Files
pm-claude-skills/exports/windsurf/pm-figma/figma-component-audit/figma-component-audit.md
T
mohitagw15856 036511ab3e Windsurf + Aider targets, MCP server, and demo placement (#33)
Broadens both reach (more tools) and content types (an MCP server), continuing
the multi-platform story.

Windsurf + Aider:
- build-exports.mjs gains two platforms: exports/windsurf/*.md (workspace rules,
  trigger: model_decision) and exports/aider/*.md (conventions for `aider --read`).
  Now 5 platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Aider).
- install.sh + bin/cli.mjs install both (windsurf -> .windsurf/rules, aider ->
  .aider/skills with a --read hint); generated README index is excluded from copies.
- One-line windsurf-install.sh / aider-install.sh wrappers for parity.

MCP server (new content type):
- mcp/server.mjs — zero-dependency stdio MCP server exposing list_skills,
  search_skills, get_skill. Published as a second bin (pm-claude-skills-mcp).
  Logs to stderr; reads bundled skills/ at startup. mcp/README.md documents
  client config.

Also: README hero "See it in action" demo placement (ready to swap in a GIF;
recording guide in web/docs-assets/README.md), Works-With table + exports +
install docs updated, CHANGELOG Unreleased. package.json files/bin updated.


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-17 23:15:38 +01:00

3.0 KiB

trigger, description
trigger description
model_decision Audit a Figma component library for consistency, coverage gaps, and naming issues. Use when asked to audit components, review a design system, check component consistency, identify missing components, or assess Figma library health. Produces a structured audit report with issues prioritised by impact, naming recommendations, and a fix plan.

Figma Component Audit Skill

Produces a structured audit of a Figma component library — identifying inconsistencies, naming problems, coverage gaps, and prioritised recommendations.

Required Inputs

  • Component list or description (paste component names or describe what exists)
  • Product type (mobile app / web app / desktop / multi-platform)
  • Design system maturity (new / growing / mature / legacy)
  • Primary concern (optional)

Output Structure

1. Audit Summary

Dimension Status Score
Naming consistency Red/Amber/Green /10
Component coverage /10
Variant completeness /10
Documentation /10
Overall health /10

Verdict: What is the state of this library and the single most important thing to fix?

2. Naming Issues

For each problem: Issue: [Problem type]

  • What is happening: [Specific examples]
  • Why it matters: [Impact on designers and developers]
  • Fix: [Exact naming convention to adopt]
  • Examples: Before / After

Naming convention to enforce:

  • Components: PascalCase (NavigationBar)
  • Variants: Lowercase with slashes (size/large, state/hover)
  • Pages: All caps (COMPONENTS, FOUNDATIONS)

3. Coverage Gaps

Missing Component Priority Why Needed
[Component] High/Medium/Low [Use case]

4. Variant Completeness Check

Component Default Hover Active Disabled Error Missing
[Button] Yes Yes No Yes No Active, Error

5. Prioritised Fix Plan

# Fix Effort Impact Do First?
1 [Fix] Low/Med/High High Yes

Quality Checks

  • Naming recommendations have before/after examples
  • Coverage gaps are relevant to the product type
  • Fix plan is ordered by impact-to-effort ratio
  • Variant completeness covers all interactive states

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not flag naming issues without providing a specific, consistent naming convention to adopt
  • Do not audit only visual consistency — also check for missing interactive states and accessibility compliance
  • Do not list all issues at equal priority — group by impact (Critical / Major / Minor) so the fix plan is actionable
  • Do not omit variant completeness — every interactive component must cover all required states
  • Do not leave coverage gaps without recommending specific missing components to add

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Audit my Figma component library"
  • "Review our design system for consistency issues"
  • "What components are we missing in our Figma library?"
  • "Our component naming is a mess — help me fix it"
  • "Do a health check on our Figma components"