feat: add 27 new skills across 7 professions — 80 skills, 21 plugins (v5.0.0)
This commit is contained in:
mohitagw15856
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"$schema": "https://anthropic.com/claude-code/plugin.schema.json",
|
||||
"name": "pm-research",
|
||||
"version": "1.0.0",
|
||||
"description": "Research and healthcare skills: Clinical Case Summary, Research Protocol, Patient Communication, Literature Review. Write SBAR handovers, design research protocols, draft accessible patient communications, and structure literature reviews.",
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"name": "Mohit Aggarwal",
|
||||
"email": "mohit15856@gmail.com"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"homepage": "https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills",
|
||||
"license": "MIT",
|
||||
"keywords": ["research", "healthcare", "clinical", "patient", "literature-review", "protocol", "academic"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: clinical-case-summary
|
||||
description: "Write a structured clinical case summary or case presentation. Use when asked to write a clinical case summary, case presentation, patient case report, or clinical handover. Produces a structured summary using SBAR or SOAP format. For educational and documentation purposes only — not a substitute for clinical judgement."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Clinical Case Summary Skill
|
||||
|
||||
Produces structured clinical case summaries for educational, documentation, and handover purposes.
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: For documentation and educational purposes only. All clinical content must be reviewed by a qualified healthcare professional. This is not clinical advice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
- **Purpose** (case presentation / handover / case report / educational / MDT summary)
|
||||
- **Patient details** (anonymised — age, sex, relevant background)
|
||||
- **Presenting complaint and history**
|
||||
- **Examination findings**
|
||||
- **Investigations and results**
|
||||
- **Diagnosis or differential diagnoses**
|
||||
- **Management and treatment**
|
||||
- **Outcome** (if known)
|
||||
- **Format preference** (SBAR / SOAP / Standard clinical / Narrative)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Format A: SBAR (Handover / Referral)
|
||||
|
||||
**S — Situation**
|
||||
[Patient identifier anonymised, location, reason for contact in one sentence]
|
||||
|
||||
**B — Background**
|
||||
- Age / sex / relevant past medical history
|
||||
- Current admission details
|
||||
- Relevant medications and allergies
|
||||
- Brief relevant social history
|
||||
|
||||
**A — Assessment**
|
||||
- Current clinical status
|
||||
- Vital signs if relevant
|
||||
- Key examination findings
|
||||
- Working diagnosis or differential
|
||||
- Recent investigations and results
|
||||
|
||||
**R — Recommendation**
|
||||
- What you need from the recipient
|
||||
- Urgency level
|
||||
- Immediate actions already taken
|
||||
- Questions or concerns
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Format B: SOAP Note
|
||||
|
||||
**S — Subjective**
|
||||
[Presenting complaint in patient words. Symptom history: onset, duration, character, severity, associated symptoms, relieving/aggravating factors]
|
||||
|
||||
**O — Objective**
|
||||
- Vital signs: [BP, HR, RR, Temp, O2 sats]
|
||||
- Examination: [Systematic findings]
|
||||
- Investigations: [Results with reference ranges]
|
||||
|
||||
**A — Assessment**
|
||||
- Primary diagnosis: [With brief rationale]
|
||||
- Differential diagnoses: [Ranked with reasoning]
|
||||
|
||||
**P — Plan**
|
||||
- Immediate management
|
||||
- Investigations ordered
|
||||
- Treatments initiated with dose, route, frequency
|
||||
- Referrals
|
||||
- Safety netting: what to watch for, when to escalate
|
||||
- Follow-up plan
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
- Patient details fully anonymised
|
||||
- Allergies and medications included in handover formats
|
||||
- Safety netting included in SOAP plan
|
||||
- Disclaimer included
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Write a clinical handover using SBAR for this patient"
|
||||
- "Summarise this case in SOAP format"
|
||||
- "Write a case report for [clinical scenario]"
|
||||
- "Prepare an MDT summary for this patient"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: literature-review
|
||||
description: "Structure and write a literature review for any research topic. Use when asked to write a literature review, systematic review summary, narrative review, or research background section. Produces a structured review with thematic organisation, critical analysis, and gap identification."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Literature Review Skill
|
||||
|
||||
Structures and writes literature reviews — from background sections of a dissertation through to standalone narrative reviews for publication.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
- **Topic or research question**
|
||||
- **Type of review** (narrative / systematic / scoping / integrative / background section)
|
||||
- **Sources provided** (paste references, abstracts, or key findings)
|
||||
- **Word count target**
|
||||
- **Audience** (academic journal / thesis / grant proposal / policy brief)
|
||||
- **Time period to cover**
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Search Strategy Summary (for systematic/scoping reviews)
|
||||
**Databases:** [PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, etc.]
|
||||
**Search terms:** [Key terms and Boolean combinations]
|
||||
**Inclusion criteria:** Study types, population, date range, language
|
||||
**Exclusion criteria:** [List]
|
||||
**Results:** [n] identified → [n] after deduplication → [n] screened → [n] included
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Literature Review Body
|
||||
|
||||
Organised thematically — not chronologically. Each theme = one section.
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure per thematic section:**
|
||||
|
||||
**[Theme heading]**
|
||||
|
||||
[Opening: state what this section covers and what evidence shows overall]
|
||||
|
||||
[Evidence synthesis: present what multiple studies found, compare and contrast. Do NOT summarise one paper then the next — synthesise across them: "Three studies found X (Smith, 2019; Jones, 2020; Lee, 2021), while two found Y, with the difference attributable to..."]
|
||||
|
||||
[Critical analysis: note methodological strengths and weaknesses — sample sizes, study designs, generalisability, risk of bias]
|
||||
|
||||
[Closing: transition to next theme]
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Synthesis Table (systematic/scoping reviews)
|
||||
|
||||
| Author, year | Study design | Population | n | Key findings | Quality/Limitations |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Gap Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Well-established:** [What literature consistently shows]
|
||||
**Contested:** [Areas where evidence is mixed and why]
|
||||
**Missing:** [Gaps the field needs to address]
|
||||
**How your study addresses the gap:** [If this is for a research proposal]
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Conclusion Paragraph
|
||||
[3-5 sentences. Current state of knowledge and what is needed next]
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Analysis Framework
|
||||
For each paper: internal validity, external validity, bias types, effect size significance vs clinical significance, funding conflicts.
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
- Organised thematically not as paper summaries
|
||||
- Evidence synthesised across papers
|
||||
- Critical analysis included
|
||||
- Gaps identified
|
||||
- All claims cited
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Write a literature review on [topic]"
|
||||
- "Synthesise the evidence on [topic] from these papers: [paste]"
|
||||
- "Write the background section for my research proposal on [topic]"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: patient-communication
|
||||
description: "Write clear, plain English patient communications for any healthcare context. Use when asked to write a patient letter, patient information leaflet, appointment letter, test results letter, discharge summary for patients, or health education content. Targets accessible reading level with clear next steps."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Patient Communication Skill
|
||||
|
||||
Writes patient-facing healthcare communications in plain, accessible language — targeting UK Grade 6 / US Grade 8 reading level.
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: All patient communications must be reviewed and approved by a qualified healthcare professional before sending. This skill produces drafts only.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
- **Communication type** (appointment letter / results letter / discharge info / patient leaflet / consent info / health education)
|
||||
- **Clinical context**
|
||||
- **Key messages** (what the patient must understand and do)
|
||||
- **Tone** (reassuring / informative / urgent)
|
||||
- **Specific instructions or next steps**
|
||||
- **Contact details for queries**
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Type A: Patient Letter
|
||||
|
||||
[Date]
|
||||
|
||||
Dear [Patient name],
|
||||
|
||||
**Re: [Clear subject line in bold]**
|
||||
|
||||
[Opening paragraph: State clearly what this letter is about. No preamble.]
|
||||
|
||||
[Main content — short paragraphs, 2-3 sentences each. Bullet points for instructions. Bold anything the patient must do or remember.]
|
||||
|
||||
**What happens next:**
|
||||
- [Action 1 — specific with timeframe]
|
||||
- [Action 2]
|
||||
|
||||
**If you have questions:**
|
||||
Contact us at [phone] between [hours] or email [address].
|
||||
|
||||
If you feel unwell before your appointment, please [specific instruction].
|
||||
|
||||
Yours sincerely, [Name, Title, Department]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Type B: Patient Information Leaflet
|
||||
|
||||
**[Plain language title]**
|
||||
|
||||
**What is [topic]?** [2-3 plain English sentences. Explain technical terms immediately.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Why has this been recommended for me?** [Personalised clinical reason in patient terms]
|
||||
|
||||
**What will happen?** [Numbered step by step]
|
||||
|
||||
**What are the benefits?** [Honest statement]
|
||||
|
||||
**What are the risks?** [Common first, then rare but serious. Use frequencies: "About 1 in 10 people..." not "10% incidence"]
|
||||
|
||||
**What should I do to prepare?** [Specific instructions]
|
||||
|
||||
**When should I contact someone?** [Specific signs — not vague. "Temperature above 38C" not "if you feel unwell"]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Type C: Test Results Letter
|
||||
|
||||
**Your [test name] results — [Normal / Abnormal] — stated in the FIRST sentence, never paragraph 3.**
|
||||
|
||||
[What this means in plain English]
|
||||
|
||||
**What happens next:** [Clear next steps. If no action, say so explicitly.]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Plain Language Rules (apply to all types)
|
||||
- Maximum 2 syllables per word where possible
|
||||
- Maximum 20 words per sentence
|
||||
- Active voice: "We will contact you" not "You will be contacted"
|
||||
- Spell out all acronyms on first use
|
||||
- No Latin: "twice daily" not "bd"
|
||||
- Use "you" and "we" throughout
|
||||
- Numbers as digits: "2 tablets" not "two tablets"
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Write a patient letter about [topic]"
|
||||
- "Create a patient information leaflet for [procedure]"
|
||||
- "Write a plain English results letter for [test]"
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: research-protocol
|
||||
description: "Write a structured research protocol or study design document. Use when asked to write a research protocol, study protocol, research plan, methodology section, or research proposal. Produces a complete protocol with objectives, methodology, ethical considerations, and analysis plan."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Research Protocol Skill
|
||||
|
||||
Produces structured research protocols for academic, clinical, social science, or market research studies.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
- **Research type** (clinical trial / observational / qualitative / systematic review / survey)
|
||||
- **Research question or hypothesis**
|
||||
- **Setting and population**
|
||||
- **Proposed methodology**
|
||||
- **Timeline**
|
||||
- **Funder or institution** (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Research Protocol: [Study Title]
|
||||
**Version:** 1.0 | **Date:** [Date] | **PI:** [Name, institution]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Background and Rationale
|
||||
- What is already known
|
||||
- What the gap in knowledge is
|
||||
- Why this study is needed now
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Research Objectives
|
||||
**Primary:** [One clear answerable question or hypothesis]
|
||||
**Secondary:** [Additional questions]
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Study Design
|
||||
- **Design:** [RCT / cohort / qualitative / mixed methods]
|
||||
- **Setting:** [Where]
|
||||
- **Duration:** [Total period and recruitment window]
|
||||
- **Rationale:** [Why this design fits the question]
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Participants
|
||||
|
||||
**Inclusion criteria:** [List]
|
||||
**Exclusion criteria:** [List]
|
||||
**Sample size:** [n] — Basis: [Power calculation or saturation rationale]
|
||||
**Recruitment:** [Method and source]
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Methodology / Intervention
|
||||
|
||||
For interventional: intervention description, control, randomisation, blinding
|
||||
For observational/qualitative: data collection methods, tools, data collectors
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Outcomes / Measures
|
||||
**Primary outcome:** [Measure], assessed by [method], at [timepoint]
|
||||
**Secondary outcomes:** [Measure], [method], [timepoint]
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Data Management
|
||||
- Storage: [Where and anonymisation method]
|
||||
- Access controls: [Who can access]
|
||||
- Retention: [How long]
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Analysis Plan
|
||||
Quantitative: [Statistical test], [missing data handling], [software]
|
||||
Qualitative: [Framework — e.g. Braun & Clarke], [quality assurance]
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Ethical Considerations
|
||||
- Ethics approval: [Body / reference]
|
||||
- Informed consent: [Process]
|
||||
- Confidentiality: [How maintained]
|
||||
- Risk to participants: [Assessment and mitigation]
|
||||
|
||||
### 10. Dissemination Plan
|
||||
- Target journals: [2-3 relevant]
|
||||
- Conference presentations
|
||||
- Public/patient summary
|
||||
|
||||
### 11. Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
| Phase | Activities | Start | End |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Setup | Ethics, approvals, tool development | | |
|
||||
| Recruitment | | | |
|
||||
| Data collection | | | |
|
||||
| Analysis | | | |
|
||||
| Write-up | | | |
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
- Primary objective is singular and answerable
|
||||
- Sample size has stated basis
|
||||
- Ethical considerations complete
|
||||
- Analysis plan pre-specified
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Write a research protocol for [study]"
|
||||
- "Help me design a study to investigate [question]"
|
||||
- "Write the methodology for my research proposal"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user