fix(skills): add Anti-Patterns and fix descriptions for remaining skills (batch 3)

Processed 27 skills: teaching-lesson-plan through feature-prioritisation and all figma skills.
Added Anti-Patterns sections to all 27 skills.
Added Quality Checks section to financial-due-diligence (was missing entirely).
Converted user-research-synthesis Quality Standards to binary checkbox format.
Rewrote descriptions for figma-design-critique-pm, figma-design-qa, figma-design-review,
team-health-check, and user-interview-synthesis.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01MuGKn3a3Gbqoe8uM5Lmuqt
This commit is contained in:
Mohit
2026-06-08 13:01:36 +00:00
parent f170eed437
commit fb85a1cb55
27 changed files with 234 additions and 18 deletions
+8
View File
@@ -118,3 +118,11 @@ Recommend building: all Basic features first → Performance features for key us
- [ ] Assumptions used in scoring are documented
- [ ] Stakeholder politics or personal preferences are separated from framework score
- [ ] Prioritisation is anchored to a specific scope (sprint / quarter / launch)
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not score items against different goals — every item in a prioritisation session must be scored against the same objective
- [ ] Do not omit deprioritised items — explicitly listing what was cut and why is as important as the ranked list
- [ ] Do not let stakeholder politics override framework scores without documenting the override and reason
- [ ] Do not mix RICE, ICE, or MoSCoW scores across frameworks in a single session — pick one framework per prioritisation exercise
- [ ] Do not treat the output as final without documenting the assumptions used in scoring — assumptions change, and the list must be revisitable