Files
pm-claude-skills/skills/pricing-strategy/SKILL.md
T
mohitagw15856 f3b9d008fe feat: 100 skills milestone — 7 new skills + quality improvements across all 93
New skills added:
- teaching-lesson-plan: structured lesson plans for any subject/audience/setting
- seo-content-brief: complete SEO briefs with intent, competitor gaps, and outline
- media-pitch: story-first journalist pitches with angle development framework
- change-management-plan: stakeholder analysis, comms strategy, adoption metrics
- workshop-facilitation-guide: activity instructions, decision protocols, facilitator moves
- sales-forecasting-model: pipeline model, scenario analysis, assumption log
- tax-planning-checklist: year-end tax planning across income, pension, CGT, reliefs

Quality improvements across all 93 existing skills:
- Standardised description format: "Verb the thing. Use when X. Produces Y."
- Added Required Inputs section to all skills missing it (prompts for missing info)
- Added Quality Checks section to all skills missing it (specific, not generic)
- Fixed broken multiline YAML descriptions
- Removed non-standard frontmatter keys (tool_integration, metadata blocks)

README updated to v6.0.0 with 100-skill count, new skill tables, and article series

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-20 20:52:31 +01:00

5.5 KiB
Raw Blame History

name, description
name description
pricing-strategy Structure pricing strategy decisions, packaging options, and tier design for SaaS and digital products. Use when reviewing or setting pricing, designing pricing tiers, evaluating freemium vs paid, or preparing a pricing change. Produces a pricing strategy recommendation with model rationale, tier structure, competitive positioning, and rollout plan.

Pricing Strategy Skill

Build pricing that reflects value delivered — not cost to build. Structure every pricing decision with customer segmentation, value metric identification, competitive context, and a packaging recommendation.

Pricing Foundations

Three questions to answer before any pricing decision:

  1. Who is our buyer? (Role, company size, willingness to pay)
  2. What value do we deliver? (Quantifiable outcome — time saved, revenue generated, risk reduced)
  3. What is our pricing model? (Per seat, usage-based, flat, hybrid)

Pricing Models

Model Best For Risk
Per Seat Collaboration tools, team software Disincentivises adoption as team grows
Usage-Based APIs, infrastructure, consumption tools Revenue unpredictability for both sides
Flat Rate Simple tools, early-stage Leaves money on table from power users
Tiered Products with clear user segments Feature gatekeeping frustrates users
Freemium Viral/PLG products with low marginal cost Conversion to paid is hard to engineer
Value-Based Enterprise, outcomes-driven products Requires strong ROI story

Freemium Decision Framework

Use freemium when:

  • Marginal cost per free user is near zero
  • Product is inherently viral (network effects or sharing)
  • Free tier creates genuine value (not just a demo)
  • Clear upgrade trigger exists (feature, volume, or team size)
  • Conversion benchmark is realistic (25% free-to-paid is typical)

Avoid freemium when:

  • Support cost per free user is high
  • No natural upgrade trigger in the product
  • Core value requires features you'd need to gate

Packaging / Tiering Framework

Recommended 3-tier structure for SaaS:

Tier Target Price Signal Key Features Lock-in Mechanism
Free / Starter Individual, early discovery $0 Core value, usage-limited Invite colleagues, export limit
Pro / Growth SMB, growing teams $[X]/seat/mo Full features, higher limits Team collaboration, integrations
Business / Enterprise Mid-market, enterprise $[X]/seat/mo or custom Admin, SSO, SLAs, dedicated support Security, compliance, volume

Tier design rules:

  • Each tier should be genuinely sufficient for its target segment
  • The upgrade trigger should be felt naturally — not manufactured
  • Price jumps of 35x between tiers are normal and defensible

Competitive Pricing Context

Competitor Model Price Key Differentiator
[Name] [Model] [Price] [What they lead with]

Positioning options:

  • Premium: Price 2040% above market. Justify with enterprise features, support, or brand.
  • Parity: Match the market leader. Win on product or distribution.
  • Value: Price below market. Win on volume. Dangerous without strong unit economics.

Output Format

Pricing Strategy Recommendation — [Product] — [Date]

Current State: [What pricing exists today, if any] Problem to Solve: [Why pricing is being reviewed]

Recommended Pricing Model: [Model name + rationale]

Value Metric: [The single unit that scales with customer value — e.g., "active users", "API calls", "documents processed"]

Proposed Tiers:

[Table using 3-tier structure above]

Free-to-Paid Upgrade Trigger: [Specific moment or threshold that creates natural upgrade pressure]

Competitive Position: [Premium / Parity / Value + reasoning]

Pricing Change Rollout (if applicable):

  • Grandfathering: [Yes / No — recommendation and rationale]
  • Communication plan: [How to tell customers + timing]
  • Rollback plan: [Under what conditions you'd revert]

Risks:

  • [Risk] → Mitigation: [Action]

Metrics to Monitor Post-Change:

  • Conversion rate (free to paid)
  • Churn rate by tier
  • Average revenue per user (ARPU)
  • Expansion revenue

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Product or service being priced
  • Current pricing (if any — and why it's being reviewed)
  • Target customer segments (size, role, willingness to pay)
  • Key competitors and their pricing (if known)
  • Business model (SaaS / Marketplace / Usage-based / Other)
  • Primary goal (grow adoption / increase ARPU / reduce churn / new market entry)

Quality Checks

  • Value metric is defined (the unit that scales with customer value)
  • Free-to-paid upgrade trigger is specific (not "when they need more")
  • Competitive positioning is chosen and justified (premium / parity / value)
  • Pricing change rollout plan includes grandfathering decision
  • Counter-metrics are defined to catch perverse incentives
  • Risks have specific mitigations (not just listed)

Guidelines

  • Never price based on cost — price based on value delivered to the customer
  • Always A/B test price changes where possible; use geographic holdouts if A/B isn't feasible
  • Recommend annual pricing with 1520% discount — improves cash flow and reduces churn
  • If enterprise pricing is "contact us", recommend adding a price floor to qualify inbound