fix: sync all skill updates and new skills into plugin bundles
- Synced 97 existing skill SKILL.md files from skills/ to their plugin bundle copies - Added 7 new skills to plugin bundles: - seo-content-brief, media-pitch -> pm-gtm - tax-planning-checklist -> pm-finance - change-management-plan -> pm-hr - sales-forecasting-model -> pm-sales - workshop-facilitation-guide -> pm-operations - teaching-lesson-plan -> pm-cross Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -75,6 +75,14 @@ Produces clear, structured process documentation that someone new to a role can
|
||||
### Review
|
||||
Next review due: [Date]
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Every step has a named role (not "someone" or "the team")
|
||||
- [ ] Edge cases and exceptions table is complete
|
||||
- [ ] Prerequisites are listed so someone new can prepare before starting
|
||||
- [ ] Escalation path is named (specific people or roles, not just "your manager")
|
||||
- [ ] Review date is set
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Document this process: [description]"
|
||||
- "Write a process guide for [workflow]"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -103,6 +103,14 @@ RAG definitions:
|
||||
- Decisions must be genuinely actionable
|
||||
- Keep to one page where possible
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Red status is stated immediately (not buried after positives)
|
||||
- [ ] Every issue has a named owner and a resolution date
|
||||
- [ ] Decisions required are genuinely actionable by the audience
|
||||
- [ ] Milestones are binary (complete or not complete — no "85% done")
|
||||
- [ ] Executive summary can stand alone for a stakeholder who reads nothing else
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Write a project status report for [project]"
|
||||
- "Generate a RAG status update for [project]"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -81,11 +81,12 @@ NOTE: Steps must be written in imperative form. Each step must have one action o
|
||||
| 1.0 | [Date] | [Name] | Initial release |
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
- All steps in imperative form
|
||||
- Each step has exactly one action
|
||||
- Roles specified for every step
|
||||
- Quality checkpoints at critical stages
|
||||
- Non-conformance process defined
|
||||
- [ ] All steps written in imperative form ("Open...", "Navigate...", "Confirm...")
|
||||
- [ ] Each step has exactly one action
|
||||
- [ ] Role specified for every step
|
||||
- [ ] Quality checkpoints at critical stages
|
||||
- [ ] Non-conformance process defines who to notify and how to document
|
||||
- [ ] Document history table and review date are included
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Write an SOP for [process]"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -64,6 +64,15 @@ Security: ISO 27001 / SOC 2 certified? Where is data stored? Breach notification
|
||||
**Conditions:** [Contract terms to negotiate before signing]
|
||||
**Runner-up:** [Vendor and why they lost]
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Evaluation criteria weights total 100%
|
||||
- [ ] Scoring rubric is defined before scoring vendors (not post-hoc)
|
||||
- [ ] Reference check questions are included
|
||||
- [ ] Recommendation includes risks and conditions, not just a winner
|
||||
- [ ] Runner-up rationale explains why they lost (enables future conversations)
|
||||
- [ ] Contract terms to negotiate are specified
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Help me evaluate vendors for [procurement]"
|
||||
- "Create a vendor scorecard for [software/service]"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: workshop-facilitation-guide
|
||||
description: "Design and facilitate any workshop, working session, or collaborative meeting. Use when asked to plan a workshop, design a facilitated session, run a ideation session, or create a workshop agenda. Produces a complete facilitation guide with session design, activity instructions, timing, and materials."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Workshop Facilitation Guide Skill
|
||||
|
||||
Produces a complete facilitation guide for any workshop — from a 90-minute problem-solving session to a full-day strategy workshop. Includes step-by-step activity instructions and facilitation moves for when things go off track.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
Ask the user for these if not provided:
|
||||
- **Workshop goal** (what decision or output should exist at the end?)
|
||||
- **Participants** (number, roles, mix of seniority)
|
||||
- **Duration** (90 min / half day / full day / multi-day)
|
||||
- **Format** (in-person / remote / hybrid)
|
||||
- **Known tensions** (optional — pre-existing conflicts or disagreements to navigate)
|
||||
- **Non-negotiables** (anything that cannot be decided or changed in the room)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Workshop Facilitation Guide: [Session Name]
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** [TBD / as provided]
|
||||
**Duration:** [X hours]
|
||||
**Participants:** [N people, roles]
|
||||
**Format:** [In-person / Remote / Hybrid]
|
||||
**Facilitator:** [Leave for user]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Workshop Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
By the end of this session, the group will have:
|
||||
1. [Specific output 1 — e.g. "Agreed on the top 3 priorities for Q3"]
|
||||
2. [Specific output 2]
|
||||
3. [Specific output 3]
|
||||
|
||||
**How we will know it worked:** [Observable test for success — e.g. "Everyone can name the agreed priorities without looking at their notes"]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Workshop Preparation
|
||||
|
||||
**Facilitator:**
|
||||
- [ ] Confirm objectives with session sponsor (30 min pre-read call recommended)
|
||||
- [ ] Send pre-read to participants [X days before] — max 2 pages
|
||||
- [ ] Prepare all materials (printed / Miro boards / slides)
|
||||
- [ ] Set up room or virtual space
|
||||
|
||||
**Participants (pre-work):**
|
||||
- [Specific pre-work — max 20 minutes. If more, fewer people do it]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Full Agenda
|
||||
|
||||
| Time | Activity | Duration | Format | Output |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| [00:00] | Welcome and framing | 10 min | Facilitator-led | Shared expectations |
|
||||
| [00:10] | [Activity 1] | [X min] | [Format] | [Output] |
|
||||
| [00:X] | [Activity 2] | [X min] | [Format] | [Output] |
|
||||
| [00:X] | Break | 15 min | — | — |
|
||||
| [00:X] | [Activity 3] | [X min] | [Format] | [Output] |
|
||||
| [00:X] | Decisions and next steps | 20 min | Whole group | Committed actions |
|
||||
| [00:X] | Close | 10 min | Facilitator-led | Energy and commitment |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Activity Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
For each activity:
|
||||
|
||||
### Activity [N]: [Name]
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** [Why this activity at this moment]
|
||||
**Time:** [X minutes]
|
||||
**Format:** [Individual / Pairs / Small groups / Whole group]
|
||||
**Materials:** [Post-its, Miro, printed sheets, etc.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Instructions to give participants:**
|
||||
> "[Exact words to say when launching the activity — unambiguous, no jargon]"
|
||||
|
||||
**Step-by-step:**
|
||||
1. [What happens in minute 0–X]
|
||||
2. [What happens next]
|
||||
3. [How to consolidate and move forward]
|
||||
|
||||
**If the group gets stuck:** [Specific facilitation move — e.g. "Ask each person to write one idea silently before sharing"]
|
||||
**Watch out for:** [Common failure mode — e.g. "One voice dominating. Use round-robin to surface quieter participants"]
|
||||
**Time warning:** [What to do if running long — e.g. "Skip the prioritisation vote and let facilitator propose the top 3"]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision-Making Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
Agree this with the group at the start:
|
||||
|
||||
**How decisions will be made in this session:**
|
||||
- [ ] Consensus (everyone must actively agree)
|
||||
- [ ] Consent (no one has a blocking objection)
|
||||
- [ ] Majority vote (50%+1)
|
||||
- [ ] Facilitator/sponsor decides after hearing input
|
||||
|
||||
**What happens with unresolved disagreements:** [Parking lot / escalate to sponsor / decide by [person] after session]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Facilitation Moves (Quick Reference)
|
||||
|
||||
| Situation | Move |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Silence after a question | "Take 2 minutes to write your thoughts before we share" |
|
||||
| One person dominating | "Let's hear from someone we haven't heard from yet" |
|
||||
| Off-topic tangent | "That's important — let me put it in the parking lot. Back to [focus]" |
|
||||
| Group stuck, no ideas | "What would [competitor / different industry] do here?" |
|
||||
| No consensus, running out of time | "Let's do a quick dot vote to identify the strongest options" |
|
||||
| Energy low after lunch | "Stand up and tell the person next to you your one key takeaway so far" |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Close: Commitments and Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
End every session with:
|
||||
1. **What did we decide?** — Read back every decision made. Ask: "Does anyone have a concern with how I've captured this?"
|
||||
2. **What will we do?** — Specific actions, named owners, concrete deadlines
|
||||
3. **Who needs to know?** — Who will communicate outputs to absent stakeholders, and how?
|
||||
4. **When do we meet again?** — Schedule the follow-up before the room empties
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Workshop objective is a specific output, not a vague goal ("aligned on strategy")
|
||||
- [ ] All activities have explicit timing and format
|
||||
- [ ] A decision-making protocol is agreed at the start
|
||||
- [ ] Activities alternate between individual work and group work
|
||||
- [ ] Parking lot is used actively (not a graveyard)
|
||||
- [ ] Close captures decisions and actions before the room empties
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
|
||||
- "Design a workshop for [goal] with [group]"
|
||||
- "Plan a facilitated session to [outcome]"
|
||||
- "Help me run a [type] workshop with my team"
|
||||
- "Create a facilitation guide for [topic]"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user