A multi-agent audit of every doc against the code surfaced ~50 stale/missing
items (the roadmap/status docs and the backlog had fallen behind the code).
This catches them up:
- CLAUDE.md: phase status was ~3 phases stale ("Phase 1 is next" while Phase 1 +
chunks of 2 & 4 shipped). Rewrote the status list; added a model-provider
tech-stack entry; updated repo-layout (integrations objectstore/models,
deploy backup.sh/dev compose).
- ARCHITECTURE.md: §6 privacy engine described 3 visibility levels — corrected to
the shipped 4 (adds site_members); documented per-tree AI policy on Tree,
LLMProvider/EmbeddingProvider split + registry, ChangeProposal origin/status/
operations, verified-email session gate, instance-owner role, schema-drift
guard, and the env_file config model.
- PRD.md: 4-level visibility in US-040/§5.5, instance-owner role (§5.1/§5.11),
per-tree AI policy (§5.8), §8 sequencing annotated with shipped status, header
date/status bumped.
- README.md: 4-level privacy; softened "Full GEDCOM 7" to the 5.5.1/7 common
subset; noted backups + instance-owner admin; moved property/land to an
explicit "where it's headed" (no property models exist yet).
- BACKLOG.md: flipped ~15 shipped-but-open rows to Have (ChangeProposal, provider
abstraction, GEDCOM citation export, membership management, operator backup,
email-verification gate, per-tree AI policy, instance owner, the whole
visibility/public-viewing/child-resource-redaction cluster #41-#51/#46), and
reconciled the executive summary, "current defects" list, quick wins, and
differentiators. Left genuinely-open items (citation/source redaction, sitemap,
per-tree noindex, scoped-token API) accurately open.
- .env.example: dropped "SMTP wired in a later phase"; documented the worker
purge knobs, S3_PRESIGN_TTL, COOKIE_NAME; removed a stray duplicate line.
- design/: tree-visibility.md and change-proposal.md marked Shipped; corrected
the redaction approach (reuses member schemas, not a separate PublicPersonRead)
and the apply() rollback claim (v1 is not cross-op transactional), and marked
rate-limiting/sitemap/noindex as deferred.
No code changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Paul <justin@jpaul.me>
Implements non-negotiable #1: the AI assistant never writes autonomously. Every
assistant/contributor "write" emits a ChangeProposal — a structured diff a human
approves, edits, or rejects. Design: docs/design/change-proposal.md.
Structural guarantee: a proposal's operations reach the DB ONLY via
change_proposal_service.apply(), which requires the actor be an editor and
dispatches each op through the normal editing services (person/name/event/
relationship/source/citation create/update/delete) — so every change passes the
privacy engine and is audited as the approving human. propose() only inserts a
pending row; it performs no domain mutation. Model providers stay read-only, so
no model response can mutate tree data.
- ChangeProposal model + migration (status pending|applied|rejected, origin
assistant|contributor, JSONB operations, reviewer + apply_error).
- Service: propose / list / get / apply (with optional edited ops) / reject /
delete; a dispatcher mapping ops → editing services. v1 applies ops in order,
not cross-op transactional (single-op is atomic; documented).
- API /trees/{id}/proposals + a frontend review page (approve/reject; editor-
gated) and sidebar entry.
Tests: proposal doesn't apply until approved; reject doesn't apply; non-editor
member can see but not apply; multi-op; approve-with-edits; apply-error keeps it
pending. Full suite 87 passed; single alembic head.
Closes#214
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Paul <justin@jpaul.me>
justin