Content quality improvements to 7 engineering skills (partial batch)

Applies reviewer-feedback-driven improvements across 7 skills:
- code-review-checklist: add Section 1 header, optional diff input, precise
  review time estimate, stronger quality checks
- debugging-log-analyser: improve Context input, add Frequency input,
  add Section 1 Error Classification header, stronger quality checks
- changelog-generator: add Previous Version Behaviour + Scope inputs,
  clarify Formatting Rules are skill-internal, stronger quality checks
- pr-description-writer: add Target Branch + Linked Issue inputs, fix
  Screenshots omission instruction, stronger quality checks
- test-strategy-doc: split Existing Coverage from Tech Stack, add
  Deployment Cadence input, fix Performance Tests conditional,
  stronger quality checks
- runbook-writer: add Monitoring Tools + Key Environment Details inputs,
  fix Last Updated placeholder, stronger quality checks
- incident-postmortem: add Responders + Customer Communications inputs

Both skills/ and plugins/pm-engineering/skills/ copies updated.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01C3HwChrccJd145vJ6Z7ajF
This commit is contained in:
mohitagw15856
2026-05-20 08:00:55 +00:00
committed by Claude
parent 929fa3ad7f
commit 49137bd1b6
14 changed files with 68 additions and 22 deletions
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ Parses raw error logs, stack traces, and crash reports into a structured diagnos
Ask for these if not provided:
- **The log / stack trace / error output** (paste directly or describe the error)
- **Language and framework** (e.g. Node.js + Express, Python + Django, Java Spring, Go)
- **Context** (what the user was doing when the error occurred)
- **Context** (what changed before this started — e.g. recent deploy, config change, increased traffic, new input data; or "nothing changed" is also useful)
- **Frequency** (one-off / intermittent / consistent / regression after a specific change)
- **Environment** (local dev / staging / production)
- **What they've already tried** (if anything)
@@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ Ask for these if not provided:
# Debugging Report: [Service/App Name]
### 1. Error Classification
**Error type:** [Runtime exception / Build error / Config error / Network error / Memory error / Unknown]
**Severity:** [Fatal / Critical / Warning / Informational]
**Recurrence pattern:** [One-off / Intermittent / Consistent / On-startup / Under load]
@@ -73,7 +75,8 @@ One or two concrete things that would prevent this class of error recurring:
- [ ] Root cause is specific (not "there might be a null pointer issue")
- [ ] At least one concrete code-level fix is suggested
- [ ] Next steps are actionable commands, not vague advice
- [ ] Language-specific idioms are used correctly
- [ ] Suggested fix references the actual language/framework in the input (not a generic fix that could apply to any language)
- [ ] Confidence level includes a stated reason (not just "High" or "Low" with no explanation)
- [ ] Prevention is proactive (not just "add error handling")
## Usage Examples