mohitagw15856
05b6d799f0
Three more learnings from alirezarezvani/claude-skills, applied: 1. SkillCheck validator (scripts/skillcheck.mjs) — validates every SKILL.md against the authoring standard (frontmatter, name/folder match, trigger + produces clauses, required headings) plus tier referential integrity. Errors fail CI; --strict fails on warnings too. New skillcheck.yml workflow and a SkillCheck status badge in the README. Current: 0 errors / 14 advisory warnings across 172 skills. 2. Cursor export platform — build-exports.mjs now generates exports/cursor/<bundle>/<skill>/<skill>.mdc rule files. The PLATFORMS registry now supports per-skill filenames (file as a function). 3. Per-agent installers — scripts/install.sh unifies install for claude/hermes/codex/openclaw/cursor (--link, --target, --dry-run, --list). Curl-able one-liners codex-install.sh, openclaw-install.sh, and cursor-install.sh clone the library and install in a single command. README documents the one-line installs and Cursor exports; CHANGELOG and the authoring standard updated. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
72 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
72 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
||
description: "Scores features using both RICE and strategic alignment for nuanced prioritisation. Use when asked to prioritise features, build a priority matrix, combine quantitative scoring with strategic fit, or decide what to build next with multiple competing initiatives. Produces a scored priority matrix with RICE scores, strategic alignment ratings, quadrant placement, and sequencing recommendations."
|
||
globs:
|
||
alwaysApply: false
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# RICE + Strategic Alignment Skill
|
||
|
||
Produce a prioritisation output that balances quantitative RICE scoring with qualitative strategic fit — because the highest RICE score isn't always the right next bet.
|
||
|
||
## Required Inputs
|
||
|
||
Ask the user for these if not provided:
|
||
- **List of initiatives or features to prioritise** (names and brief descriptions)
|
||
- **Current strategic priorities or OKRs** (needed to rate strategic alignment)
|
||
- **Reach estimates** (users affected per quarter — even rough estimates work)
|
||
- **Effort estimates** (person-months — from engineering if available)
|
||
- **Quarter or planning period**
|
||
|
||
## Two-Stage Process
|
||
|
||
### Stage 1: RICE Scoring
|
||
- Reach: Users affected per quarter
|
||
- Impact: 3/2/1/0.5/0.25 scale
|
||
- Confidence: 100% / 80% / 50%
|
||
- Effort: Person-months
|
||
- RICE = (R × I × C) / E
|
||
|
||
### Stage 2: Strategic Alignment Score
|
||
Rate each initiative against your current strategic priorities (provided as input):
|
||
- Directly supports top OKR: +3
|
||
- Supports secondary OKR: +2
|
||
- Neutral: +1
|
||
- Contradicts strategic direction: -1
|
||
|
||
### Final Priority Score
|
||
Combined Score = RICE Score + (Strategic Alignment × 10)
|
||
|
||
**Validate** — Flag any initiative where RICE score and strategic alignment conflict sharply (e.g., high RICE, low alignment). These require an explicit team conversation before sequencing.
|
||
|
||
## Output Structure
|
||
|
||
### Priority Matrix — [Quarter]
|
||
| Initiative | RICE Score | Strategic Alignment | Combined Score | Quadrant | Recommendation |
|
||
|------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------|----------|----------------|
|
||
| [name] | [score] | [score] | [combined] | [Now/Next/Later/Drop] | [action] |
|
||
|
||
#### Quadrant Definitions
|
||
- **Now:** High RICE + High Strategic Alignment → Build this quarter
|
||
- **Next:** High RICE + Lower Alignment → Queue for next quarter
|
||
- **Later:** Lower RICE + High Alignment → Revisit when capacity allows
|
||
- **Drop:** Low RICE + Low Alignment → Remove from backlog
|
||
|
||
#### Recommendations
|
||
[Top 5 initiatives with rationale for sequencing]
|
||
|
||
## Quality Checks
|
||
|
||
- [ ] All RICE components have an estimate (even if low confidence — flag those)
|
||
- [ ] Strategic alignment is rated against specific OKRs, not general "feels strategic"
|
||
- [ ] Conflicts between RICE rank and strategic alignment are explicitly flagged
|
||
- [ ] "Drop" recommendations are specific — not just "low priority, deprioritise"
|
||
- [ ] Confidence levels on estimates are noted where weak (drives the 50% confidence flag)
|
||
|
||
## Anti-Patterns
|
||
|
||
- [ ] Do not treat the combined score as a definitive ranking — use it to structure a conversation, not replace one
|
||
- [ ] Do not rate strategic alignment as "high" because an initiative feels important without mapping it to a specific OKR
|
||
- [ ] Do not place all initiatives in the "Now" quadrant — a matrix with no "Drop" recommendations is not credible
|
||
- [ ] Do not ignore the conflict flag when RICE rank and strategic alignment sharply diverge
|
||
- [ ] Do not accept 100% confidence on estimates that have not been validated with data
|