justin/pm-claude-skills
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(plugins): sync all 171 plugin SKILL.md files with fixed skills/ versions

Browse Source 
Propagates Anti-Patterns sections, description rewrites, Required Inputs
additions, and Quality Checks format fixes from skills/ to matching plugin
SKILL.md copies.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01MuGKn3a3Gbqoe8uM5Lmuqt
This commit is contained in:
Mohit
2026-06-08 13:06:21 +00:00
parent fb85a1cb55
commit affae033fe
171 changed files with 1428 additions and 56 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
plugins/pm-figma/skills/figma-design-review/SKILL.md
+9 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: figma-design-review
description: "Run a structured PM design review against product requirements. Use when asked to review a Figma design, check a design against requirements, do a PM design review, or assess whether a design meets the product spec. Produces a requirements coverage check, UX concerns, open questions, and explicit approval status."
description: "Runs a structured PM design review against product requirements. Use when asked to review a Figma design, check a design against requirements, or assess whether a design meets the product spec. Produces a requirements coverage check, UX concerns, open questions, and an explicit approval status — approved, approved with conditions, or not approved."
---
# Figma Design Review Skill
@@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ Approved / Approved with changes (list) / Needs revision (focus area + next revi
- [ ] Open questions have owners
- [ ] Approval status is explicit
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not review a design without a list of requirements to check against — always ask for the PRD, design brief, or acceptance criteria first
- [ ] Do not give a vague approval status — the decision must be explicitly "approved", "approved with conditions", or "not approved"
- [ ] Do not conflate requirements gaps with UX concerns — track them separately so engineers and designers can act independently
- [ ] Do not raise concerns without suggesting what information is needed to resolve them
- [ ] Do not skip open questions — unresolved assumptions at review time become bugs after engineering handoff
## Example Trigger Phrases
- "Review this Figma design against the requirements"
- "Do a PM design review for [feature]"