fix: sync all skill updates and new skills into plugin bundles

- Synced 97 existing skill SKILL.md files from skills/ to their plugin bundle copies
- Added 7 new skills to plugin bundles:
  - seo-content-brief, media-pitch -> pm-gtm
  - tax-planning-checklist -> pm-finance
  - change-management-plan -> pm-hr
  - sales-forecasting-model -> pm-sales
  - workshop-facilitation-guide -> pm-operations
  - teaching-lesson-plan -> pm-cross

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

plugins/pm-strategy/skills/stakeholder-influence-mapper/SKILL.md

@@ -1,38 +1,29 @@
 ---
 name: stakeholder-influence-mapper
-description: Maps stakeholders for a product decision and produces a tailored 
-influence strategy with draft talking points. Use when user needs to "get 
-alignment", "build consensus", "get buy-in from engineering or finance or legal", 
-"present to stakeholders", or "navigate organisational resistance".
-metadata:
-  author: Mohit Aggarwal
-  version: 1.0.0
-  category: stakeholder-communication
-  tags: [stakeholders, influence, communication, alignment]
-  documentation: https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
+description: "Map stakeholders for a product decision and produce a tailored influence strategy with talking points. Use when asked to get alignment, build consensus, get buy-in from engineering or finance or legal, navigate organisational resistance, or plan stakeholder conversations for a major initiative. Produces a stakeholder map, recommended conversation sequence, and tailored talking points per stakeholder."
 ---
+
 # Stakeholder Influence Mapper Skill
 
-## Purpose
-Turn a product initiative into a structured influence plan — who needs to be 
-aligned, in what order, and exactly what to say to each person in their language.
+Turn a product initiative into a structured influence plan — who needs to be aligned, in what order, and exactly what to say to each person in their language.
 
 ## Required Inputs
-- Initiative description (what you want to do and why)
-- List of key stakeholders involved (name, role, relationship to initiative)
-- Timeline pressure (when do you need a decision?)
-- Any known objections or political context
+
+Ask the user for these if not provided:
+- **Initiative description** (what you want to do and why)
+- **List of key stakeholders** (name, role, relationship to initiative)
+- **Timeline pressure** (when do you need a decision?)
+- **Any known objections or political context** (what you're already aware of)
 
 ## Process
-1. Build stakeholder map with: role, primary concern, decision authority 
-   (blocker / influencer / informed), current stance (supportive / neutral / 
-   resistant / unknown)
+1. Build stakeholder map with: role, primary concern, decision authority (blocker / influencer / informed), current stance (supportive / neutral / resistant / unknown)
 2. Identify the critical path of conversations — who must be won before others
 3. For each stakeholder, lead with their concern, not your ask
 4. Prepare one likely objection per stakeholder and a prepared response
 5. Flag any stakeholders who should NOT be approached until others are aligned
+6. **Validate** — Confirm every "blocker" stakeholder has a specific tactic (not just "have a conversation"), and that the sequence accounts for political dependencies
 
-## Output Format
+## Output Structure
 
 ### Stakeholder Map: [Initiative Name]
 
@@ -59,3 +50,11 @@ aligned, in what order, and exactly what to say to each person in their language
 - Engineering leads want technical feasibility acknowledged first
 - Finance stakeholders want ROI framing before anything else
 - Legal/compliance stakeholders want risk mitigation addressed upfront
+
+## Quality Checks
+
+- [ ] Every blocker has a specific tactic (not just "have a chat")
+- [ ] Conversation sequence accounts for political dependencies
+- [ ] Each stakeholder's talking points lead with their concern, not your agenda
+- [ ] At least one "do not approach until X is aligned" flag is considered
+- [ ] The ask from each stakeholder is a single, specific thing (not a vague "support")