feat: add 27 new skills across 7 professions — 80 skills, 21 plugins (v5.0.0)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: vendor-evaluation
|
||||
description: "Create a structured vendor evaluation framework for any procurement decision. Use when asked to evaluate vendors, compare suppliers, run an RFP scoring process, or assess a software or service provider. Produces a weighted scorecard, evaluation criteria, and recommendation framework."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Vendor Evaluation Skill
|
||||
|
||||
Produces a structured vendor evaluation framework — from defining criteria through to a scored comparison and recommendation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
- **What you are procuring**
|
||||
- **Vendors being evaluated** (minimum 2)
|
||||
- **Key decision criteria** (if known)
|
||||
- **Decision makers**
|
||||
- **Budget range**
|
||||
- **Timeline to decide**
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Evaluation Criteria and Weights
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Weight | Rationale |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Functional fit | [%] | Does it do what we need? |
|
||||
| Commercial terms | [%] | Price, flexibility, payment |
|
||||
| Implementation | [%] | How hard to get started? |
|
||||
| Support and SLA | [%] | What happens when things go wrong? |
|
||||
| Security and compliance | [%] | Meets regulatory requirements? |
|
||||
| Vendor stability | [%] | Will this company exist in 3 years? |
|
||||
| References | [%] | Who else uses this? |
|
||||
|
||||
Weights must total 100%.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Scoring Rubric
|
||||
- 5: Exceeds requirements — clear best-in-class
|
||||
- 4: Meets requirements — fully satisfies with minor gaps
|
||||
- 3: Partially meets — notable gaps requiring workarounds
|
||||
- 2: Significant gaps — would require workarounds
|
||||
- 1: Does not meet — cannot satisfy requirement
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Vendor Scorecard
|
||||
|
||||
| Criterion | Weight | [Vendor A] | Weighted | [Vendor B] | Weighted | [Vendor C] | Weighted |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Functional fit | [%] | /5 | | /5 | | /5 | |
|
||||
| [Continue...] | | | | | | | |
|
||||
| **Total** | 100% | | **/5** | | **/5** | | **/5** |
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Key Questions for Every Vendor
|
||||
Functional: Walk through [most critical use case]. What can your product not do that customers ask for?
|
||||
Commercial: What is included vs add-ons? Contract minimum term and notice period? Price protection at renewal?
|
||||
Implementation: Typical implementation for our size? What do you need from our team?
|
||||
Support: SLA for critical issues? Support included vs charged extra?
|
||||
Security: ISO 27001 / SOC 2 certified? Where is data stored? Breach notification process?
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Reference Check Questions
|
||||
- How long using [vendor]? Implementation surprises? Support responsiveness? One thing you wish you had known? Would you choose them again?
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended vendor:** [Name] | **Score:** [X/5]
|
||||
**Rationale:** [Specific strengths that matter for this decision]
|
||||
**Key risks:** [Risk and mitigation]
|
||||
**Conditions:** [Contract terms to negotiate before signing]
|
||||
**Runner-up:** [Vendor and why they lost]
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Help me evaluate vendors for [procurement]"
|
||||
- "Create a vendor scorecard for [software/service]"
|
||||
- "Compare [Vendor A] vs [Vendor B] for [use case]"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user