2.5 KiB
2.5 KiB
name: stakeholder-influence-mapper description: Maps stakeholders for a product decision and produces a tailored influence strategy with draft talking points. Use when user needs to "get alignment", "build consensus", "get buy-in from engineering or finance or legal", "present to stakeholders", or "navigate organisational resistance". metadata: author: Mohit Aggarwal version: 1.0.0 category: stakeholder-communication tags: [stakeholders, influence, communication, alignment] documentation: https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Stakeholder Influence Mapper Skill
Purpose
Turn a product initiative into a structured influence plan — who needs to be aligned, in what order, and exactly what to say to each person in their language.
Required Inputs
- Initiative description (what you want to do and why)
- List of key stakeholders involved (name, role, relationship to initiative)
- Timeline pressure (when do you need a decision?)
- Any known objections or political context
Process
- Build stakeholder map with: role, primary concern, decision authority (blocker / influencer / informed), current stance (supportive / neutral / resistant / unknown)
- Identify the critical path of conversations — who must be won before others
- For each stakeholder, lead with their concern, not your ask
- Prepare one likely objection per stakeholder and a prepared response
- Flag any stakeholders who should NOT be approached until others are aligned
Output Format
Stakeholder Map: [Initiative Name]
| Stakeholder | Role | Primary Concern | Authority | Current Stance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [name] | [role] | [concern] | [type] | [stance] |
Recommended Conversation Sequence
- [Name first] — because [reason they unlock others]
- [Name second] — once [first] is aligned [continue...]
Talking Points by Stakeholder
[Stakeholder Name]
Lead with: [Their concern, not your feature] Your ask: [One specific thing you need from them] Likely objection: [What they'll push back on] Prepared response: [How to address it without being defensive] What success looks like: [What alignment from them looks like]
Notes
- Never send the same message to all stakeholders — calibrate every time
- Engineering leads want technical feasibility acknowledged first
- Finance stakeholders want ROI framing before anything else
- Legal/compliance stakeholders want risk mitigation addressed upfront