mohitagw15856
05b6d799f0
Three more learnings from alirezarezvani/claude-skills, applied: 1. SkillCheck validator (scripts/skillcheck.mjs) — validates every SKILL.md against the authoring standard (frontmatter, name/folder match, trigger + produces clauses, required headings) plus tier referential integrity. Errors fail CI; --strict fails on warnings too. New skillcheck.yml workflow and a SkillCheck status badge in the README. Current: 0 errors / 14 advisory warnings across 172 skills. 2. Cursor export platform — build-exports.mjs now generates exports/cursor/<bundle>/<skill>/<skill>.mdc rule files. The PLATFORMS registry now supports per-skill filenames (file as a function). 3. Per-agent installers — scripts/install.sh unifies install for claude/hermes/codex/openclaw/cursor (--link, --target, --dry-run, --list). Curl-able one-liners codex-install.sh, openclaw-install.sh, and cursor-install.sh clone the library and install in a single command. README documents the one-line installs and Cursor exports; CHANGELOG and the authoring standard updated. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
82 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
82 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
description: "Draft a structured legal brief, case summary, or legal argument outline. Use when asked to write a legal brief, case note, legal memo, argument outline, or position paper. Produces a structured document using IRAC format (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion)."
|
|
globs:
|
|
alwaysApply: false
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Legal Brief Skill
|
|
|
|
This skill drafts structured legal briefs and memos using IRAC format — the standard structure for legal writing.
|
|
|
|
## Required Inputs
|
|
- **Brief type** (legal memo / case summary / argument outline / position paper / letter before action)
|
|
- **Legal issue or question**
|
|
- **Jurisdiction** (England & Wales / US / EU / Other)
|
|
- **Relevant facts**
|
|
- **Relevant law or cases** (if known — otherwise flagged as [RESEARCH NEEDED])
|
|
- **Audience** (internal memo / court submission / client letter)
|
|
|
|
## Output Structure
|
|
|
|
### Header
|
|
- **To:** [Recipient]
|
|
- **From:** [Author]
|
|
- **Date:** [Date]
|
|
- **Re:** [Matter reference]
|
|
- **Confidential:** Subject to legal professional privilege
|
|
|
|
### Issue(s)
|
|
One sentence per legal question:
|
|
- Issue 1: Whether X constitutes Y under [law]
|
|
|
|
### Brief Answer
|
|
One sentence per issue — conclusion upfront before analysis.
|
|
|
|
### Facts
|
|
Concise relevant facts only. Flag disputed facts.
|
|
|
|
### Law (Rule)
|
|
- Relevant statute, regulation, or case law
|
|
- How the rule has been interpreted in key cases
|
|
- Flag [RESEARCH NEEDED] where law is not provided
|
|
|
|
### Application
|
|
- Arguments in favour
|
|
- Counter-arguments and responses
|
|
- Areas of uncertainty flagged explicitly
|
|
|
|
### Conclusion
|
|
- Clear answer to each issue
|
|
- Overall recommendation
|
|
- Suggested next steps
|
|
|
|
### Caveats
|
|
What this memo does not cover. What additional research would change the analysis.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
WARNING: This draft requires review by a qualified legal professional. It does not constitute legal advice.
|
|
|
|
## Quality Checks
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Issue is stated as a specific legal question (not a general topic)
|
|
- [ ] Brief answer appears before the analysis (conclusion upfront)
|
|
- [ ] Disputed facts are explicitly flagged
|
|
- [ ] Areas of legal uncertainty are noted (not hidden in confident language)
|
|
- [ ] Caveats section lists what would change the analysis
|
|
- [ ] Disclaimer is included
|
|
|
|
## Anti-Patterns
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Do not present uncertain legal positions with confident language — areas of legal ambiguity must be flagged explicitly, not smoothed over
|
|
- [ ] Do not omit the disclaimer — every legal brief output must include the professional review caveat before the user treats it as advice
|
|
- [ ] Do not structure the brief chronologically — IRAC format (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) must be used regardless of how the user framed the request
|
|
- [ ] Do not cite cases or statutes from memory without flagging them as [REQUIRES VERIFICATION] — hallucinated citations are worse than no citations
|
|
- [ ] Do not conflate jurisdiction — legal positions in England & Wales, US, and EU can differ materially; always confirm jurisdiction before stating the rule
|
|
|
|
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
|
- "Draft a legal memo on [issue]"
|
|
- "Write a legal brief arguing [position]"
|
|
- "Summarise the legal position on [topic]"
|
|
- "Write a letter before action for [situation]"
|