Claude
572b8acf8c
Make the library multi-platform without duplicating content. Each skills/<name>/SKILL.md body remains the single source of truth; a new generator renders platform-ready exports from it. - scripts/build-exports.mjs — dependency-free Node generator with a PLATFORMS registry so new platforms (Gemini, Cursor, …) are a few lines. Ships ChatGPT exports at exports/chatgpt/<bundle>/<skill>/SYSTEM_PROMPT.md (172 skills), plus generated index READMEs. Supports --platform and --check. - exports/ — generated ChatGPT system prompts, ready to paste into a Custom GPT. - .github/workflows/check-generated.yml — fails a PR if exports or web/skills.json drift from the source skills. - README "Works With" now documents the ready-to-use exports and regen command. - CHANGELOG + SKILL-AUTHORING-STANDARD note the generated artifacts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px
2.4 KiB
2.4 KiB
Process Documentation Skill
Produces clear, structured process documentation that someone new to a role can follow without needing to ask questions.
Required Inputs
- Process name
- Process description (rough notes are fine)
- Who does this process (roles involved)
- How often it runs (daily / weekly / monthly / event-triggered)
- Tools involved
- Known edge cases
Output Structure
Process: [Process Name]
Owner: [Role] | Frequency: [How often] | Estimated time: [Duration]
Purpose
[1-2 sentences. Why does this process exist? What breaks if it is not done?]
Scope
In scope: [What this covers] Out of scope: [What it does not cover]
Prerequisites
- [Required access or information]
- [Any dependency that must be completed first]
Roles and Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| [Role 1] | [What they do] |
Process Steps
Step 1: [Step name]
- Who: [Role]
- When: [Trigger or timing]
- How: [Substeps numbered]
- Output: [What exists at end of this step]
- Tool: [System used]
[Continue for all steps]
Edge Cases and Exceptions
| Situation | What to do | Who to contact |
|---|---|---|
| [Edge case] | [Action] | [Name/role] |
Common Mistakes
[2-4 things people get wrong the first time]
Escalation Path
[Name/role] → [Next level] → [Final escalation]
Review
Next review due: [Date]
Quality Checks
- Every step has a named role (not "someone" or "the team")
- Edge cases and exceptions table is complete
- Prerequisites are listed so someone new can prepare before starting
- Escalation path is named (specific people or roles, not just "your manager")
- Review date is set
Anti-Patterns
- Do not write steps without specifying who is responsible for each — ownership must be explicit throughout
- Do not omit the escalation path — every process must say what happens when something goes wrong
- Do not document the ideal process if the real process differs — document reality, then note improvements separately
- Do not skip edge cases and exceptions — they are where most process failures actually occur
- Do not produce documentation without a review date — undated process docs quickly become incorrect
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Document this process: [description]"
- "Write a process guide for [workflow]"
- "Map out how [process] works"