||
- **Issue:** [Why flagged]
|
||||
- **Standard position:** [What this typically looks like]
|
||||
- **Negotiation suggestion:** [If applicable]
|
||||
|
||||
Clauses always covered: permitted use, non-solicitation/non-compete, term and post-termination obligations, return/destruction of information, remedies, liability, residuals clause.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Negotiation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
| Point | Current position | Suggested ask |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| [e.g. Confidentiality term] | [e.g. 5 years] | [e.g. Reduce to 2 years] |
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Plain English Verdict
|
||||
2-3 sentences. Standard NDA, one-sided, or needs a lawyer?
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: This analysis is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor before signing.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Analyse this NDA"
|
||||
- "Review this confidentiality agreement"
|
||||
- "Is this NDA standard or unusual?"
|
||||
- "What should I negotiate in this mutual NDA?"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user