feat(pm-product-strategy): add seven-powers skill
Adds Hamilton Helmer's 7 Powers framework skill for assessing durable competitive advantage (scale economies, network effects, counter- positioning, switching costs, branding, cornered resource, process power). Updates skill counts and descriptions across marketplace.json, plugin.json, and READMEs. Merged from louzhedong:codex/add-seven-powers-skill (PR vs phuryn/pm-skills). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KcEyZ9gTqwkoiDBfW4fVzu
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
|
|||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"name": "pm-product-strategy",
|
"name": "pm-product-strategy",
|
||||||
"description": "Product strategy skills for PMs: vision, strategy canvas, value propositions, lean canvas, business model canvas, SWOT, PESTLE, Ansoff Matrix, Porter's Five Forces, and monetization.",
|
"description": "Product strategy skills for PMs: vision, strategy canvas, value propositions, lean canvas, business model canvas, SWOT, PESTLE, Ansoff Matrix, Porter's Five Forces, Seven Powers, and monetization.",
|
||||||
"source": "./pm-product-strategy",
|
"source": "./pm-product-strategy",
|
||||||
"category": "product-management"
|
"category": "product-management"
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
# PM Skills Marketplace: The AI Operating System for Better Product Decisions
|
# PM Skills Marketplace: The AI Operating System for Better Product Decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> 68 PM skills and 42 chained workflows across 9 plugins. Claude Code, Cowork, and more. From discovery to strategy, execution, launch, growth, and shipping AI-built code.
|
> 69 PM skills and 42 chained workflows across 9 plugins. Claude Code, Cowork, and more. From discovery to strategy, execution, launch, growth, and shipping AI-built code.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||

|

|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -180,11 +180,11 @@ Commands:
|
|||||||
</details>
|
</details>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<details>
|
<details>
|
||||||
<summary><strong>2. pm-product-strategy</strong> — Vision, business models, pricing, competitive landscape (12 skills, 5 commands)</summary>
|
<summary><strong>2. pm-product-strategy</strong> — Vision, business models, pricing, competitive landscape (13 skills, 5 commands)</summary>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Product strategy, vision, business models, pricing, and macro environment analysis. Covers the full strategic toolkit from vision crafting through competitive landscape scanning.
|
Product strategy, vision, business models, pricing, and macro environment analysis. Covers the full strategic toolkit from vision crafting through competitive landscape scanning.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Skills (12):**
|
**Skills (13):**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- `product-strategy` — Comprehensive 9-section Product Strategy Canvas (vision → defensibility)
|
- `product-strategy` — Comprehensive 9-section Product Strategy Canvas (vision → defensibility)
|
||||||
- `startup-canvas` — Startup Canvas combining Product Strategy (9 sections) + Business Model — an alternative to BMC and Lean Canvas for new products
|
- `startup-canvas` — Startup Canvas combining Product Strategy (9 sections) + Business Model — an alternative to BMC and Lean Canvas for new products
|
||||||
@@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ Product strategy, vision, business models, pricing, and macro environment analys
|
|||||||
- `swot-analysis` — SWOT analysis with actionable recommendations
|
- `swot-analysis` — SWOT analysis with actionable recommendations
|
||||||
- `pestle-analysis` — Macro environment: Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental
|
- `pestle-analysis` — Macro environment: Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental
|
||||||
- `porters-five-forces` — Competitive forces analysis (rivalry, suppliers, buyers, substitutes, new entrants)
|
- `porters-five-forces` — Competitive forces analysis (rivalry, suppliers, buyers, substitutes, new entrants)
|
||||||
|
- `seven-powers` — Durable competitive advantage analysis across scale economies, network effects, counter-positioning, switching costs, branding, cornered resource, and process power
|
||||||
- `ansoff-matrix` — Growth strategy mapping across markets and products
|
- `ansoff-matrix` — Growth strategy mapping across markets and products
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Commands (5):**
|
**Commands (5):**
|
||||||
@@ -213,6 +214,7 @@ Skills:
|
|||||||
- `Compare Lean Canvas vs Business Model Canvas vs Startup Canvas for my marketplace startup`
|
- `Compare Lean Canvas vs Business Model Canvas vs Startup Canvas for my marketplace startup`
|
||||||
- `Design a value proposition for our AI writing assistant targeting non-native English speakers`
|
- `Design a value proposition for our AI writing assistant targeting non-native English speakers`
|
||||||
- `Run a Porter's Five Forces analysis for the project management SaaS market`
|
- `Run a Porter's Five Forces analysis for the project management SaaS market`
|
||||||
|
- `Assess whether our vertical AI agent has a durable competitive moat`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Commands:
|
Commands:
|
||||||
- `/strategy B2B project management tool for agencies`
|
- `/strategy B2B project management tool for agencies`
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"name": "pm-product-strategy",
|
"name": "pm-product-strategy",
|
||||||
"version": "2.0.0",
|
"version": "2.0.0",
|
||||||
"description": "Product strategy skills for PMs: vision, strategy canvas, value propositions, lean canvas, business model canvas, SWOT, PESTLE, Ansoff Matrix, Porter's Five Forces, and monetization.",
|
"description": "Product strategy skills for PMs: vision, strategy canvas, value propositions, lean canvas, business model canvas, SWOT, PESTLE, Ansoff Matrix, Porter's Five Forces, Seven Powers, and monetization.",
|
||||||
"author": {
|
"author": {
|
||||||
"name": "Paweł Huryn",
|
"name": "Paweł Huryn",
|
||||||
"email": "pawel@productcompass.pm",
|
"email": "pawel@productcompass.pm",
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|||||||
# pm-product-strategy
|
# pm-product-strategy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Product strategy skills for PMs: vision, strategy canvas, startup canvas, value propositions, lean canvas, business model canvas, SWOT, PESTLE, Ansoff Matrix, Porter's Five Forces, pricing, and monetization.
|
Product strategy skills for PMs: vision, strategy canvas, startup canvas, value propositions, lean canvas, business model canvas, SWOT, PESTLE, Ansoff Matrix, Porter's Five Forces, Seven Powers, pricing, and monetization.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Skills (12)
|
## Skills (13)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **ansoff-matrix** — Generate an Ansoff Matrix analysis mapping growth strategies across market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification.
|
- **ansoff-matrix** — Generate an Ansoff Matrix analysis mapping growth strategies across market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification.
|
||||||
- **business-model** — Generate a Business Model Canvas with all 9 building blocks.
|
- **business-model** — Generate a Business Model Canvas with all 9 building blocks.
|
||||||
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Product strategy skills for PMs: vision, strategy canvas, startup canvas, value
|
|||||||
- **pricing-strategy** — Analyze and design pricing strategies including pricing models, competitive pricing analysis, willingness-to-pay estimation, and price elasticity considerations.
|
- **pricing-strategy** — Analyze and design pricing strategies including pricing models, competitive pricing analysis, willingness-to-pay estimation, and price elasticity considerations.
|
||||||
- **product-strategy** — Generate a comprehensive product strategy using the 9-section Product Strategy Canvas covering vision, segments, costs, value propositions, trade-offs, metrics, growth, capabilities, and defensibility.
|
- **product-strategy** — Generate a comprehensive product strategy using the 9-section Product Strategy Canvas covering vision, segments, costs, value propositions, trade-offs, metrics, growth, capabilities, and defensibility.
|
||||||
- **product-vision** — Brainstorm an inspiring, achievable, and emotional product vision that motivates teams.
|
- **product-vision** — Brainstorm an inspiring, achievable, and emotional product vision that motivates teams.
|
||||||
|
- **seven-powers** — Assess durable competitive advantage using Hamilton Helmer's 7 Powers framework: scale economies, network effects, counter-positioning, switching costs, branding, cornered resource, and process power.
|
||||||
- **startup-canvas** — Generate a Startup Canvas combining Product Strategy (9 sections) and Business Model (Cost Structure + Revenue Streams) for a new product. An alternative to Business Model Canvas and Lean Canvas that separates strategy from business model.
|
- **startup-canvas** — Generate a Startup Canvas combining Product Strategy (9 sections) and Business Model (Cost Structure + Revenue Streams) for a new product. An alternative to Business Model Canvas and Lean Canvas that separates strategy from business model.
|
||||||
- **swot-analysis** — Perform a detailed SWOT analysis identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with actionable recommendations.
|
- **swot-analysis** — Perform a detailed SWOT analysis identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with actionable recommendations.
|
||||||
- **value-proposition** — Generate a detailed value proposition using a 6-part JTBD template (Who, Why, What before, How, What after, Alternatives).
|
- **value-proposition** — Generate a detailed value proposition using a 6-part JTBD template (Who, Why, What before, How, What after, Alternatives).
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
name: seven-powers
|
||||||
|
description: "Assess durable competitive advantage using Hamilton Helmer's 7 Powers framework — scale economies, network effects, counter-positioning, switching costs, branding, cornered resource, and process power. Use when evaluating defensibility, competitive moats, or long-term strategic advantage."
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
# Seven Powers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Metadata
|
||||||
|
- **Name**: seven-powers
|
||||||
|
- **Description**: Assess durable competitive advantage using Hamilton Helmer's 7 Powers framework and identify which powers a product has, lacks, or should build.
|
||||||
|
- **Triggers**: seven powers, competitive moat, defensibility, durable advantage, structural advantage, Helmer, power assessment
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Instructions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
You are a competitive strategy advisor applying Hamilton Helmer's 7 Powers framework to $ARGUMENTS.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Your task is to identify whether the product or company has a durable competitive advantage, where that advantage is weak, and which structural powers are worth building next.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Input Requirements
|
||||||
|
- Product, company, or business line being assessed
|
||||||
|
- Market category and main competitors
|
||||||
|
- Customer segments and buying context
|
||||||
|
- Current traction, scale, distribution, or usage data
|
||||||
|
- Existing assets, capabilities, partnerships, or constraints
|
||||||
|
- Strategic question: current defensibility, future moat building, investment decision, or strategy red team
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Core Principle
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A power requires both:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Benefit**: the advantage creates superior economics, customer preference, or strategic leverage.
|
||||||
|
- **Barrier**: competitors cannot easily copy the advantage without time, cost, self-harm, coordination problems, or unavailable resources.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If there is benefit without barrier, treat it as temporary differentiation, not a true power. If there is barrier without customer or economic benefit, treat it as complexity, not advantage.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Seven Powers Framework
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 1. Scale Economies
|
||||||
|
Per-unit costs decline as volume increases, letting the company price lower, invest more, or earn better margins than smaller competitors.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Evidence to look for:**
|
||||||
|
- High fixed costs spread across a growing customer base
|
||||||
|
- Procurement, infrastructure, data, or operating costs improving with volume
|
||||||
|
- Competitors needing similar scale before matching unit economics
|
||||||
|
- Ability to reinvest cost advantage into product, price, distribution, or service
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Common false positives:**
|
||||||
|
- Revenue growth without improving unit economics
|
||||||
|
- Scale that competitors can rent through cloud, marketplaces, or vendors
|
||||||
|
- Cost advantage that disappears in a narrow segment
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 2. Network Effects
|
||||||
|
The product becomes more valuable as more users, participants, data contributors, or complementary partners join.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Evidence to look for:**
|
||||||
|
- User value increases with other users or contributors
|
||||||
|
- Cross-side reinforcement in marketplaces or platforms
|
||||||
|
- Data, integrations, plugins, or community assets improving with participation
|
||||||
|
- Difficulty for a new entrant to bootstrap the same network density
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Common false positives:**
|
||||||
|
- A large user base with no user-to-user value loop
|
||||||
|
- Social proof that helps acquisition but does not improve product value
|
||||||
|
- Network value that can be recreated by importing contacts or data
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 3. Counter-Positioning
|
||||||
|
A new business model creates an advantage incumbents cannot copy without damaging their existing economics, channels, brand, or organizational commitments.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Evidence to look for:**
|
||||||
|
- Incumbents would cannibalize profitable revenue by copying the model
|
||||||
|
- The challenger wins because it embraces a lower-margin, simpler, open, or self-serve model
|
||||||
|
- Incumbent sales, pricing, or operating structures conflict with the new approach
|
||||||
|
- Delay by incumbents is rational, not just poor execution
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Common false positives:**
|
||||||
|
- A feature incumbents can copy without self-harm
|
||||||
|
- Lower price without a structurally different model
|
||||||
|
- "They are slow" as the only barrier
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 4. Switching Costs
|
||||||
|
Customers face meaningful cost, risk, effort, data loss, workflow disruption, or political friction when moving to an alternative.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Evidence to look for:**
|
||||||
|
- Deep workflow integration, migration cost, compliance review, or training investment
|
||||||
|
- Accumulated data, history, configurations, automations, or institutional knowledge
|
||||||
|
- Multi-stakeholder adoption that makes replacement politically expensive
|
||||||
|
- Contractual, technical, or operational lock-in paired with ongoing value
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Common false positives:**
|
||||||
|
- Customers stay only because competitors are unknown
|
||||||
|
- Lock-in that creates resentment and weakens retention over time
|
||||||
|
- Setup effort that is painful once but not durable
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 5. Branding
|
||||||
|
The brand creates preference, trust, reduced perceived risk, or willingness to pay that competitors cannot quickly replicate.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Evidence to look for:**
|
||||||
|
- Customers choose the product because of reputation, trust, status, safety, or category leadership
|
||||||
|
- Brand reduces sales friction or supports premium pricing
|
||||||
|
- Consistent associations built over time through product experience and market memory
|
||||||
|
- Preference persists even when competitors offer similar functional benefits
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Common false positives:**
|
||||||
|
- Awareness without preference
|
||||||
|
- Aesthetic polish without trust or pricing power
|
||||||
|
- Paid acquisition visibility mistaken for brand strength
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 6. Cornered Resource
|
||||||
|
The company has preferential access to a scarce asset, capability, relationship, data source, talent pool, license, location, or supply that competitors cannot obtain on similar terms.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Evidence to look for:**
|
||||||
|
- Exclusive or hard-to-replicate access to a critical resource
|
||||||
|
- Proprietary data, rights, partnerships, distribution, or talent
|
||||||
|
- Resource scarcity that matters to customer value or unit economics
|
||||||
|
- Competitors face high cost, delay, or impossibility in acquiring equivalent access
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Common false positives:**
|
||||||
|
- Resources that are unique but not strategically important
|
||||||
|
- Partnerships that are non-exclusive or easily replaced
|
||||||
|
- Data volume without quality, rights, or usage advantage
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 7. Process Power
|
||||||
|
The company has embedded operational excellence, routines, judgment, or coordination that competitors cannot copy because it is tacit, cumulative, and culturally reinforced.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Evidence to look for:**
|
||||||
|
- Superior performance from repeated operating routines, not one-off heroics
|
||||||
|
- Know-how distributed across teams, tools, incentives, and culture
|
||||||
|
- Process quality that compounds over time and is hard to document fully
|
||||||
|
- Competitors can observe the output but not reproduce the system
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Common false positives:**
|
||||||
|
- A checklist competitors can copy
|
||||||
|
- A strong team without a repeatable operating system
|
||||||
|
- Temporary execution quality from urgency rather than embedded capability
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Output Process
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Define the market and competitor set.
|
||||||
|
2. Summarize the product's current strategic position.
|
||||||
|
3. Score each power as **Strong**, **Emerging**, **Weak**, or **None**.
|
||||||
|
4. For each power, separate:
|
||||||
|
- Benefit: what advantage it creates
|
||||||
|
- Barrier: why competitors cannot easily copy it
|
||||||
|
- Evidence: facts, examples, or assumptions behind the rating
|
||||||
|
- Gaps: what would need to become true for the power to strengthen
|
||||||
|
5. Identify the 1-2 most credible current powers.
|
||||||
|
6. Identify the 1-2 most promising powers to build next.
|
||||||
|
7. Highlight vulnerabilities where the product has differentiation but no durable barrier.
|
||||||
|
8. Recommend strategic moves that build or reinforce powers.
|
||||||
|
9. List validation signals to monitor over the next 30-90 days.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Output Template
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```markdown
|
||||||
|
## Seven Powers Assessment: [Product / Company]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Executive Summary
|
||||||
|
[3-5 sentences: current defensibility, strongest power, biggest vulnerability, best power to build next.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Power Ratings
|
||||||
|
| Power | Rating | Benefit | Barrier | Evidence | Key Gap |
|
||||||
|
|-------|--------|---------|---------|----------|---------|
|
||||||
|
| Scale Economies | Strong / Emerging / Weak / None | | | | |
|
||||||
|
| Network Effects | Strong / Emerging / Weak / None | | | | |
|
||||||
|
| Counter-Positioning | Strong / Emerging / Weak / None | | | | |
|
||||||
|
| Switching Costs | Strong / Emerging / Weak / None | | | | |
|
||||||
|
| Branding | Strong / Emerging / Weak / None | | | | |
|
||||||
|
| Cornered Resource | Strong / Emerging / Weak / None | | | | |
|
||||||
|
| Process Power | Strong / Emerging / Weak / None | | | | |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Strongest Current Power
|
||||||
|
[Name the strongest power and explain the benefit/barrier pair.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Most Promising Power to Build
|
||||||
|
[Name the next power worth building and why it fits the product's stage, market, and resources.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Competitive Vulnerabilities
|
||||||
|
- [Where competitors can copy, undercut, bypass, or neutralize the current strategy.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Strategic Moves
|
||||||
|
1. [Move that reinforces an existing power]
|
||||||
|
2. [Move that creates evidence for an emerging power]
|
||||||
|
3. [Move that reduces a vulnerability]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Signals to Monitor
|
||||||
|
| Signal | Why It Matters | Check Frequency |
|
||||||
|
|--------|----------------|-----------------|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Notes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Use Seven Powers after Porter's Five Forces when you need to move from industry pressure to company-specific defensibility.
|
||||||
|
- Use it with Product Strategy Canvas when answering the "Can't/Won't" section: why competitors cannot or will not copy the strategy.
|
||||||
|
- Treat powers as structural advantages, not slogans. Require evidence for both benefit and barrier.
|
||||||
|
- Early-stage products may have no strong powers yet. In that case, focus on which power the strategy is designed to build.
|
||||||
|
- Do not recommend all seven powers. Most strong strategies concentrate on one or two.
|
||||||
|
- Be explicit about uncertainty. If evidence is missing, call it an assumption and propose how to test it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Further Reading
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [The Product Management Frameworks Compendium + Templates](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium)
|
||||||
|
- [7 Powers: The Foundations of Business Strategy](https://7powers.com/)
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user