v1.0
This commit is contained in:
Pawel Huryn
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: porters-five-forces
|
||||
description: "Perform Porter's Five Forces analysis evaluating competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants. Triggers: Porter's five forces, competitive forces, industry analysis."
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Porter's Five Forces
|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- **Name**: porters-five-forces
|
||||
- **Description**: Perform a Porter's Five Forces analysis evaluating competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants.
|
||||
- **Triggers**: Porter's five forces, competitive forces, industry analysis, market forces, competitive dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
You are a competitive strategist conducting a Porter's Five Forces analysis for $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||
|
||||
Your task is to evaluate the structural attractiveness of an industry and identify the competitive dynamics that will determine profitability.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Requirements
|
||||
- Industry or market definition
|
||||
- Current competitors and competitive positioning
|
||||
- Supplier and customer landscape
|
||||
- Potential substitutes and new entrants
|
||||
- Product or service specifics
|
||||
|
||||
## Porter's Five Forces Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Competitive Rivalry (How intense is competition?)
|
||||
The degree to which companies compete directly for market share and customers.
|
||||
|
||||
**High Rivalry When:**
|
||||
- Many competitors of similar size and strength
|
||||
- Slow industry growth (zero-sum competition)
|
||||
- Low product differentiation (commoditized)
|
||||
- High fixed costs (pressure to maintain volume)
|
||||
- Exit barriers are high (expensive to leave)
|
||||
- Price competition is intense
|
||||
- Rivals have diverse strategies and goals
|
||||
- Emotional or strategic commitments keep rivals fighting
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Rivalry When:**
|
||||
- Few competitors
|
||||
- High growth market
|
||||
- High differentiation (less price-sensitive)
|
||||
- Low fixed costs
|
||||
- Low switching costs for competitors
|
||||
- Industry leader has clear dominance
|
||||
- Rivals are cooperative or have compatible goals
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Implications:**
|
||||
- Assess competitive positioning and differentiation
|
||||
- Define defensible competitive advantages
|
||||
- Monitor competitor moves and market consolidation
|
||||
- Invest in differentiation or cost leadership
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Supplier Power (How much power do suppliers have?)
|
||||
The ability of suppliers to increase prices or reduce quality, affecting your profitability.
|
||||
|
||||
**High Supplier Power When:**
|
||||
- Few suppliers or concentrated supplier base
|
||||
- Switching costs are high (changing suppliers is expensive)
|
||||
- Backward integration threat (suppliers become competitors)
|
||||
- Suppliers' product is critical or unique
|
||||
- Suppliers have strong bargaining position
|
||||
- No substitutes for supplier offerings
|
||||
- Suppliers sell to many industries (less dependent on you)
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Supplier Power When:**
|
||||
- Many suppliers available
|
||||
- Low switching costs
|
||||
- Suppliers depend on your business
|
||||
- Commodity products (interchangeable suppliers)
|
||||
- Threat of forward integration (you become your own supplier)
|
||||
- Available substitutes for supplier offerings
|
||||
- You have significant bargaining leverage
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Implications:**
|
||||
- Diversify supplier base to reduce dependency
|
||||
- Build strong supplier relationships
|
||||
- Consider vertical integration or alternatives
|
||||
- Negotiate long-term contracts with favorable terms
|
||||
- Invest in suppliers' success (partnerships)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Buyer Power (How much power do customers have?)
|
||||
The ability of customers to negotiate lower prices or demand higher quality, affecting your margin.
|
||||
|
||||
**High Buyer Power When:**
|
||||
- Few large customers (concentrated demand)
|
||||
- Buyers switch easily and often (low switching costs)
|
||||
- Backwards integration threat (customers become competitors)
|
||||
- Product is undifferentiated (commoditized)
|
||||
- Buyers have price sensitivity or tight budgets
|
||||
- Buyers have full information about alternatives
|
||||
- Customers can bypass you entirely
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Buyer Power When:**
|
||||
- Many fragmented customers
|
||||
- High switching costs (lock-in, integration, training)
|
||||
- High product differentiation (fewer alternatives)
|
||||
- Customers depend on your product
|
||||
- You have strong brand or reputation
|
||||
- Switching to alternatives involves risk
|
||||
- Customers lack information about alternatives
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Implications:**
|
||||
- Build strong customer relationships and loyalty
|
||||
- Create switching costs through integration
|
||||
- Invest in brand and differentiation
|
||||
- Develop customer success programs
|
||||
- Create network effects or communities
|
||||
- Segment customers by willingness to pay
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Threat of Substitutes (Are there alternative solutions?)
|
||||
The risk that customers will switch to alternative products that solve the same problem.
|
||||
|
||||
**High Threat When:**
|
||||
- Good substitutes exist and are easily accessible
|
||||
- Substitutes have similar performance or better value
|
||||
- Switching costs to substitutes are low
|
||||
- Customers are willing to try alternatives
|
||||
- Substitutes are improving faster than your product
|
||||
- Price-to-performance of substitutes is attractive
|
||||
- Substitute technology is disruptive or emerging
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Threat When:**
|
||||
- No good substitutes exist
|
||||
- Substitutes are more expensive or inferior
|
||||
- Switching costs are high
|
||||
- Your product is deeply integrated into customer workflows
|
||||
- Customer preference and loyalty are strong
|
||||
- Barrier to substitute entry are high
|
||||
- Your product solves the problem uniquely
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Implications:**
|
||||
- Monitor emerging substitutes and disruptive technologies
|
||||
- Build customer stickiness through integration and loyalty
|
||||
- Invest in product innovation and improvement
|
||||
- Create switching costs through ecosystem or community
|
||||
- Diversify into adjacent or complementary products
|
||||
- Defend through brand, service, or convenience
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Threat of New Entrants (Can new competitors easily enter?)
|
||||
The risk that new competitors will enter the market and capture share.
|
||||
|
||||
**High Threat When:**
|
||||
- Low barriers to entry (capital, expertise, licensing)
|
||||
- Attractive industry margins and growth
|
||||
- Incumbents are vulnerable or complacent
|
||||
- Distribution or channel access is available
|
||||
- Economies of scale are limited
|
||||
- Network effects are weak or absent
|
||||
- Regulation is permissive
|
||||
- New technologies enable disruption
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Threat When:**
|
||||
- High barriers to entry (capital, IP, expertise, relationships)
|
||||
- Entrenched incumbents with scale advantages
|
||||
- Strong network effects or switching costs
|
||||
- Brand loyalty is high
|
||||
- Regulatory or licensing barriers exist
|
||||
- Economies of scale create cost advantage
|
||||
- Control of critical resources or distribution
|
||||
- Retaliation by incumbents is credible
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Implications:**
|
||||
- Build defensible barriers (IP, brand, network effects)
|
||||
- Establish cost leadership and scale advantages
|
||||
- Create switching costs and customer lock-in
|
||||
- Invest in brand and customer relationships
|
||||
- Monitor startups and disruptors in your space
|
||||
- Build alliances and control key resources
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Process
|
||||
1. Assess each of the five forces (High, Medium, Low)
|
||||
2. Rate industry attractiveness (High rivalry + strong forces = less attractive)
|
||||
3. For each force, identify:
|
||||
- Current state and trend (getting stronger/weaker)
|
||||
- Key players or dynamics
|
||||
- Implications for profitability
|
||||
4. Prioritize the 2-3 forces most critical to your strategy
|
||||
5. Develop strategic responses:
|
||||
- How can we reduce threat of high-power forces?
|
||||
- How can we leverage weak forces for advantage?
|
||||
6. Identify competitive positioning opportunities
|
||||
7. Create strategic initiatives aligned with force analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Industry Attractiveness
|
||||
- **Attractive**: Low rivalry, weak supplier/buyer power, few substitutes, high entry barriers
|
||||
- **Unattractive**: High rivalry, strong supplier/buyer power, many substitutes, low entry barriers
|
||||
- **Moderate**: Mixed dynamics requiring strategic differentiation
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- No industry is universally attractive or unattractive; position matters
|
||||
- Same industry can be attractive for some companies, unattractive for others
|
||||
- Forces change over time; re-assess as market evolves
|
||||
- Use Porter's Five Forces with SWOT and PESTLE for comprehensive analysis
|
||||
- Strategy should directly address the highest-force threats
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Further Reading
|
||||
|
||||
- [The Product Management Frameworks Compendium + Templates](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user