Files
pm-claude-skills/skills/stakeholder-influence-mapper/SKILL.md
T
mohitagw15856 f3b9d008fe feat: 100 skills milestone — 7 new skills + quality improvements across all 93
New skills added:
- teaching-lesson-plan: structured lesson plans for any subject/audience/setting
- seo-content-brief: complete SEO briefs with intent, competitor gaps, and outline
- media-pitch: story-first journalist pitches with angle development framework
- change-management-plan: stakeholder analysis, comms strategy, adoption metrics
- workshop-facilitation-guide: activity instructions, decision protocols, facilitator moves
- sales-forecasting-model: pipeline model, scenario analysis, assumption log
- tax-planning-checklist: year-end tax planning across income, pension, CGT, reliefs

Quality improvements across all 93 existing skills:
- Standardised description format: "Verb the thing. Use when X. Produces Y."
- Added Required Inputs section to all skills missing it (prompts for missing info)
- Added Quality Checks section to all skills missing it (specific, not generic)
- Fixed broken multiline YAML descriptions
- Removed non-standard frontmatter keys (tool_integration, metadata blocks)

README updated to v6.0.0 with 100-skill count, new skill tables, and article series

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-20 20:52:31 +01:00

3.0 KiB

name, description
name description
stakeholder-influence-mapper Map stakeholders for a product decision and produce a tailored influence strategy with talking points. Use when asked to get alignment, build consensus, get buy-in from engineering or finance or legal, navigate organisational resistance, or plan stakeholder conversations for a major initiative. Produces a stakeholder map, recommended conversation sequence, and tailored talking points per stakeholder.

Stakeholder Influence Mapper Skill

Turn a product initiative into a structured influence plan — who needs to be aligned, in what order, and exactly what to say to each person in their language.

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Initiative description (what you want to do and why)
  • List of key stakeholders (name, role, relationship to initiative)
  • Timeline pressure (when do you need a decision?)
  • Any known objections or political context (what you're already aware of)

Process

  1. Build stakeholder map with: role, primary concern, decision authority (blocker / influencer / informed), current stance (supportive / neutral / resistant / unknown)
  2. Identify the critical path of conversations — who must be won before others
  3. For each stakeholder, lead with their concern, not your ask
  4. Prepare one likely objection per stakeholder and a prepared response
  5. Flag any stakeholders who should NOT be approached until others are aligned
  6. Validate — Confirm every "blocker" stakeholder has a specific tactic (not just "have a conversation"), and that the sequence accounts for political dependencies

Output Structure

Stakeholder Map: [Initiative Name]

Stakeholder Role Primary Concern Authority Current Stance
[name] [role] [concern] [type] [stance]
  1. [Name first] — because [reason they unlock others]
  2. [Name second] — once [first] is aligned [continue...]

Talking Points by Stakeholder

[Stakeholder Name]

Lead with: [Their concern, not your feature] Your ask: [One specific thing you need from them] Likely objection: [What they'll push back on] Prepared response: [How to address it without being defensive] What success looks like: [What alignment from them looks like]

Notes

  • Never send the same message to all stakeholders — calibrate every time
  • Engineering leads want technical feasibility acknowledged first
  • Finance stakeholders want ROI framing before anything else
  • Legal/compliance stakeholders want risk mitigation addressed upfront

Quality Checks

  • Every blocker has a specific tactic (not just "have a chat")
  • Conversation sequence accounts for political dependencies
  • Each stakeholder's talking points lead with their concern, not your agenda
  • At least one "do not approach until X is aligned" flag is considered
  • The ask from each stakeholder is a single, specific thing (not a vague "support")