feat: add pm-figma bundle — 10 Figma skills for PMs and designers (v5.1.0, 90 skills total)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: figma-component-audit
|
||||
description: "Audit a Figma component library for consistency, coverage gaps, and naming issues. Use when asked to audit components, review a design system, check component consistency, identify missing components, or assess Figma library health. Produces a structured audit report with issues prioritised by impact, naming recommendations, and a fix plan."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Figma Component Audit Skill
|
||||
|
||||
Produces a structured audit of a Figma component library — identifying inconsistencies, naming problems, coverage gaps, and prioritised recommendations.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- **Component list or description** (paste component names or describe what exists)
|
||||
- **Product type** (mobile app / web app / desktop / multi-platform)
|
||||
- **Design system maturity** (new / growing / mature / legacy)
|
||||
- **Primary concern** (optional)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Audit Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| Dimension | Status | Score |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Naming consistency | Red/Amber/Green | /10 |
|
||||
| Component coverage | | /10 |
|
||||
| Variant completeness | | /10 |
|
||||
| Documentation | | /10 |
|
||||
| Overall health | | /10 |
|
||||
|
||||
**Verdict:** What is the state of this library and the single most important thing to fix?
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Naming Issues
|
||||
|
||||
For each problem:
|
||||
**Issue: [Problem type]**
|
||||
- What is happening: [Specific examples]
|
||||
- Why it matters: [Impact on designers and developers]
|
||||
- Fix: [Exact naming convention to adopt]
|
||||
- Examples: Before / After
|
||||
|
||||
Naming convention to enforce:
|
||||
- Components: PascalCase (NavigationBar)
|
||||
- Variants: Lowercase with slashes (size/large, state/hover)
|
||||
- Pages: All caps (COMPONENTS, FOUNDATIONS)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Coverage Gaps
|
||||
|
||||
| Missing Component | Priority | Why Needed |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| [Component] | High/Medium/Low | [Use case] |
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Variant Completeness Check
|
||||
|
||||
| Component | Default | Hover | Active | Disabled | Error | Missing |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| [Button] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Active, Error |
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Prioritised Fix Plan
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Fix | Effort | Impact | Do First? |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1 | [Fix] | Low/Med/High | High | Yes |
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
- [ ] Naming recommendations have before/after examples
|
||||
- [ ] Coverage gaps are relevant to the product type
|
||||
- [ ] Fix plan is ordered by impact-to-effort ratio
|
||||
- [ ] Variant completeness covers all interactive states
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Audit my Figma component library"
|
||||
- "Review our design system for consistency issues"
|
||||
- "What components are we missing in our Figma library?"
|
||||
- "Our component naming is a mess — help me fix it"
|
||||
- "Do a health check on our Figma components"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user