Add 4 independent seed brands: Latham + Stine + 1st Choice + Burrus (+623 varieties) (#17)
Image rebuild (skip scrape) / build (push) Successful in 4m44s

Co-authored-by: claude <claude@jpaul.io>
Co-committed-by: claude <claude@jpaul.io>
This commit was merged in pull request #17.
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-04 21:58:07 -04:00
committed by Claude (agent)
parent 22e8092faf
commit 84ad2b1de6
1254 changed files with 103589 additions and 4 deletions
+33
View File
@@ -102,6 +102,39 @@ rows). *Soil Adaptability* uses `HR` (highly recommended) / `R`
all three. Ebbert's-style independent brand, but ratings ARE parsed
into structured groups so they're retrievable.
**Latham Hi-Tech Seeds**: numeric ratings `~1-9 where LOWER = BETTER`
(1 = best / most tolerant / most resistant) — **REVERSED from Bayer,
same direction as NK / AgriPro**. There's no on-page legend; the
direction was derived empirically (top-rated stalks/roots cluster at
1.01.5, weak traits at 3.03.5). Categorical values pass through
verbatim: SCN source (`PI 88788`), Phytophthora gene (`Rps 1k`),
Anthracnose (`ASR`). `NA`/blank = not rated.
**Stine Seed**: **corn** is `1-9 numeric, 9 = Excellent / best`
(HIGHER = better, same as Bayer — read from the on-page legend:
9 Excellent … 5 Below Average). **Soybeans are QUALITATIVE** (vigor
Excellent/Very Good/Good; disease Resistant/Strong/Good/Susceptible
where Resistant/Strong = best), with SCN source + RPS gene passed
through, not a number. So a Stine corn "8" is strong but a Latham
"8" is weak — never compare the raw numbers across these two.
**Burrus Seed**: numeric ratings `1-10, 10 = best / most tolerant`
(HIGHER = better; observed range 410). Herbicide tolerances and Bt
insect-protection are `Yes/No` (verbatim). `NR`/blank/`0`/`-` = not
rated. Covers brands Burrus / Power Plus / DONMARIO.
**1st Choice Seeds**: `0-10, HIGHER = better` (0-4 Below Average,
5 Average, 6 Good, 7 Very Good, 8 Excellent, 9-10 Superior). Many
older corn hybrids publish only partial ratings (source gap); wheat
is identity-only.
**⚠️ Direction is NOT consistent across the independents.** HIGHER =
better: Bayer, Golden Harvest, Stine(corn), ProHarvest(disease),
Burrus(1-10), 1st Choice(0-10). LOWER = better (1 = best): NK,
AgriPro, **Latham**. Qualitative (no direction): Stine(soy),
ProHarvest(general/agronomic), AgriPro(agronomic), Ebbert's. A raw
numeric rating is meaningless without its `_scale_direction`.
**Always check the chunk's "Rating scale" line or call
`lookup_variety(source_key)` and look at `_scale_direction` if you
are unsure.** Cross-vendor comparisons are valid AFTER you've