--- name: stakeholder-influence-mapper description: Maps stakeholders for a product decision and produces a tailored influence strategy with draft talking points. Use when user needs to "get alignment", "build consensus", "get buy-in from engineering or finance or legal", "present to stakeholders", or "navigate organisational resistance". metadata: author: Mohit Aggarwal version: 1.0.0 category: stakeholder-communication tags: [stakeholders, influence, communication, alignment] documentation: https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --- # Stakeholder Influence Mapper Skill ## Purpose Turn a product initiative into a structured influence plan — who needs to be aligned, in what order, and exactly what to say to each person in their language. ## Required Inputs - Initiative description (what you want to do and why) - List of key stakeholders involved (name, role, relationship to initiative) - Timeline pressure (when do you need a decision?) - Any known objections or political context ## Process 1. Build stakeholder map with: role, primary concern, decision authority (blocker / influencer / informed), current stance (supportive / neutral / resistant / unknown) 2. Identify the critical path of conversations — who must be won before others 3. For each stakeholder, lead with their concern, not your ask 4. Prepare one likely objection per stakeholder and a prepared response 5. Flag any stakeholders who should NOT be approached until others are aligned ## Output Format ### Stakeholder Map: [Initiative Name] | Stakeholder | Role | Primary Concern | Authority | Current Stance | |-------------|------|-----------------|-----------|----------------| | [name] | [role] | [concern] | [type] | [stance] | ### Recommended Conversation Sequence 1. **[Name first]** — because [reason they unlock others] 2. **[Name second]** — once [first] is aligned [continue...] ### Talking Points by Stakeholder #### [Stakeholder Name] **Lead with:** [Their concern, not your feature] **Your ask:** [One specific thing you need from them] **Likely objection:** [What they'll push back on] **Prepared response:** [How to address it without being defensive] **What success looks like:** [What alignment from them looks like] ## Notes - Never send the same message to all stakeholders — calibrate every time - Engineering leads want technical feasibility acknowledged first - Finance stakeholders want ROI framing before anything else - Legal/compliance stakeholders want risk mitigation addressed upfront