fix: sync all skill updates and new skills into plugin bundles
- Synced 97 existing skill SKILL.md files from skills/ to their plugin bundle copies - Added 7 new skills to plugin bundles: - seo-content-brief, media-pitch -> pm-gtm - tax-planning-checklist -> pm-finance - change-management-plan -> pm-hr - sales-forecasting-model -> pm-sales - workshop-facilitation-guide -> pm-operations - teaching-lesson-plan -> pm-cross Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ List any standard clauses absent but normally expected for this contract type.
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: This review is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a qualified solicitor or lawyer before signing any legally binding agreement.
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Overall risk rating is justified (not just "Medium" without reasons)
|
||||
- [ ] All flagged clauses have a specific recommended action (not just "read this")
|
||||
- [ ] Missing clauses section is completed for this contract type
|
||||
- [ ] Plain English summary can be understood by a non-lawyer
|
||||
- [ ] Disclaimer is included
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Review this contract: [paste]"
|
||||
- "Flag the key risks in this agreement"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,6 +56,15 @@ What this memo does not cover. What additional research would change the analysi
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: This draft requires review by a qualified legal professional. It does not constitute legal advice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Issue is stated as a specific legal question (not a general topic)
|
||||
- [ ] Brief answer appears before the analysis (conclusion upfront)
|
||||
- [ ] Disputed facts are explicitly flagged
|
||||
- [ ] Areas of legal uncertainty are noted (not hidden in confident language)
|
||||
- [ ] Caveats section lists what would change the analysis
|
||||
- [ ] Disclaimer is included
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Draft a legal memo on [issue]"
|
||||
- "Write a legal brief arguing [position]"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -52,6 +52,15 @@ Clauses always covered: permitted use, non-solicitation/non-compete, term and po
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING: This analysis is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor before signing.
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Definition of confidential information assessed for scope (narrow / standard / very broad)
|
||||
- [ ] Residuals clause checked (allows memory use of disclosed information — high-risk)
|
||||
- [ ] Non-solicitation / non-compete provisions flagged
|
||||
- [ ] Post-termination obligations duration noted
|
||||
- [ ] Plain English verdict given (standard / one-sided / needs lawyer)
|
||||
- [ ] Disclaimer is included
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Analyse this NDA"
|
||||
- "Review this confidentiality agreement"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user