justin/pm-claude-skills
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(skills): add Anti-Patterns sections, fix descriptions, quality checks, and required inputs

Browse Source 
- Add Anti-Patterns section (3-5 binary checkboxes) to all modified skills
- Fix Quality Checks to use binary checkbox format where needed
- Rewrite descriptions to verb-when-produces format where needed
- Add Required Inputs sections to skills missing them
- Fix email-triage frontmatter YAML quoting

https://claude.ai/code/session_01MuGKn3a3Gbqoe8uM5Lmuqt
This commit is contained in:
Mohit
2026-06-08 10:20:50 +00:00
parent 44f69a541f
commit 4ff88bdbb1
88 changed files with 740 additions and 33 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
skills/rice-impact-matrix/SKILL.md
+9 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: rice-impact-matrix
description: "Score features using RICE and plot against strategic alignment for nuanced prioritisation. Use when asked to prioritise features, build a priority matrix, combine quantitative scoring with strategic fit, or decide what to build next with multiple competing initiatives. Produces a scored priority matrix with RICE scores, strategic alignment ratings, quadrant placement, and sequencing recommendations."
description: "Scores features using both RICE and strategic alignment for nuanced prioritisation. Use when asked to prioritise features, build a priority matrix, combine quantitative scoring with strategic fit, or decide what to build next with multiple competing initiatives. Produces a scored priority matrix with RICE scores, strategic alignment ratings, quadrant placement, and sequencing recommendations."
---
# RICE + Strategic Alignment Skill
@@ -60,3 +60,11 @@ Combined Score = RICE Score + (Strategic Alignment × 10)
- [ ] Conflicts between RICE rank and strategic alignment are explicitly flagged
- [ ] "Drop" recommendations are specific — not just "low priority, deprioritise"
- [ ] Confidence levels on estimates are noted where weak (drives the 50% confidence flag)
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not treat the combined score as a definitive ranking — use it to structure a conversation, not replace one
- [ ] Do not rate strategic alignment as "high" because an initiative feels important without mapping it to a specific OKR
- [ ] Do not place all initiatives in the "Now" quadrant — a matrix with no "Drop" recommendations is not credible
- [ ] Do not ignore the conflict flag when RICE rank and strategic alignment sharply diverge
- [ ] Do not accept 100% confidence on estimates that have not been validated with data