mohitagw15856
05b6d799f0
Three more learnings from alirezarezvani/claude-skills, applied: 1. SkillCheck validator (scripts/skillcheck.mjs) — validates every SKILL.md against the authoring standard (frontmatter, name/folder match, trigger + produces clauses, required headings) plus tier referential integrity. Errors fail CI; --strict fails on warnings too. New skillcheck.yml workflow and a SkillCheck status badge in the README. Current: 0 errors / 14 advisory warnings across 172 skills. 2. Cursor export platform — build-exports.mjs now generates exports/cursor/<bundle>/<skill>/<skill>.mdc rule files. The PLATFORMS registry now supports per-skill filenames (file as a function). 3. Per-agent installers — scripts/install.sh unifies install for claude/hermes/codex/openclaw/cursor (--link, --target, --dry-run, --list). Curl-able one-liners codex-install.sh, openclaw-install.sh, and cursor-install.sh clone the library and install in a single command. README documents the one-line installs and Cursor exports; CHANGELOG and the authoring standard updated. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
82 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
82 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
description: "Review and summarise any contract or legal agreement. Use when asked to review a contract, check an agreement, flag legal risks, or summarise key clauses. Produces a structured review with key terms, flagged clauses, risk rating, and plain English summary. Not a substitute for qualified legal advice."
|
|
globs:
|
|
alwaysApply: false
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Contract Review Skill
|
|
|
|
This skill produces a structured contract review identifying key terms, unusual or high-risk clauses, and a plain English summary. Always include the disclaimer that this is not legal advice.
|
|
|
|
## Required Inputs
|
|
- **Contract text or description** (paste or describe)
|
|
- **Reviewer role** (e.g. the party signing, their legal team, a business owner)
|
|
- **Contract type** (e.g. SaaS agreement, employment contract, NDA, supplier contract)
|
|
- **Key concerns** (optional — e.g. "focus on IP ownership and termination clauses")
|
|
|
|
## Output Structure
|
|
|
|
### 1. Contract Overview
|
|
- **Type:** [Contract type]
|
|
- **Parties:** [Party A and Party B]
|
|
- **Effective date / duration:** [If stated]
|
|
- **Governing law:** [Jurisdiction]
|
|
- **Overall risk rating:** Green Low / Amber Medium / Red High
|
|
|
|
### 2. Key Terms Summary
|
|
|
|
| Term | Detail |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Payment / fees | |
|
|
| Term and renewal | |
|
|
| Termination rights | |
|
|
| Liability cap | |
|
|
| IP ownership | |
|
|
| Confidentiality | |
|
|
| Dispute resolution | |
|
|
|
|
### 3. Flagged Clauses
|
|
|
|
For each flagged clause:
|
|
|
|
**[Risk level] — [Clause name]**
|
|
- **What it says:** [Plain English summary]
|
|
- **Why it matters:** [Risk or implication]
|
|
- **Suggested action:** [Negotiate / Accept / Seek legal advice / Query]
|
|
|
|
### 4. Missing Clauses
|
|
List any standard clauses absent but normally expected for this contract type.
|
|
|
|
### 5. Plain English Summary
|
|
3-5 sentences. What does this contract mean for the party signing it?
|
|
|
|
### 6. Recommended Next Steps
|
|
- [Action 1]
|
|
- [Action 2]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
WARNING: This review is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a qualified solicitor or lawyer before signing any legally binding agreement.
|
|
|
|
## Quality Checks
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Overall risk rating is justified (not just "Medium" without reasons)
|
|
- [ ] All flagged clauses have a specific recommended action (not just "read this")
|
|
- [ ] Missing clauses section is completed for this contract type
|
|
- [ ] Plain English summary can be understood by a non-lawyer
|
|
- [ ] Disclaimer is included
|
|
|
|
## Anti-Patterns
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Do not provide legal advice or suggest the review substitutes for qualified legal counsel
|
|
- [ ] Do not skip flagging unusual or one-sided clauses because they appear standard
|
|
- [ ] Do not omit a plain-English summary — legal jargon alone is not useful output
|
|
- [ ] Do not rate risk without explaining what specifically drives that rating
|
|
- [ ] Do not ignore missing clauses — absence of key protections is itself a risk
|
|
|
|
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
|
- "Review this contract: [paste]"
|
|
- "Flag the key risks in this agreement"
|
|
- "Summarise this SaaS contract in plain English"
|
|
- "What should I watch out for in this supplier agreement?"
|