Files
seed-mcp/corpus/gh_plot_reports/ghpr-soybeans-pa-2024-2426687.md
T
justin 0e625553e5 gh_plot_reports corpus (4,299 plots) + concurrency + 4-GPU pool
CORPUS — 4,299 GH plot reports added (3,797 written + 502 from the
earlier slow run + 319 sitemap-listed URLs that 404'd as
discontinued). Combined with prior 760 varieties + 14 AgriPro
trials = 5,073 total chunks now indexed.

scrape/sources/gh_plot_reports.py — concurrency speedup:
- 4 worker threads (ThreadPoolExecutor), each with its own
  requests.Session for connection-pool efficiency.
- Shared class-level rate limiter (0.25 sec between ANY two
  requests across all threads). Net throughput ~4 req/sec —
  well below any rate-limit threshold a public site enforces.
- Diagnosis vs original 1 req/sec: GH had ZERO rate limiting,
  zero 429s, zero retries. The 1 sec self-throttle was just too
  conservative. Bench:
    1 worker  / 1.0 sec throttle:  ~0.4 plots/sec (190 min ETA)
    4 workers / 0.25 sec throttle: ~3 plots/sec  (~25 min actual)

rag/chunk.py — chunk size cap for nomic-embed-text's 2048-token
context window:
- Empirically tested: failure threshold is ~5,250 chars on
  numeric-heavy trial chunks (chars/token ratio 2.4 vs 3.5 for
  prose). Cap at 4,500 chars to be safely under at worst-case
  2.2 chars/token.
- Applied to BOTH variety and trial chunks. Marked truncated
  chunks with metadata.embed_truncated = True; FULL text stays
  in the on-disk .md for get_page to return verbatim.

.gitea/workflows/{refresh,image-only}.yml — OLLAMA_URL pool
restructured for the 4 GPU-pinned endpoints. Bench (50-chunk
batches on nomic-embed-text):

    .0.125:11434  (RTX 40-series)  242 embeds/sec  ← weight ×4
    .0.2:11436    (GPU-pinned)     108 embeds/sec  ← weight ×2
    .0.2:11435    (GPU-pinned)      72 embeds/sec  ← weight ×1
    localhost     (TITAN X)         37 embeds/sec  ← weight ×1

Weighting is done by listing the URL multiple times in
OLLAMA_URL since the embedder uses round-robin. .0.2:11434 is
explicitly EXCLUDED — it isn't pinned to a specific GPU.

Combined index rebuild for 5,073 chunks now finishes in ~3 min
(was 19+ on the single-endpoint pool).

Smoke tests:
✓ list_versions: 5,073 docs across 6 sources, 2 vendors, 6
  brands, 4 crops (corn 2711, soy 2016, silage 223, wheat 123).
✓ search_trials({crop=corn, state=IA, year=2024}): 3 IA 2024
  corn trials surfaced.
✓ search_trials("Phytophthora resistance soybean trial"): NK
  NK43-W1XFS top-1 in LA 2024 trial (cross-vendor result).
✓ search_trials("AP Iliad Idaho wheat"): AgriPro Washington/N
  Idaho 2025 trial surfaced.
✓ search_trials(product=DKC65-95): 3 corn trials containing
  that hybrid in IL/IA 2024.
✓ search_trials(product=NK1701): 3 corn trials in AR/MS 2024.
✓ Product filter correctly returns EMPTY for products that
  aren't in the corpus (DKC65-20 is a 2023 product; 2023 plots
  deferred). Anti-hallucination contract preserved.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 16:46:35 -04:00

1.7 KiB

Soybean yield trial — Pennsylvania, 2024


Results (top-down by rank)

Rank Brand Product Traits Yield %MST Test Weight Gross Revenue
1 Xitavo XO 3555E 78.5 11.1 57.4 $824.25
2 Asgrow AG35XF5 - 71.1 13.1 56.1 $746.55
3 Asgrow AG36XF4 - 70.7 12.4 56.2 $742.35
4 Asgrow AG26XF4 - 69.3 13.5 55.1 $727.65
5 NK NK36-H9E3S Enlist E3 ® STS ® 68.3 13.0 56.0 $717.15
6 Asgrow AG27XF3 - 67.7 13.3 55.5 $710.85
7 Asgrow AG33XF3 - 67.5 12.8 55.7 $708.75
8 Xitavo XO 3655E 67.1 12.2 57.2 $704.55
9 Asgrow AG30XF4 - 65.2 12.9 56.3 $684.60
10 NK NK27-J5E3 Enlist E3 ® 64.9 14.1 56.0 $681.45
10 Xitavo XO 3483E 64.9 11.7 56.4 $681.45
12 Asgrow AG37XF5 - 64.2 12.4 56.5 $674.10
13 Asgrow AG29XF5 - 61.9 13.3 55.1 $649.95
14 Xitavo XO 3105E 61.0 12.0 55.7 $640.50
15 Xitavo XO 3014E 60.7 12.7 55.7 $637.35
16 Xitavo XO 3224E 57.7 12.1 55.9 $605.85
17 Xitavo XO 2865E 57.5 12.9 56.8 $603.75

Top 5 by Yield: XO (Xitavo) 78.5, AG35XF5 (Asgrow) 71.1, AG36XF4 (Asgrow) 70.7, AG26XF4 (Asgrow) 69.3, NK36-H9E3S (NK) 68.3.