mohitagw15856
036511ab3e
Broadens both reach (more tools) and content types (an MCP server), continuing the multi-platform story. Windsurf + Aider: - build-exports.mjs gains two platforms: exports/windsurf/*.md (workspace rules, trigger: model_decision) and exports/aider/*.md (conventions for `aider --read`). Now 5 platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Aider). - install.sh + bin/cli.mjs install both (windsurf -> .windsurf/rules, aider -> .aider/skills with a --read hint); generated README index is excluded from copies. - One-line windsurf-install.sh / aider-install.sh wrappers for parity. MCP server (new content type): - mcp/server.mjs — zero-dependency stdio MCP server exposing list_skills, search_skills, get_skill. Published as a second bin (pm-claude-skills-mcp). Logs to stderr; reads bundled skills/ at startup. mcp/README.md documents client config. Also: README hero "See it in action" demo placement (ready to swap in a GIF; recording guide in web/docs-assets/README.md), Works-With table + exports + install docs updated, CHANGELOG Unreleased. package.json files/bin updated. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.4 KiB
2.4 KiB
Process Documentation Skill
Produces clear, structured process documentation that someone new to a role can follow without needing to ask questions.
Required Inputs
- Process name
- Process description (rough notes are fine)
- Who does this process (roles involved)
- How often it runs (daily / weekly / monthly / event-triggered)
- Tools involved
- Known edge cases
Output Structure
Process: [Process Name]
Owner: [Role] | Frequency: [How often] | Estimated time: [Duration]
Purpose
[1-2 sentences. Why does this process exist? What breaks if it is not done?]
Scope
In scope: [What this covers] Out of scope: [What it does not cover]
Prerequisites
- [Required access or information]
- [Any dependency that must be completed first]
Roles and Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| [Role 1] | [What they do] |
Process Steps
Step 1: [Step name]
- Who: [Role]
- When: [Trigger or timing]
- How: [Substeps numbered]
- Output: [What exists at end of this step]
- Tool: [System used]
[Continue for all steps]
Edge Cases and Exceptions
| Situation | What to do | Who to contact |
|---|---|---|
| [Edge case] | [Action] | [Name/role] |
Common Mistakes
[2-4 things people get wrong the first time]
Escalation Path
[Name/role] → [Next level] → [Final escalation]
Review
Next review due: [Date]
Quality Checks
- Every step has a named role (not "someone" or "the team")
- Edge cases and exceptions table is complete
- Prerequisites are listed so someone new can prepare before starting
- Escalation path is named (specific people or roles, not just "your manager")
- Review date is set
Anti-Patterns
- Do not write steps without specifying who is responsible for each — ownership must be explicit throughout
- Do not omit the escalation path — every process must say what happens when something goes wrong
- Do not document the ideal process if the real process differs — document reality, then note improvements separately
- Do not skip edge cases and exceptions — they are where most process failures actually occur
- Do not produce documentation without a review date — undated process docs quickly become incorrect
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Document this process: [description]"
- "Write a process guide for [workflow]"
- "Map out how [process] works"