mohitagw15856
05b6d799f0
Three more learnings from alirezarezvani/claude-skills, applied: 1. SkillCheck validator (scripts/skillcheck.mjs) — validates every SKILL.md against the authoring standard (frontmatter, name/folder match, trigger + produces clauses, required headings) plus tier referential integrity. Errors fail CI; --strict fails on warnings too. New skillcheck.yml workflow and a SkillCheck status badge in the README. Current: 0 errors / 14 advisory warnings across 172 skills. 2. Cursor export platform — build-exports.mjs now generates exports/cursor/<bundle>/<skill>/<skill>.mdc rule files. The PLATFORMS registry now supports per-skill filenames (file as a function). 3. Per-agent installers — scripts/install.sh unifies install for claude/hermes/codex/openclaw/cursor (--link, --target, --dry-run, --list). Curl-able one-liners codex-install.sh, openclaw-install.sh, and cursor-install.sh clone the library and install in a single command. README documents the one-line installs and Cursor exports; CHANGELOG and the authoring standard updated. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
84 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
84 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
description: "Audit a Figma component library for consistency, coverage gaps, and naming issues. Use when asked to audit components, review a design system, check component consistency, identify missing components, or assess Figma library health. Produces a structured audit report with issues prioritised by impact, naming recommendations, and a fix plan."
|
|
globs:
|
|
alwaysApply: false
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Figma Component Audit Skill
|
|
|
|
Produces a structured audit of a Figma component library — identifying inconsistencies, naming problems, coverage gaps, and prioritised recommendations.
|
|
|
|
## Required Inputs
|
|
|
|
- **Component list or description** (paste component names or describe what exists)
|
|
- **Product type** (mobile app / web app / desktop / multi-platform)
|
|
- **Design system maturity** (new / growing / mature / legacy)
|
|
- **Primary concern** (optional)
|
|
|
|
## Output Structure
|
|
|
|
### 1. Audit Summary
|
|
|
|
| Dimension | Status | Score |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| Naming consistency | Red/Amber/Green | /10 |
|
|
| Component coverage | | /10 |
|
|
| Variant completeness | | /10 |
|
|
| Documentation | | /10 |
|
|
| Overall health | | /10 |
|
|
|
|
**Verdict:** What is the state of this library and the single most important thing to fix?
|
|
|
|
### 2. Naming Issues
|
|
|
|
For each problem:
|
|
**Issue: [Problem type]**
|
|
- What is happening: [Specific examples]
|
|
- Why it matters: [Impact on designers and developers]
|
|
- Fix: [Exact naming convention to adopt]
|
|
- Examples: Before / After
|
|
|
|
Naming convention to enforce:
|
|
- Components: PascalCase (NavigationBar)
|
|
- Variants: Lowercase with slashes (size/large, state/hover)
|
|
- Pages: All caps (COMPONENTS, FOUNDATIONS)
|
|
|
|
### 3. Coverage Gaps
|
|
|
|
| Missing Component | Priority | Why Needed |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| [Component] | High/Medium/Low | [Use case] |
|
|
|
|
### 4. Variant Completeness Check
|
|
|
|
| Component | Default | Hover | Active | Disabled | Error | Missing |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| [Button] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Active, Error |
|
|
|
|
### 5. Prioritised Fix Plan
|
|
|
|
| # | Fix | Effort | Impact | Do First? |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 1 | [Fix] | Low/Med/High | High | Yes |
|
|
|
|
## Quality Checks
|
|
- [ ] Naming recommendations have before/after examples
|
|
- [ ] Coverage gaps are relevant to the product type
|
|
- [ ] Fix plan is ordered by impact-to-effort ratio
|
|
- [ ] Variant completeness covers all interactive states
|
|
|
|
## Anti-Patterns
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Do not flag naming issues without providing a specific, consistent naming convention to adopt
|
|
- [ ] Do not audit only visual consistency — also check for missing interactive states and accessibility compliance
|
|
- [ ] Do not list all issues at equal priority — group by impact (Critical / Major / Minor) so the fix plan is actionable
|
|
- [ ] Do not omit variant completeness — every interactive component must cover all required states
|
|
- [ ] Do not leave coverage gaps without recommending specific missing components to add
|
|
|
|
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
|
- "Audit my Figma component library"
|
|
- "Review our design system for consistency issues"
|
|
- "What components are we missing in our Figma library?"
|
|
- "Our component naming is a mess — help me fix it"
|
|
- "Do a health check on our Figma components"
|