justin/pm-claude-skills
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(skills): add Anti-Patterns sections, fix descriptions, quality checks, and required inputs

Browse Source 
- Add Anti-Patterns section (3-5 binary checkboxes) to all modified skills
- Fix Quality Checks to use binary checkbox format where needed
- Rewrite descriptions to verb-when-produces format where needed
- Add Required Inputs sections to skills missing them
- Fix email-triage frontmatter YAML quoting

https://claude.ai/code/session_01MuGKn3a3Gbqoe8uM5Lmuqt
This commit is contained in:
Mohit
2026-06-08 10:20:50 +00:00
parent 44f69a541f
commit 4ff88bdbb1
88 changed files with 740 additions and 33 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
skills/nda-analyser/SKILL.md
+9 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: nda-analyser
description: "Analyse a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) and flag key terms, unusual provisions, and negotiation points. Use when asked to review an NDA, mutual NDA, confidentiality agreement, or non-disclosure deed. Produces clause-by-clause analysis with risk flags and a negotiation checklist."
description: "Analyses a Non-Disclosure Agreement clause by clause and flags unusual terms, one-sided provisions, and negotiation points. Use when reviewing an NDA, mutual NDA, confidentiality agreement, or non-disclosure deed before signing or countering. Produces a plain English verdict, clause-by-clause risk analysis, and a prioritised negotiation checklist — always with a disclaimer that qualified legal advice is required before signing."
---
# NDA Analyser Skill
@@ -61,6 +61,14 @@ WARNING: This analysis is for informational purposes only and is not legal advic
- [ ] Plain English verdict given (standard / one-sided / needs lawyer)
- [ ] Disclaimer is included
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not present the analysis as legal advice — the disclaimer must appear prominently and the output must recommend qualified legal review before any signing decision
- [ ] Do not skip the residuals clause check — residuals clauses allow the receiving party to use disclosed information from memory, which is one of the highest-risk provisions in any NDA
- [ ] Do not evaluate only the clauses explicitly flagged by the user — a complete analysis must cover all standard clause types even if the user only asked about one
- [ ] Do not assess breadth of the confidentiality definition without checking for oral disclosure coverage — oral disclosures with no written confirmation requirement are a common enforcement gap
- [ ] Do not omit the plain English verdict — a clause-by-clause analysis without a summary conclusion leaves the user unable to act on the findings
## Example Trigger Phrases
- "Analyse this NDA"
- "Review this confidentiality agreement"