v1.0
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Create a sales-ready competitive battlecard — positioning, feature comparison, objection handling, and win strategies
|
||||
argument-hint: "<your product> vs <competitor>"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /battlecard -- Competitive Battlecard
|
||||
|
||||
Create a concise, sales-ready battlecard that helps your team win deals against a specific competitor. Includes positioning, feature comparison, objection handling, and conversation strategies.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/battlecard Our CRM vs Salesforce
|
||||
/battlecard ProjectFlow vs Monday.com for mid-market teams
|
||||
/battlecard [upload competitor materials or win/loss data]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Identify the Matchup
|
||||
|
||||
Ask:
|
||||
- Your product and the specific competitor
|
||||
- Who is the typical buyer choosing between you?
|
||||
- Do you have win/loss data or sales feedback?
|
||||
- What deal stage does this typically come up? (early evaluation, final decision, displacement)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Research the Competitor
|
||||
|
||||
Apply the **competitive-battlecard** skill with web research:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current product capabilities and recent launches
|
||||
- Pricing model and published pricing
|
||||
- Target market and positioning
|
||||
- Known weaknesses (from reviews, forums, customer feedback)
|
||||
- Recent company news (funding, leadership, strategy shifts)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Generate Battlecard
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Competitive Battlecard: [Your Product] vs [Competitor]
|
||||
|
||||
**Last updated**: [today]
|
||||
**Use when**: [situation where this competitor comes up]
|
||||
|
||||
### Quick Summary
|
||||
**We win when**: [buyer profile and situation where you have advantage]
|
||||
**We lose when**: [buyer profile and situation where competitor has advantage]
|
||||
**Key differentiator**: [one sentence]
|
||||
|
||||
### Positioning
|
||||
**How they position**: [their messaging]
|
||||
**How we position against them**: [our counter-positioning]
|
||||
|
||||
### Feature Comparison
|
||||
| Capability | Us | Them | Verdict |
|
||||
|-----------|-----|------|---------|
|
||||
| [capability] | [status] | [status] | [advantage] |
|
||||
|
||||
### Pricing Comparison
|
||||
| Dimension | Us | Them | Notes |
|
||||
|----------|-----|------|-------|
|
||||
|
||||
### Objection Handling
|
||||
| Objection | Response | Proof Point |
|
||||
|----------|---------|------------|
|
||||
| "They have [feature]" | [response] | [evidence] |
|
||||
| "They're cheaper" | [response] | [TCO analysis] |
|
||||
| "They're more established" | [response] | [counter] |
|
||||
|
||||
### Landmines to Plant
|
||||
[Questions to ask the prospect that expose competitor weaknesses]
|
||||
1. "Ask them about [topic] — their answer will reveal [weakness]"
|
||||
|
||||
### Trap Questions to Expect
|
||||
[Questions the competitor will encourage the prospect to ask you]
|
||||
1. "[Question]" — How to respond: [response]
|
||||
|
||||
### Win/Loss Patterns
|
||||
**We typically win because**: [top 3 reasons]
|
||||
**We typically lose because**: [top 3 reasons]
|
||||
|
||||
### Conversation Starters
|
||||
**If they're already using [Competitor]**:
|
||||
- [approach for displacement deals]
|
||||
|
||||
**If they're evaluating both**:
|
||||
- [approach for competitive evaluations]
|
||||
|
||||
### Resources
|
||||
- [Customer story / case study that counters this competitor]
|
||||
- [Third-party comparison or review]
|
||||
- [Demo script optimized for this competitive situation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Save as markdown.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Offer Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- "Want me to **create battlecards for other competitors**?"
|
||||
- "Should I **run a full competitive analysis** of the market?"
|
||||
- "Want me to **draft customer-facing comparison content** based on this?"
|
||||
- "Should I **update the positioning** based on competitive insights?"
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Battlecards should be updated quarterly — competitors change fast
|
||||
- "Landmines" are the most valuable section for sales — teach reps what questions to ask
|
||||
- Never trash the competitor in front of the prospect — position on your strengths, not their weaknesses
|
||||
- Win/loss data from real deals is worth 10x any analysis — encourage the user to add it
|
||||
- Keep it to one page equivalent — sales reps won't read a 10-page document during a call
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user