Files
pm-claude-skills/skills/data-analysis-standard/SKILL.md
T
mohitagw15856 f3b9d008fe feat: 100 skills milestone — 7 new skills + quality improvements across all 93
New skills added:
- teaching-lesson-plan: structured lesson plans for any subject/audience/setting
- seo-content-brief: complete SEO briefs with intent, competitor gaps, and outline
- media-pitch: story-first journalist pitches with angle development framework
- change-management-plan: stakeholder analysis, comms strategy, adoption metrics
- workshop-facilitation-guide: activity instructions, decision protocols, facilitator moves
- sales-forecasting-model: pipeline model, scenario analysis, assumption log
- tax-planning-checklist: year-end tax planning across income, pension, CGT, reliefs

Quality improvements across all 93 existing skills:
- Standardised description format: "Verb the thing. Use when X. Produces Y."
- Added Required Inputs section to all skills missing it (prompts for missing info)
- Added Quality Checks section to all skills missing it (specific, not generic)
- Fixed broken multiline YAML descriptions
- Removed non-standard frontmatter keys (tool_integration, metadata blocks)

README updated to v6.0.0 with 100-skill count, new skill tables, and article series

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-20 20:52:31 +01:00

4.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

name, description
name description
data-analysis-standard Structure a product data analysis, metric deep-dive, funnel analysis, or cohort study. Use when asked to analyse product metrics, investigate a drop in conversion, explain a data change to stakeholders, or find the root cause of a metric movement. Produces a structured analysis with question, root cause, confidence level, and recommended action.

Data Analysis Standard Skill

Turn raw numbers into product decisions. Structure every analysis with a clear question, methodology, finding, and recommended action.

Analysis Framework: The 4-Question Method

Every analysis starts here:

  1. What changed? (describe the metric and its movement)
  2. Why did it change? (root cause — segment, funnel step, cohort, channel)
  3. So what? (business or product impact)
  4. Now what? (recommended action with confidence level)

Never deliver data without answering all four. A chart with no narrative is not an analysis.


Metric Triage Template

Use when a metric has moved unexpectedly:

METRIC: [Name]
MOVEMENT: [X% change over Y period]
BASELINE: [What was normal]

SEGMENTATION CHECK:
- By platform (iOS / Android / Web)?
- By user cohort (new / returning / power users)?
- By acquisition channel?
- By geography?
- By plan/tier?

ROOT CAUSE HYPOTHESIS:
1. [Most likely explanation] — Evidence: [data point]
2. [Alternative explanation] — Evidence: [data point]
3. [Ruling out] — Eliminated because: [reason]

CONCLUSION: [Single sentence answer to "why did this change?"]
CONFIDENCE: [High / Medium / Low] — based on [data available]

Funnel Analysis Structure

Stage Metric Current Benchmark/Target Drop-off % Notes
[Top of funnel] [Users] [N] [N]
[Step 2] [Users] [N] [N] [X%]
[Step 3] [Users] [N] [N] [X%]
[Conversion] [Users] [N] [N] [X%]

Biggest drop-off: [Step X → Step Y] — Hypothesis: [reason] Recommended investigation: [specific query or test]


Cohort Analysis Guidelines

Always define:

  • Cohort definition: [What groups users — signup week, first action, plan type]
  • Retention metric: [What counts as retained — login, core action, revenue]
  • Retention window: [D1, D7, D30, W4, M3, etc.]

Output a cohort retention table and annotate:

  • Baseline retention for each cohort
  • Cohorts that over/underperform and why (feature launch? campaign? seasonal?)
  • Trend direction across cohorts (improving / declining / stable)

Stakeholder Analysis Output Format

[Analysis Title] — [Date]

Question being answered: [Specific question in plain English] Time period: [Date range] Data source: [Where data comes from]

Finding:

[12 sentence plain-English summary of what the data shows]

Key chart / table: [Include or describe]

Root cause: [Best explanation with evidence]

Confidence level: [High / Medium / Low] — [reason]

Recommended action:

  1. [Immediate action — owner, timeline]
  2. [Investigation needed — what to check next]
  3. [Monitoring — what metric to watch and at what cadence]

What this analysis does NOT tell us: [Important caveat — what data is missing or what can't be concluded]


Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Metric or question being investigated
  • Time period (what changed, from when to when)
  • Data available (which segments, sources, or queries you have access to)
  • Business context (what decision this analysis informs)
  • Audience (who will read this — exec / team / data team)

Quality Checks

  • Analysis answers all 4 questions: what changed, why, so what, now what
  • Root cause has evidence (not just hypothesis)
  • Confidence level is stated and justified
  • What the data cannot tell us is explicitly named
  • Recommended action includes an owner and timeline

Guidelines

  • Always state what the data cannot tell you — never oversell confidence
  • Correlations are not causation — flag this every time
  • If the user has no baseline, recommend establishing one before drawing conclusions
  • Recommend the simplest chart for each finding: bar for comparison, line for trends, scatter for correlation, table for detailed breakdowns
  • Always specify the time window — "conversion dropped" is meaningless without "from X to Y over Z period"