feat: add pm-figma bundle — 10 Figma skills for PMs and designers (v5.1.0, 90 skills total)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: figma-design-review
|
||||
description: "Run a structured PM design review against product requirements. Use when asked to review a Figma design, check a design against requirements, do a PM design review, or assess whether a design meets the product spec. Produces a requirements coverage check, UX concerns, open questions, and explicit approval status."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Figma Design Review Skill
|
||||
|
||||
Runs a structured PM design review — checking that a design meets product requirements, covers all user flows, and is ready for engineering. This is a requirements-and-outcomes review, not an aesthetic critique.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- **Design description or screen summary**
|
||||
- **Original requirements** (PRD snippet, ticket, or acceptance criteria)
|
||||
- **User flow being designed**
|
||||
- **Review stage** (concept / mid-fidelity / pre-handoff final)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Review Header
|
||||
Feature, review stage, reviewed by, date.
|
||||
**Overall status:** Approved / Approved with changes / Needs revision
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Requirements Coverage Check
|
||||
|
||||
| Requirement | Covered? | Notes |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| [Requirement from PRD] | Yes/No/Partial | [Specific observation] |
|
||||
|
||||
Missing coverage summary: [Requirements not addressed — must resolve before approval]
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. User Flow Completeness
|
||||
|
||||
| Flow step | Designed? | Issues |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| [Step] | Yes/No/Partial | [Issue] |
|
||||
| Error state | Yes/No | |
|
||||
| Empty state | Yes/No | |
|
||||
| Loading state | Yes/No | |
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. PM Concerns
|
||||
|
||||
**[Concern] — Blocking / Should fix / Nice to fix**
|
||||
- What: [Specific observation]
|
||||
- Why it matters: [Business or user impact — not aesthetic preference]
|
||||
- Suggested resolution: [What PM wants to see]
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
| Question | Owner | Needed by |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| [Question] | Designer/Eng/PM | [Date] |
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Approval Decision
|
||||
Approved / Approved with changes (list) / Needs revision (focus area + next review date)
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
- [ ] Every requirement assessed
|
||||
- [ ] All flow states checked (error, empty, loading)
|
||||
- [ ] Concerns are outcome-focused not aesthetic
|
||||
- [ ] Open questions have owners
|
||||
- [ ] Approval status is explicit
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
||||
- "Review this Figma design against the requirements"
|
||||
- "Do a PM design review for [feature]"
|
||||
- "Check if this design meets the product spec"
|
||||
- "Is this design ready to hand off to engineering?"
|
||||
- "What is missing from this design before we can build it?"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user