feat: 100 skills milestone — 7 new skills + quality improvements across all 93
New skills added: - teaching-lesson-plan: structured lesson plans for any subject/audience/setting - seo-content-brief: complete SEO briefs with intent, competitor gaps, and outline - media-pitch: story-first journalist pitches with angle development framework - change-management-plan: stakeholder analysis, comms strategy, adoption metrics - workshop-facilitation-guide: activity instructions, decision protocols, facilitator moves - sales-forecasting-model: pipeline model, scenario analysis, assumption log - tax-planning-checklist: year-end tax planning across income, pension, CGT, reliefs Quality improvements across all 93 existing skills: - Standardised description format: "Verb the thing. Use when X. Produces Y." - Added Required Inputs section to all skills missing it (prompts for missing info) - Added Quality Checks section to all skills missing it (specific, not generic) - Fixed broken multiline YAML descriptions - Removed non-standard frontmatter keys (tool_integration, metadata blocks) README updated to v6.0.0 with 100-skill count, new skill tables, and article series Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,13 +1,19 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: competitor-signal-tracker
|
||||
description: Analyse competitor moves and surface strategic implications for your product
|
||||
tool_integration: Notion
|
||||
description: "Analyse competitor moves and surface strategic implications for your product. Use when asked to track competitor signals, analyse a competitor announcement, understand what a competitor is doing strategically, or produce a competitive intelligence report. Produces a categorised signal analysis with threat ratings, roadmap implications, and recommended responses."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Competitor Signal Tracker Skill
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
Turn scattered competitor information into structured strategic intelligence — not just "what they did" but "what it means for us."
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
Ask the user for these if not provided:
|
||||
- **Competitor name(s)** and the signals/updates to analyse
|
||||
- **Your product's current roadmap or strategic priorities** (to assess relevance)
|
||||
- **Time period** the signals cover (this week, this month, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
## Signal Categories to Track
|
||||
- **Product signals:** New features, removals, UX changes, beta programmes
|
||||
- **Pricing signals:** Changes to tiers, free limits, enterprise terms
|
||||
@@ -21,8 +27,9 @@ Turn scattered competitor information into structured strategic intelligence —
|
||||
3. Rate strategic threat level: High / Medium / Low / Watch
|
||||
4. Connect to your roadmap: does this accelerate, validate, or challenge any of your bets?
|
||||
5. Recommend a response: Accelerate existing initiative / Deprioritise / Monitor / Investigate further
|
||||
6. **Validate** — Confirm every High threat has a specific recommended response with an owner. "Monitor" is not an acceptable response for High-rated threats.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
## Output Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Intelligence Report — [Date]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -35,4 +42,12 @@ Turn scattered competitor information into structured strategic intelligence —
|
||||
**Recommended Response:** [Action + owner + timeline]
|
||||
|
||||
#### Strategic Summary
|
||||
[2-3 sentences on the overall competitive landscape shift this week/month]
|
||||
[2-3 sentences on the overall competitive landscape shift this period]
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Every signal is categorised (not just described)
|
||||
- [ ] Threat level is justified — not assigned arbitrarily
|
||||
- [ ] High-threat signals have specific recommended responses (not "monitor")
|
||||
- [ ] Implications connect to specific roadmap items or strategic bets
|
||||
- [ ] Strategic summary gives a landscape-level view, not just a list of individual signals
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user