a97107de46
Image rebuild (skip scrape) / build (push) Failing after 1h37m12s
Dockerfile: self-contained image with corpus + Chroma + BM25 baked in. Drawbar's compose pulls + runs without volume mounts. Built from sources.json (labels schema), PRODUCT_NAME=crop_chem by default, HYBRID_SEARCH=true (always-on for production quality). RERANK_URL + OLLAMA_URL get set at compose time. .gitea/workflows/refresh.yml: monthly cron (1st @ 06:00 UTC) does full scrape → reindex → image push. Scrapes Bayer (~30 min) + EPA PPLS row-crop filtered (~7h). Skips reindex+push if no corpus diff. Tags pushed: :latest, :<sha12>, :corpus-<YYYY.MM.DD>. .gitea/workflows/image-only.yml: on-demand or auto on code-only pushes to main (paths: docs_mcp/, rag/, scrape/, requirements.txt, Dockerfile, sources.json). Reindexes from committed corpus, builds image, pushes. ~10 min vs ~9h full refresh. .gitignore: corpus/ now COMMITTED (4,159 labels, 265 MB of .md + sidecars). Lets image-only.yml rebuild indexes without re-scraping. chroma/ + bm25/ still gitignored (regenerable binary indexes). .dockerignore: drops venv, eval results, PLAN/README/CLAUDE.md, deploy/, .git/ — keeps the image lean. corpus + chroma + bm25 explicitly NOT in dockerignore (those go INTO the image). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1288 lines
74 KiB
Markdown
1288 lines
74 KiB
Markdown
# MON 89034 X TC1507 X MON 87411 X DAS-59122-7 SEED BLEND
|
||
|
||
- EPA Reg No: **524-631**
|
||
- Registrant: BAYER CROPSCIENCE, LLC
|
||
- Signal word: Caution
|
||
- Active ingredients: Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1F protein and the genetic material necessary for its production (plasmid insert PHI8999) in corn (0.00096%); Bacillus thuringiensis Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 proteins and the genetic material necessary for their production in corn (0.012%); Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A.105 protein and genetic material necessary (vector PV-ZMIR245) for its production in corn (0.0088%); Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ab2 protein and the genetic material necessary (vector PV-ZMIR245) for its production in corn (0.0048%); dsRNA transcript comprising a DvSnf7 inverted repeat sequence derived from western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera) and the genetic material necessary for its production MON 87411 corn (4.4e-07%); Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb1 protein and the genetic material necessary for its procuction (vector PV -ZMIR10871) in corn event MON 87411 (0.0041%)
|
||
- Label accepted: 2022-06-14
|
||
- Source PDF: https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/000524-00631-20220614.pdf
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
EPA Form 8570-6
|
||
|
||
|
||
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
|
||
Office of Pesticide Programs
|
||
Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511M)
|
||
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
|
||
Washington, D.C. 20460
|
||
|
||
EPA Reg. Number:
|
||
|
||
524-631
|
||
|
||
Date of Issuance:
|
||
|
||
6/14/2022
|
||
NOTICE OF PESTICIDE:
|
||
☒Registration
|
||
☐Reregistration
|
||
|
||
Term of Issuance:
|
||
Unconditional
|
||
(under FIFRA, as amended)
|
||
Name of Pesticide Product:
|
||
MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411
|
||
x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
|
||
Name and Address of Registrant (include ZIP Code):
|
||
Bayer CropScience LP
|
||
700 Chesterfield Parkway West
|
||
Chesterfield, Missouri 63017
|
||
|
||
|
||
Note: Changes in labeling differing in substance from that accepted in connection with this registration must be submitted to and accepted by the Biopesticides
|
||
and Pollution Prevention Division prior to use of the label in commerce. In any correspondence on this product, always refer to the above EPA Registration
|
||
Number.
|
||
|
||
On the basis of information furnished by the registrant, the above-named pesticide is hereby registered
|
||
under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA or the Act).
|
||
|
||
Registration is in no way to be construed as an endorsement or recommendation of this product by the
|
||
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In order to protect health and the environment, the
|
||
Administrator, on his or her motion, may at any time suspend or cancel the registration of a pesticide in
|
||
accordance with the Act. The acceptance of any name in connection with the registration of a product
|
||
under the Act is not to be construed as giving the registrant a right to exclusive use of the name or to its
|
||
use if it has been covered by others.
|
||
|
||
This product is unconditionally registered in accordance with FIFRA section 3(c)(5) provided that you
|
||
comply with the following terms:
|
||
|
||
1. The subject registration will automatically expire at midnight on June 30, 2023.
|
||
Signature of Approving Official:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Alan Reynolds, Team Leader
|
||
Emerging Technologies Branch
|
||
Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P)
|
||
|
||
Date:
|
||
|
||
|
||
6/14/2022
|
||
|
||
Page 2 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
2. The subject registration will be limited to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 proteins and
|
||
the genetic material necessary for their production (vector PV-ZMIR245) in MON 89034 corn (OECD
|
||
Unique Identifier: MON-89Ø34-3), Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1F protein and the genetic material
|
||
necessary for its production (vector PHP8999) in TC1507 corn (OECD Unique Identifier: DAS-Ø15Ø7-
|
||
1), Bacillus thuringiensis Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1 proteins and the genetic material necessary for their
|
||
production (vector PHP17662) in DAS-59122-7 corn (OECD Unique Identifier: DAS-59122-7), DvSnf7
|
||
dsRNA [Double-stranded ribonucleic acid transcript comprising a DvSnf7 inverted repeat sequence
|
||
derived from western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera)], Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb1
|
||
protein and the genetic material necessary for their production (vector PV-ZMIR10871) in MON 87411
|
||
corn (OECD Unique Identifier: MON-87411-9), and a minimum of 5% non-PIP corn seed for use in
|
||
field corn.
|
||
|
||
3. Submit/cite all data required for registration of your product under FIFRA section 3(c)(5) when the
|
||
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires registrants of similar products to submit such data.
|
||
|
||
4. This plant-incorporated protectant (PIP) may be combined through conventional breeding with other
|
||
registered plant-incorporated protectants that are similarly approved for use in combination, through
|
||
conventional breeding, with other registered plant-incorporated protectants to produce inbred corn lines
|
||
and hybrid corn varieties with combined pesticidal traits.
|
||
|
||
5. Bayer CropScience LP (Bayer) must commit to do the following Insect Resistance Management (IRM)
|
||
Program, consisting of the following elements:
|
||
|
||
Requirements for Bayer to implement an IPM-based stewardship program designed to reduce
|
||
selection pressure for corn rootworm (CRW) resistance.
|
||
|
||
Requirements relating to a refuge assurance program for ensuring the correct refuge blend
|
||
percentage.
|
||
|
||
Requirements relating to creation of a lepidopteran refuge (consisting of corn that does not
|
||
contain any Bt trait for lepidopteran control) in cotton growing regions in conjunction with the
|
||
planting of MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn;
|
||
|
||
Requirements for Bayer to prepare and require MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-
|
||
59122-7 Seed Blend corn users to sign grower agreements that impose binding contractual
|
||
obligations on growers to comply with the refuge requirements.
|
||
|
||
Requirements for Bayer to develop, implement, and report to EPA on programs to educate
|
||
growers about IRM requirements.
|
||
|
||
Requirements for Bayer to develop, implement, and report to EPA on programs to evaluate
|
||
and promote growers’ compliance with IRM requirements.
|
||
|
||
Requirements for Bayer to develop, implement, and report to EPA on monitoring programs to
|
||
evaluate whether there are statistically significant and biologically relevant changes in
|
||
susceptibility to the Cry1A.105, Cry2Ab2, and Cry1F proteins in the target insects.
|
||
|
||
Requirements for Bayer to develop, and if triggered, to implement a remedial action plan that
|
||
would contain measures Bayer would take in the event that any field-relevant insect resistance to
|
||
|
||
Page 3 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
Cry1A.105, Cry2Ab2, and Cry1F was detected, as well as to report on activity under the plan to
|
||
EPA.
|
||
|
||
Requirements for Bayer to investigate reports of unexpected CRW damage to MON 89034 x
|
||
TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn from growers (“performance
|
||
inquiries”) and sample CRW to determine if the insects are resistant to Cry34/35Ab1, DvSnf7
|
||
dsRNA, or Cry3Bb1.
|
||
|
||
Requirements for Bayer to recommend CRW management options to growers in response to
|
||
cases of unexpected CRW damage to MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7
|
||
Seed Blend corn.
|
||
|
||
Requirements regarding mitigation and notification actions that Bayer would take in the event
|
||
that CRW resistance was detected.
|
||
|
||
Requirements for Bayer to maintain, and provide the Agency upon request, the number of units
|
||
sold by state and county, IRM grower agreement results, and substantive changes to educational
|
||
programs. Bayer is required to submit reports within three months of the Agency’s request.
|
||
|
||
Bag Tag Requirements for MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
corn. Seed bags and/or bag tags for corn hybrids that contain plant- incorporated protectants
|
||
produced in MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn must display
|
||
the registration number and active ingredients, and stipulate that growers read the Bayer
|
||
Stewardship Guide (or equivalent guidance) prior to planting these hybrids. The refuge size
|
||
requirement must be displayed on the bag or bag tag in both text and graphic format.
|
||
|
||
Requirements for Bayer to submit reports on CRW IPM Stewardship and resistance monitoring
|
||
within the time frames specified in this letter.
|
||
|
||
a. Integrated Pest Management Stewardship Program
|
||
|
||
1. Bayer must implement an IPM-based stewardship program for MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x
|
||
DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn. This program must be designed to reduce selection pressure for corn
|
||
rootworm (CRW) resistance by encouraging growers to engage in a multi-year crop rotation strategy
|
||
involving the use of one or more of the following: a non-CRW host crop (e.g., soybean), pyramided Bt
|
||
corn Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs), other PIP corn products with different modes of action,
|
||
and/or non-PIP or non-CRW protected Bt corn. As part of the stewardship program, Bayer must update
|
||
the technology use guide/grower guide and other grower educational materials to indicate that
|
||
application of an insecticide to the soil surface, in furrows, and/or incorporated into the soil (referred to
|
||
as “soil applied insecticide”, “soil insecticide” or “SAI”) with MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x
|
||
DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn is not recommended for control of CRW except under limited
|
||
circumstances and in consultation with extension, crop consultants or other local experts. Grower
|
||
education materials should also state that SAIs should not be necessary for CRW control with
|
||
pyramided CRW trait Bt corn product(s). As part of the stewardship program, Bayer must promote the
|
||
ABSTC/NCGA Best Management Practices (BMPs) for CRW control. Implementation of the IPM
|
||
strategy can include:
|
||
|
||
Grower education initiatives or incentives;
|
||
Outreach to extension and consultant groups.
|
||
|
||
Page 4 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
|
||
2. Bayer must submit an annual report to EPA documenting activities conducted under the IPM
|
||
stewardship program. This report must include an anonymous survey of grower practices, including
|
||
adoption levels of the various crop rotation options (if employed) and other elements of the stewardship
|
||
program. Bayer may combine this product with other registered products to submit one annual report.
|
||
The report must be submitted by January 31st each year.
|
||
|
||
b. Refuge Requirements for MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
|
||
The following information must be included on the product bag or bag-tag as sold per respective region and
|
||
in the Grower Guide:
|
||
|
||
Corn-Belt/Non-Cotton Growing Areas
|
||
|
||
MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn contains a Lepidopteran and corn
|
||
rootworm refuge that is “in the bag” and is automatically implemented when the grower plants the product.
|
||
No additional refuge is required when planting this product.
|
||
|
||
Foliar insecticide treatments for control of European corn borer, corn earworm, southwestern corn borer, fall
|
||
armyworm, black cutworm, western bean cutworm, lesser corn stalk borer, southern corn stalk borer, stalk
|
||
borer, and sugarcane borer may be applied only if economic thresholds are reached for one or more of these
|
||
target pests. Foliar insecticide treatments are also permitted for control of corn rootworm adults if economic
|
||
thresholds are reached. Economic thresholds will be determined using methods recommended by local or
|
||
regional professionals (e.g., Extension Service Agents, crop consultants).
|
||
|
||
Cotton-Growing Region Refuge Requirements
|
||
|
||
These refuge requirements do not apply to planting of inbred/hybrid corn seed productions, breeding, and
|
||
small-scale research trials on up to a total of 20,000 acres per county and up to a combined United States
|
||
(U.S.) total of 250,000 acres per plant-incorporated protectant (PIP) active ingredient per registrant per year.
|
||
Grower agreements (also known as stewardship agreements) will specify that growers must adhere to the
|
||
refuge requirements as described in the grower guide/product use guide and/or in supplements to the grower
|
||
guide/product use guide.
|
||
|
||
In cotton-growing regions where corn earworm is a significant pest:
|
||
|
||
The 20% refuge must be planted with non-PIP hybrids.
|
||
|
||
MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend and the 20% non-PIP refuge should
|
||
be sown on the same day, or with the shortest window possible between planting dates.
|
||
|
||
External refuges may be planted as an in-field or adjacent (e.g., across the road) refuge or as a separate
|
||
block within 1/2 mile of the MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn
|
||
field.
|
||
|
||
In field refuge options include blocks, perimeter strips (i.e., along the edges or headlands), or infield
|
||
strips.
|
||
|
||
When planting the refuge in strips across the field, refuges must be at least four (4) rows wide.
|
||
|
||
Page 5 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
|
||
Foliar insecticide treatments for control of European corn borer, corn earworm, southwestern corn borer,
|
||
fall armyworm, black cutworm, western bean cutworm, lesser corn stalk borer, southern corn stalk
|
||
borer, stalk borer and sugarcane borer may be applied only if economic thresholds are reached for one or
|
||
more of these target pests. Economic thresholds will be determined using methods recommended by
|
||
local or regional professionals (e.g., Extension Service agents, crop consultants). Microbial Bt
|
||
insecticides must not be applied to non-PIP corn refuge plants.
|
||
|
||
Cotton-growing areas include the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana,
|
||
North Carolina, Mississippi, South Carolina, Oklahoma (only the counties of Beckham, Caddo,
|
||
Comanche, Custer, Greer, Harmon, Jackson, Kay, Kiowa, Tillman, and Washita), Tennessee (only the
|
||
counties of Carroll, Chester, Crockett, Dyer, Fayette, Franklin, Gibson, Hardeman, Hardin, Haywood,
|
||
Lake, Lauderdale, Lincoln, Madison, Obion, Rutherford, Shelby, and Tipton), Texas (except the
|
||
counties of Carson, Dallam, Hansford, Hartley, Hutchinson, Lipscomb, Moore, Ochiltree, Roberts, and
|
||
Sherman), Virginia (only the counties of Dinwiddie, Franklin City, Greensville, Isle of Wight,
|
||
Northampton, Southampton, Suffolk City, Surrey, and Sussex) and Missouri (only the counties of
|
||
Dunklin, New Madrid, Pemiscot, Scott, and Stoddard).
|
||
|
||
c. Grower Agreements for MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
|
||
1. Persons purchasing MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn must sign
|
||
a grower agreement. The term grower agreement refers to any grower purchase contract, license
|
||
agreement, or similar legal document.
|
||
|
||
2. The grower agreement and/or specific stewardship documents referenced in the grower agreement must
|
||
clearly set forth the terms of the current IRM program. By signing the grower agreement, a grower
|
||
must be contractually bound to comply with the requirements of the IRM program.
|
||
|
||
3. Bayer must continue to integrate this registration into the current system used for its other Bt corn
|
||
plant- incorporated protectants, which is reasonably likely to assure that persons purchasing MON
|
||
89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn will affirm annually that they are
|
||
contractually bound to comply with the requirements of the IRM program.
|
||
|
||
4. Bayer must continue to use its current grower agreement for MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x
|
||
DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn. If Bayer wishes to change any part of the grower agreement or any
|
||
specific stewardship documents referenced in the grower agreement that would affect either the content
|
||
of the IRM program or the legal enforceability of the provisions of the agreement relating to the IRM
|
||
program, then thirty (30) days prior to implementing a proposed change, Bayer must submit to EPA the
|
||
text of such changes to ensure that it is consistent with the terms and conditions of this amended
|
||
registration.
|
||
|
||
5. Bayer shall maintain records of all MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
corn grower agreements for a period of three (3) years from December 31st of the year in which the
|
||
agreement was signed.
|
||
|
||
6. Bayer shall make available to the Agency upon request records of the number of units of MON 89034 x
|
||
TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn seed sold or shipped and not returned, and the
|
||
number of such units that were sold to persons who have signed grower agreements for the previous
|
||
growing season. Bayer is required to submit reports within three months of the Agency’s request.
|
||
|
||
Page 6 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
7. Bayer must allow a review of the grower agreements and grower agreement records by EPA or by a
|
||
State pesticide regulatory agency if the State agency can demonstrate that confidential business
|
||
information, including names, personal information, and grower license numbers of the growers, will
|
||
be protected.
|
||
|
||
d. IRM Education and IRM Compliance Monitoring Program for MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411
|
||
x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend in EPA-designated Cotton Counties
|
||
|
||
1. Bayer must implement and enhance (as set forth in paragraph 17 of this section) a comprehensive,
|
||
ongoing IRM education program designed to convey to MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-
|
||
59122-7 Seed Blend corn users the importance of complying with the IRM program, as well as seed
|
||
blend product performance expectations and guidance to growers on actions to take when unexpected
|
||
damage occurs. The program shall include information encouraging MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON
|
||
87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn users to pursue optional elements of the IRM program relating
|
||
to refuge configuration and proximity to MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed
|
||
Blend corn fields. The education program shall involve the use of multiple media, e.g. face-to-face
|
||
meetings, mailing written materials, EPA-reviewed language on IRM requirements on the bag or bag
|
||
tag, and electronic communications such as by internet, radio, or television commercials. The program
|
||
shall involve at least one written communication annually to each MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON
|
||
87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn user separate from the grower technical guide. The
|
||
communication shall inform the user of the current IRM requirements and specifically the need to plant
|
||
a lepidopteran refuge in cotton growing regions. Bayer shall coordinate its education program with the
|
||
educational efforts of other registrants and other organizations, such as the National Corn Growers
|
||
Association and state extension programs.
|
||
|
||
2. Bayer shall revise, and expand as necessary, its education program to take into account the information
|
||
collected through the compliance survey, required under paragraphs 6–9 of this section, and from other
|
||
sources. The changes shall address aspects of grower compliance that are not sufficiently high.
|
||
|
||
3. Upon EPA request, Bayer shall provide copies of grower education materials and information on
|
||
grower education activities including any substantive changes to these materials and activities
|
||
conducted either individually or as part of the industry working group Agricultural Biotechnology
|
||
Stewardship Technical Committee (ABSTC). Bayer is required to submit reports within three months
|
||
of the Agency’s request. The required features of the compliance assurance program are described in
|
||
paragraphs 4–22 of this section.
|
||
|
||
4. Bayer must implement and improve an ongoing IRM compliance assurance program designed to
|
||
evaluate the extent to which growers purchasing MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-
|
||
7 Seed Blend corn are compliant with the requirement of a 20% refuge for lepidopteran pests in cotton
|
||
growing areas, and that takes such actions as are reasonably needed to assure that growers who have
|
||
not complied with the program either do so in the future or lose their access to Bayer’s Bt corn
|
||
products. Bayer shall coordinate with other Bt corn registrants in improving its compliance assurance
|
||
program and integrate this registration into the current compliance assurance program used for its other
|
||
Bt corn plant-incorporated protectants. Other required features of the program are described in
|
||
paragraphs 5–22 of this section.
|
||
|
||
5. Bayer must maintain and publicize a phased compliance approach (i.e., a guidance document that
|
||
indicates how it will address instances of non-compliance with the terms of the IRM program and
|
||
general criteria for choosing among options for responding to any non-compliant growers after the first
|
||
year of non-compliance). While recognizing that for reasons of difference in business practices there
|
||
|
||
Page 7 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
are needs for flexibility between different companies, Bayer must use a consistent set of standards for
|
||
responding to non-compliance. A grower found with a second incident of significant non-compliance
|
||
with refuge requirements for the Bt corn product within a five-year period will be denied access the
|
||
next year to Bayer’s Bt corn products. Similarly, seed dealers who are not fulfilling their obligations to
|
||
inform/educate growers of their IRM obligations will lose their opportunity to sell Bt corn.
|
||
|
||
6. The IRM compliance assurance program shall include an annual survey, conducted by an independent
|
||
third-party, of a statistically representative sample of growers MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x
|
||
DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn. The survey shall be conducted in odd-numbered years beginning in
|
||
2023 and shall include growers who plant 100 or more acres of corn in the Southern U.S. corn-cotton
|
||
areas. Bayer may collaborate with other registrants of Bt corn [for example, through the industry
|
||
working group the Agricultural Biotechnology Stewardship Technical Committee (ABSTC)] to
|
||
conduct the survey.
|
||
|
||
In the U.S. Corn Belt, no anonymous grower survey is required for MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON
|
||
87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn if Bayer can demonstrate that the industry-wide adoption of
|
||
integrated refuge products (i.e., refuge seed blends) is equal to or greater than 70% of Bt corn acres in
|
||
the Corn Belt. If industry- wide adoption of integrated refuge products (i.e., refuge seed blends) falls
|
||
below 70% of Bt corn acres in the Corn Belt, an anonymous grower survey shall also be conducted in
|
||
this region during the next growing season using a statistically representative sample of growers who
|
||
plant 200 or more acres of corn, and grower surveys shall be continued every odd-numbered year until
|
||
the industry-wide adoption of integrated refuge products (i.e., refuge seed blends) is again equal to or
|
||
greater than 70% of Bt corn acres in this region. Bayer may collaborate with other registrants of Bt corn
|
||
(for example, through the industry working group the ABSTC) to compile the integrated refuge
|
||
adoption data and to conduct the surveys.
|
||
|
||
Alternatively, if Bayer is not a participant of an industry working group (e.g., the ABSTC) and Bayer’s
|
||
sales of integrated refuge products are equal to or greater than 70% of Bayer’s total Bt corn sales in the
|
||
prior year, then no anonymous grower survey is required in the U.S. Corn Belt. If Bayer’s sales of
|
||
integrated refuge products fall below 70% of Bayer’s total Bt corn sales, an anonymous grower survey
|
||
shall also be conducted in this region during the next growing season using a statistically representative
|
||
sample of growers who plant 200 or more acres of corn, and grower surveys shall be continued every
|
||
odd-numbered year until sales of integrated refuge products (i.e., refuge seed blends) are again equal to
|
||
or greater than 70% of Bayer’s total
|
||
Bt corn sales in this region.
|
||
|
||
A third-party is classified as a party other than the registrant, the grower, or anyone else with a
|
||
direct interest in IRM compliance for Bt corn.
|
||
|
||
7. The survey shall be designed to provide an understanding of any difficulties growers encounter in
|
||
implementing IRM requirements. An analysis of survey results must include the reasons, extent, and
|
||
potential biological significance of any implementation deviations.
|
||
|
||
8. The survey shall be designed to obtain grower feedback on the usefulness of specific educational tools
|
||
and initiatives.
|
||
|
||
9. In years in which the survey is conducted, Bayer shall provide a final written summary of the results of
|
||
the survey (together with a description of the regions, the methodology used, and the supporting data)
|
||
to EPA on or before January 31st of the following year. Bayer shall confer with other registrants and
|
||
EPA on the design and content of the survey prior to its implementation.
|
||
|
||
Page 8 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
10. Bayer shall revise, and expand as necessary, its compliance assurance program to take into account the
|
||
information collected through the compliance survey, required under paragraphs 6–9 of this section,
|
||
and from other sources. The changes shall address aspects of grower compliance that are not
|
||
sufficiently high. Bayer must confer with EPA prior to adopting any changes.
|
||
|
||
11. Bayer shall conduct and enhance an annual on-farm assessment program. Bayer shall train its
|
||
representatives who make on-farm visits with MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7
|
||
Seed Blend corn growers to perform assessments of compliance with IRM requirements. There is no
|
||
minimum corn acreage size for this program. Therefore, growers will be selected for this program from
|
||
across all farm sizes. In the event that any of these visits result in the identification of a grower who is
|
||
not in compliance with the IRM program, Bayer shall take appropriate action, consistent with its
|
||
phased compliance approach, to promote compliance.
|
||
|
||
12. Bayer shall implement a program for investigating legitimate tips and complaints that MON 89034 x
|
||
TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn growers are not in compliance with the IRM
|
||
program. Whenever an investigation results in the identification of a grower who is not in compliance
|
||
with the IRM program, Bayer shall take appropriate action, consistent with its phased compliance
|
||
approach.
|
||
|
||
13. If a grower, who purchases MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn for
|
||
planting, was specifically identified as not being in compliance during the previous year, Bayer shall
|
||
visit with the grower and evaluate whether the grower is in compliance with the IRM program for the
|
||
current year.
|
||
|
||
14. Annually, by January 31st each year, Bayer must provide a report to EPA summarizing the MON
|
||
89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend compliance assurance program activities
|
||
and results for the prior year and plans for the MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7
|
||
Seed Blend compliance assurance program for the current year. Within one month of submitting this
|
||
report to EPA, the registrant shall meet with EPA to discuss its findings. The report must inform EPA
|
||
of the number of growers deemed ineligible to purchase Bt corn seed on the basis of continued non-
|
||
compliance with the insect resistance management refuge requirements. Bayer may elect to coordinate
|
||
information with other registrants and report collectively the results of compliance assurance programs.
|
||
|
||
15. Bayer and the seed corn dealers for Bayer must allow a review of the compliance records by EPA or by
|
||
a State pesticide regulatory agency if the State agency can demonstrate that confidential business
|
||
information, including the names, personal information, and grower license numbers of the growers,
|
||
will be protected.
|
||
|
||
16. Bayer shall revise and expand its existing Compliance Assurance Program to include the following
|
||
elements. The registrant may coordinate with other registrants in designing and implementing its
|
||
Compliance Assurance Program.
|
||
|
||
17. Bayer will enhance the refuge education program throughout the seed delivery channel:
|
||
|
||
Ensure sales representatives, licensees, seed dealers, and growers recognize the importance of
|
||
correct refuge implementation and potential consequences of failure to plant the required refuge.
|
||
|
||
Implement a “bag tag” that will be attached to all bags of MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411
|
||
x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend seed sold and delivered. The purpose of this bag tag is to remind
|
||
growers that MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS- 59122-7 Seed Blend products
|
||
|
||
Page 9 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
require a separate 20% lepidopteran refuge in cotton growing areas. The PIP product label
|
||
accepted by EPA must include how this information will be conveyed to growers via text and
|
||
graphics.
|
||
|
||
18. Bayer will focus the majority of on-farm assessments on regions with the greatest risks for resistance:
|
||
|
||
Use Bt corn adoption, pest pressure information, and other available information to identify
|
||
regions where the risk of resistance is greatest;
|
||
|
||
Focus approximately two-thirds of on-farm assessments on these regions, with the remaining
|
||
assessments conducted across other regions where MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x
|
||
DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend is used.
|
||
|
||
19. Bayer will use its available MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend sales
|
||
records and other information to refine grower lists for on-farm assessments of their compliance with
|
||
refuge requirements:
|
||
|
||
Identify for potential on-farm assessment growers whose sales information indicates they have
|
||
purchased MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn product but
|
||
may have purchased little or no refuge seed from the registrant, licensee, or affiliated company.
|
||
|
||
20. Bayer will contract with third parties to perform on-farm assessments of compliance with refuge
|
||
requirements:
|
||
|
||
The third-party assessors will conduct all first-time on-farm assessments as well as second-year
|
||
on-farm assessments of those growers found out of compliance in a first- time assessment.
|
||
|
||
21. Bayer will annually refine the on-farm assessment program for the MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON
|
||
87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn product to reflect the adoption rate and level of refuge
|
||
compliance for the product.
|
||
|
||
22. Bayer will follow up with growers who have been found significantly out of compliance under the on-
|
||
farm assessment program and are found to be back in compliance the following year:
|
||
|
||
All growers found to be significantly out of compliance in a prior year will annually be sent
|
||
additional refuge assistance information for a minimum of two years by Bayer, seed supplier, or
|
||
third-party assessor, after completing the assessment process;
|
||
|
||
Bayer will conduct follow-up checks on growers found to be significantly out of compliance
|
||
within three years after they are found to be back in compliance;
|
||
|
||
A grower found with a second incident of significant non-compliance with refuge requirements
|
||
for the Bt corn product within a five-year period will be denied access to Bayer’s Bt corn
|
||
products the next year. Similarly, seed dealers who are not fulfilling their obligations to
|
||
inform/educate growers of their IRM obligations will lose their opportunity to sell Bt corn.
|
||
|
||
Page 10 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
e. Insect Resistance Monitoring and Mitigation Plan for MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-
|
||
59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
|
||
1. EPA is imposing the following conditions for the Cry1A.105, Cry2Ab2, and Cry1F toxins
|
||
expressed in MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
|
||
Bayer will monitor for resistance to Cry1A.105, Cry2Ab2, and Cry1F expressed in MON 89034 x
|
||
TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn. The monitoring program shall consist of
|
||
two approaches: (1) focused population sampling and laboratory testing; and (2) investigation of
|
||
reports of less-than expected control of labeled insects. Should field-relevant resistance be confirmed,
|
||
an appropriate resistance management action plan will be implemented.
|
||
|
||
Focused Population Sampling
|
||
|
||
Bayer shall annually sample and bioassay populations of the key target pests: Ostrinia nubilalis
|
||
(European corn borer; ECB), Diatraea grandiosella (southwestern corn borer; SWCB), and
|
||
Helicoverpa zea (corn earworm; CEW). Sampling for the target pests will be focused in areas
|
||
identified as those with the highest risk of resistance development (e.g., where lepidopteran active Bt
|
||
hybrids are planted on a high proportion of the corn acres, and where the insect species are regarded
|
||
as key pests of corn). Bioassay methods must be appropriate for the goal of detecting field-relevant
|
||
shifts in population response to MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
corn and/or changes in resistance allele frequency in response to the use of MON 89034 x TC1507 x
|
||
MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn and, as far as possible, should be consistent across
|
||
sampling years to enable comparisons with historical data.
|
||
|
||
The number of populations to be collected shall reflect the regional importance of the insect species
|
||
as a pest, and specific collection regions will be identified for each pest. For ECB, a minimum of
|
||
twelve (12) populations across the sampling region will be targeted for collection at each annual
|
||
sampling. For SWCB, the target will be a minimum of six (6) populations. For CEW, the target will
|
||
be a minimum of ten (10) populations. Pest populations should be collected from multiple corn-
|
||
growing states reflective of different geographies and agronomic conditions. To obtain sufficient
|
||
sensitivity to detect resistance alleles before they become common enough to cause measurable field
|
||
damage, each population collection shall attempt to target 400 insect genomes (egg masses, larvae,
|
||
mated females, and/or mixed-sex adults), but a successful population collection will contain a
|
||
minimum of 100 genomes. It is recognized that it may not be possible to collect the target number of
|
||
insect populations or genomes due to factors such as natural fluctuations in pest density,
|
||
environmental conditions, and area-wide pest suppression.
|
||
|
||
The sampling program and geographic range of collections may be modified as appropriate based on
|
||
changes in pest importance and for the adoption levels of MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x
|
||
DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn. EPA shall be consulted prior to the implementation of such
|
||
modifications.
|
||
|
||
Bayer will report to EPA, on or before January 31
|
||
st of each year, the results of the population
|
||
sampling and bioassay monitoring program.
|
||
|
||
Any incidence of unusually low sensitivity to the Cry1A.105, Cry2Ab2, and Cry1F proteins in
|
||
|
||
Page 11 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
bioassays shall be investigated as soon as possible to understand any field relevance of such a finding.
|
||
Such investigations shall proceed in a stepwise manner until the field relevance can be either
|
||
confirmed or refuted, and results of these shall be reported to EPA annually on or before January 31st.
|
||
The investigative steps will include the following:
|
||
|
||
i. Re-test progeny of the collected population to determine whether the unusual bioassay response
|
||
is reproducible and heritable. If it is not reproducible and heritable, no further action is required.
|
||
|
||
ii. If the unusual response is reproducible and heritable, progeny of insects that survive the
|
||
diagnostic concentration will be tested using methods that are representative of exposure to
|
||
MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn under field conditions.
|
||
If progeny do not survive to adulthood, any suspected resistance is not field relevant and no
|
||
further action is required.
|
||
|
||
iii. If insects survive steps 1 and 2, resistance is confirmed, and further steps will be taken to
|
||
evaluate the resistance. These steps may include the following:
|
||
|
||
a. Determining the nature of the resistance (i.e., recessive or dominant, and the level of
|
||
functional dominance);
|
||
|
||
b. Estimating the resistance allele frequency in the original population;
|
||
|
||
c. Determining whether the resistance allele frequency is increasing by analyzing field
|
||
collections in subsequent years sampled from the same site where the resistance allele(s)
|
||
was originally collected;
|
||
|
||
d. Determining the geographic distribution of the resistance allele by analyzing field
|
||
collections in subsequent years from sites surrounding the site where the resistance
|
||
allele(s) was originally collected.
|
||
|
||
Should field-relevant resistance be confirmed, and the resistance appears to be increasing or spreading,
|
||
Bayer will consult with EPA to develop and implement a case-specific resistance management action
|
||
plan.
|
||
|
||
Investigation of Reports of Unexpected Levels of Damage by the Target Pests
|
||
|
||
Bayer will follow up on grower, extension specialist, or consultant reports of unexpected levels of
|
||
damage by the lepidopteran pests listed on the pesticide label. Bayer will instruct its customers to
|
||
contact them if such incidents occur. Bayer will investigate all legitimate reports submitted to the
|
||
company or the company's representatives.
|
||
|
||
If reports of unexpected levels of damage lead to the suspicion of resistance in any of the key target
|
||
pests (ECB, SWCB, and CEW), Bayer will implement the actions described below, based on the
|
||
following definitions of suspected resistance and confirmed resistance.
|
||
|
||
Suspected Resistance
|
||
|
||
EPA defines suspected resistance to mean field reports of unexpected levels of insect-feeding
|
||
|
||
Page 12 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
damage for which:
|
||
|
||
The corn in question has been confirmed to be lepidopteran-active Bt corn;
|
||
|
||
The seed used had the proper percentage of corn expressing Bt protein;
|
||
|
||
The relevant plant tissues are expressing the expected level of Bt protein; and
|
||
|
||
It has been ruled out that species not susceptible to the protein could be responsible for the
|
||
damage, that no climatic or cultural reasons could be responsible for the damage, and
|
||
|
||
That there could be no other reasonable causes for the damage.
|
||
|
||
EPA does not interpret suspected resistance to mean grower reports of possible control failures or
|
||
suspicious results from annual insect monitoring assays, nor does EPA intend that extensive field
|
||
studies and testing be undertaken to confirm scientifically the presence of insects resistant to MON
|
||
89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn in commercial production fields
|
||
before responsive measures are undertaken.
|
||
|
||
If resistance is suspected, Bayer will instruct growers to do the following:
|
||
|
||
Use alternative control measures in MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7
|
||
Seed Blend corn fields in the affected region to control the target pest during the immediate
|
||
growing season.
|
||
|
||
Destroy MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn crop residues
|
||
in the affected region within one (1) month after harvest with a technique appropriate for local
|
||
production practices to minimize the possibility of resistant insects over- wintering and
|
||
contributing to the next season's target pest population.
|
||
|
||
Additionally, if possible, and prior to the application of alternative control measures or destruction
|
||
of crop residues, Bayer will collect samples of the insect population in the affected fields for
|
||
laboratory rearing and testing. Such rearing and testing shall be conducted as expeditiously as
|
||
practical.
|
||
|
||
Confirmed Resistance
|
||
|
||
EPA defines confirmed resistance to mean, in the case of field reports of unexpected levels of damage
|
||
from the key target pests, that all the following criteria are met:
|
||
|
||
There is >30% insect survival and commensurate insect feeding in a bioassay, initiated with
|
||
neonate larvae, that uses methods that are representative of exposure to Bt corn hybrids
|
||
under field conditions (ECB and SWCB only).
|
||
|
||
In standardized laboratory bioassays using diagnostic concentrations of the Bt protein suited to
|
||
the target pest in question, the pest exhibits resistance that has a genetic basis and the level of
|
||
survivorship indicates that there may be a resistance allele frequency of ≥ 0.1 in the sampled
|
||
population.
|
||
|
||
Page 13 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
In standardized laboratory bioassays, the LC50 exceeds the upper limit of the 95% confidence
|
||
interval of the LC50 for susceptible populations surveyed both in the original baselines
|
||
developed for this pest species and in previous years of field monitoring.
|
||
|
||
Response to Confirmed Resistance in a Key Target Pest as the Cause of Unexpected
|
||
Levels of Damage in the Field
|
||
|
||
When field resistance is confirmed (as defined above), the following steps will be taken by Bayer:
|
||
|
||
EPA will receive notification within 30 days of resistance confirmation;
|
||
|
||
Affected customers and extension agents will be notified about confirmed resistance within 30
|
||
days;
|
||
|
||
Monitoring will be increased in the affected area and local target pest populations will be
|
||
sampled annually to determine the extent and impact of resistance;
|
||
|
||
If appropriate (depending on the resistant pest species, the extent of resistance, the timing of
|
||
resistance, and the nature of resistance, and the availability of suitable alternative control
|
||
measures), alternative control measures will be employed to reduce or control target pest
|
||
populations in the affected area. Alternative control measures may include advising customers
|
||
and extension agents in the affected area to incorporate crop residues into the soil following
|
||
harvest to minimize the possibility of over-wintering insects, and/or applications of chemical
|
||
insecticides;
|
||
|
||
Unless otherwise agreed with EPA, stop sale and distribution of the relevant lepidopteran-
|
||
active Bt corn hybrids in the affected area immediately until an effective local mitigation plan,
|
||
approved by EPA, has been implemented;
|
||
|
||
Bayer will develop a case-specific resistance management action plan within 90 days
|
||
according to the characteristics of the resistance event and local agronomic needs. Bayer will
|
||
consult with appropriate stakeholders in the development of the action plan, and the details of
|
||
such a plan shall be approved by EPA prior to implementation;
|
||
|
||
Bayer will notify affected parties (e.g., growers, consultants, extension agents, seed
|
||
distributors, university cooperators, and state/federal authorities as appropriate) in the
|
||
region of the resistance situation and approved action plan; and
|
||
|
||
In subsequent growing seasons, maintain sales suspension and alternative resistance
|
||
management strategies in the affected region(s) for the Bt corn hybrids that are affected by
|
||
the resistant population until an EPA-approved local resistance management plan is in place
|
||
to mitigate the resistance.
|
||
|
||
A report on results of resistance monitoring and investigations of damage reports must be submitted to
|
||
EPA, on or before January 31st of each year, for the duration of the registration.
|
||
|
||
Page 14 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
2. EPA is imposing the following conditions for the Cry34/35Ab1, DvSnf7 dsRNA, and Cry3Bb1
|
||
toxins expressed in MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend:
|
||
a) Investigation of Reports of Unexpected Levels of Damage (UXD) by Corn Rootworm (CRW):
|
||
Performance Inquiries
|
||
|
||
1) Bayer is required to investigate "performance inquiries" (i.e., reports of unexpected CRW
|
||
damage to MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn) from
|
||
growers. Fields (defined as a tract separated by permanent boundaries such as fences,
|
||
permanent waterways, woodlands, croplines not subject to change because of farming
|
||
practices, or other similar features) with unexpected damage that meet both of the criteria
|
||
below must be subjected to the follow-up actions in part 2) below:
|
||
|
||
a. The affected plants are confirmed to be MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-
|
||
59122-7 Seed Blend corn plants (take leaf samples to determine the presence of the CRW-
|
||
active Bt protein); and
|
||
|
||
b. Corn rootworm feeding caused root damage with a Node Injury Score (NIS) > 0.5 on at
|
||
least 50% of plants surveyed in a transect sampling of the damaged site(s) within the field.
|
||
|
||
2) Follow-up actions (performance inquiries). For MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-
|
||
59122-7 Seed Blend corn fields meeting the criteria in part 1) above, Bayer must take the
|
||
following actions:
|
||
|
||
a. Collect at least 250 (ideally 500 or more) CRW adult individuals from the damaged site
|
||
within the field in question. Collections may be extended to the whole field, if necessary
|
||
to obtain sufficient CRW adult individuals. Collected populations must be subjected to the
|
||
steps described for "investigation of populations of concern" in section e(2)(b) below.
|
||
|
||
o If collections are unsuccessful, visit affected farm or field the following year
|
||
(assuming the grower continues to be a customer and repurchases seed and does not
|
||
rotate the field to a non-host crop) and attempt to collect CRW adults. If beetles are not
|
||
present the subsequent year, see section e(2)(b)(3)(c) below.
|
||
|
||
b. Review with the grower their CRW management practices and provide CRW management
|
||
recommendations including an assessment of corn fields with similar trait(s) adjacent to
|
||
the affected corn field that are managed by the same grower.
|
||
|
||
c. Use of single trait products containing the CRW traits in MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON
|
||
87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend in fields with unexpected damage in previous years
|
||
should be discouraged. Recommended management options include, but are not limited to,
|
||
the following:
|
||
|
||
o Primary option:
|
||
|
||
• Rotation to non-host crop (e.g., soybean)
|
||
|
||
o
|
||
Secondary options:
|
||
|
||
• Use of pyramided Bt corn products one or more different CRW PIP trait(s);
|
||
|
||
Page 15 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
|
||
• Use of different CRW PIP traits (i.e., an alternative CRW-active PIP);
|
||
|
||
• Use of non-PIP or non-CRW protected corn.
|
||
|
||
o Tertiary options:
|
||
|
||
• If additional pest management need is determined beyond the secondary options
|
||
listed above, use of the same pyramided Bt corn product is acceptable if it is very
|
||
unlikely that both of the traits are affected (e.g., the affected field experienced
|
||
UXD to one of the traits in the product in the previous year, the NIS is less than
|
||
1.0, there has been no continuous use of the second trait in the product in the
|
||
affected field, and Bayer has not been informed of resistance to the second trait in
|
||
the county)
|
||
|
||
• Additional corn rootworm control tools (e.g., soil applied insecticides, chemigation)
|
||
should be considered
|
||
|
||
d. If field(s) with UXD is/are planted to a non-host crop (e.g., soybean) the following year,
|
||
then the area will be considered “mitigated” (as discussed in section e(2)(b)(3)(d) below)
|
||
even if subsequent bioassay results show that the population was resistant. No further
|
||
action will be required by Bayer for the UXD case.
|
||
|
||
3) Bayer must submit an annual report to EPA detailing activities related to investigations of
|
||
unexpected damage (UXD). This report will include the information from the most recent and
|
||
previous corn growing seasons:
|
||
|
||
a. Information from the most recent season:
|
||
|
||
o The number of UXD reports investigated;
|
||
|
||
o Location (by county and state);
|
||
|
||
o CRW sampling (number and location of populations collected).
|
||
|
||
b. Information from the previous season:
|
||
|
||
o The final disposition of UXD fields from the previous season (i.e., the management
|
||
practices employed in response to UXD if the grower continues to be a customer.
|
||
|
||
o Results from bioassays conducted on CRW populations from UXD fields where the
|
||
primary management option, rotation to non-host crop, was not used.
|
||
|
||
c. Grower information, such as farm addresses or other personally identifiable information, or
|
||
other sensitive business/customer information must not be included in this report. This report
|
||
must be submitted by November 30th each year.
|
||
|
||
b) Investigation of Populations of Concern
|
||
|
||
1) Bayer must conduct investigations of all CRW populations collected as part of the performance
|
||
|
||
Page 16 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
inquiry process in section e(2)(a) above. These investigations must include the use of an EPA-
|
||
approved bioassay to determine if sampled CRW populations are resistant to any of the CRW
|
||
PIP toxins in MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend. Acceptable
|
||
assays must be able to function as diagnostic tools capable of distinguishing resistant populations
|
||
from susceptible ones. Unless previously approved, Bayer must consult with EPA on their
|
||
bioassay prior to its use.
|
||
|
||
2) A CRW population will be considered by EPA to be resistant to a CRW PIP toxin if the
|
||
following criteria are met and additional collections and testing are not deemed to be
|
||
necessary (based on part 3) below):
|
||
|
||
a. An initial performance inquiry investigation results in a finding of Unexpected Damage; and
|
||
|
||
b. Where green tissues are available and if plants are unusually stressed due to agronomic
|
||
and/or environmental factors, Bt protein levels in affected plants are found to be within the
|
||
documented range for that hybrid (if data are available); and
|
||
|
||
c. Either (A): On-plant bioassays of insect collections from the UXD fields result in the
|
||
following two statistically relevant comparisons:
|
||
|
||
i. A statistically significant difference in measures of either mortality or sublethal effects
|
||
(growth/development) between the field population and a relevant susceptible control
|
||
population (i.e., one that responds as a typical susceptible field population) on Bt corn
|
||
containing the single PIP and/or lack of a statistically significant difference in measures
|
||
of mortality or sublethal effect between the field population and a resistant positive
|
||
control population1; and
|
||
|
||
ii. A lack of a statistically significant difference in the same measures of the field
|
||
population raised on Bt corn containing the single PIP and non-PIP corn plants.
|
||
|
||
Or (B): Sublethal seedling bioassay of insect collections from the UXD fields result in two
|
||
statistically relevant comparisons:
|
||
|
||
i. A statistically significant difference in measures of sublethal effects
|
||
(growth/development) for populations on Bt corn containing the single PIP (normalized
|
||
using non-PIP) seedlings between the field population and a relevant susceptible
|
||
control population where available or historical field populations and/or lack of a
|
||
statistically significant difference in measures between the field population and a
|
||
resistant positive control population1; and
|
||
|
||
ii. A lack of a statistically significant difference in the same measures of the field
|
||
population raised on Bt corn seedlings containing the single PIP and non-PIP corn
|
||
seedlings
|
||
|
||
Or (C): Diet-based bioassays of insect collections from the UXD fields result in two
|
||
statistically relevant comparisons:
|
||
|
||
|
||
1 If a resistant positive control population is not available or accessible, Bayer must consult with EPA prior to initiating bioassays and
|
||
work to develop an appropriate resistant positive control population.
|
||
|
||
Page 17 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
i. A statistically significant difference in measures of lethal or sublethal effects
|
||
(growth/development) on diet containing the Bt protein (diagnostic concentration or
|
||
concentration-response measures) between the field population and a relevant
|
||
susceptible control population where available or historical field populations and/or
|
||
lack of a statistically significant difference in measures between field population and
|
||
a resistant positive control population1; and
|
||
|
||
ii. Either a lack of a statistically significant difference in the same measures of the field
|
||
population exposed to diet containing the Bt protein (diagnostic concentration) and
|
||
diet not containing the Bt protein and/or lack of a statistically significant difference
|
||
in measures between the field population and a resistant positive control population,
|
||
or lack of a statistically significant concentration and/or lack of a statistically
|
||
significant difference in concentration response between the field and a resistant
|
||
positive control population1.
|
||
|
||
3) Mitigation, as detailed in section e(2)(c) below, is required for any CRW population that meets
|
||
EPA’s resistance criteria above for any of the CRW traits in MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON
|
||
87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend, unless the circumstances described below are applicable.
|
||
|
||
a. To minimize the potential for incorrectly reaching a conclusion of resistance, another year of
|
||
CRW adult collections and additional testing is needed to determine resistance if:
|
||
|
||
i. The results of the bioassays are inconclusive (e.g., the results of the statistical analysis
|
||
are unclear because of low sample sizes); or
|
||
|
||
ii. Another reasonable explanation for the unexpected damage exists (e.g., high pest
|
||
pressure and/or high plant stress).
|
||
|
||
b. In these cases, Bayer and EPA will discuss and align on next steps before reaching any
|
||
resistance conclusion.
|
||
|
||
c. If CRW collections are not possible in the current year or subsequent year due to successful
|
||
management practices, then no further investigation is needed. The population would be
|
||
considered "mitigated" meaning, in this case, that the population is suppressed or extirpated
|
||
for the UXD field. However, EPA recommends that Bayer continue to be vigilant in areas
|
||
where CRW populations were successfully mitigated.
|
||
|
||
d. If a UXD field receives non-host crop (e.g., soybean) rotation the following year as described
|
||
in Section e(2)(a)(2) above, no additional mitigation is subsequently required.
|
||
|
||
c) Mitigation of CRW Populations Meeting EPA’s Resistance Criteria
|
||
|
||
1) For any CRW population found to be resistant to one or more of the CRW traits in MON 89034
|
||
x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend under EPA’s criteria described in section
|
||
e(2)(b) above, Bayer must take the following steps:
|
||
|
||
a) Bayer must inform EPA of all the results of the bioassays as soon as possible, but at least
|
||
within 30 days if measures are triggered.
|
||
|
||
Page 18 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
b) The mitigation action area (MAA) is defined as the growers’ farming operation up to a ½
|
||
mile radius from the damaged site that produced the resistant population.
|
||
|
||
c) Within 30 days of informing EPA of the results of the bioassays, Bayer must notify state
|
||
extension agents and crop consultants who operate within the county in which resistance was
|
||
identified. Information shared must include identification of the county in which resistance
|
||
was detected and trait(s) affected.
|
||
|
||
d) Within the MAA, Bayer must do the following:
|
||
|
||
i. Prior to finalizing the grower’s seed order for the following season, inform the affected
|
||
grower and other registrants that hold registrations containing the compromised trait(s).
|
||
Bayer must also inform neighboring growers if those growers are customers of Bayer.
|
||
Information shared must include identification of the county in which resistance was
|
||
detected and trait(s) affected;
|
||
|
||
ii. Discontinue sales/planting of products containing the compromised trait(s) without
|
||
additional/alternative (i.e. non-compromised) CRW traits until resistance has been
|
||
demonstrated to have been mitigated. Other Bt registrants selling such products in the
|
||
MAA are encouraged, but cannot be required, to follow suit;
|
||
|
||
iii. Bayer must monitor the resistant population in the MAA, as long as grower remains a
|
||
customer of the company, until mitigation has been demonstrated as described in part e
|
||
below unless otherwise agreed with EPA.
|
||
|
||
iv. Require any pyramids sold by Bayer containing the compromised trait(s) be planted
|
||
with a 20% refuge until resistance has been demonstrated to have been mitigated. Other
|
||
Bt corn registrants selling such pyramided products in the MAA are encouraged, but
|
||
cannot be required by this term of registration, to follow suit;
|
||
|
||
v. For Bayer’s affected customer’s field(s), the mitigation goal is to control the resistant
|
||
CRW population. Within the MAA Bayer shall encourage the use of “Mitigation
|
||
Practices” including:
|
||
|
||
1. Primary option: Rotation to a non-host crop (e.g., soybean);
|
||
|
||
2. Secondary options:
|
||
a. Use of pyramided Bt corn products with different CRW PIP traits;
|
||
|
||
b. Only in the case that the resistance definition for one of the CRW traits in the
|
||
MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend is not met,
|
||
continued use of the product with a 20% refuge;
|
||
|
||
c. Use of different CRW PIP traits (i.e., an alternative CRW-active PIP);
|
||
|
||
d. Use of non-PIP corn or non-CRW protected corn (with/without soil-applied
|
||
insecticide);
|
||
|
||
Page 19 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
3. Tertiary options:
|
||
|
||
a. If additional pest management need is determined beyond the secondary options
|
||
listed above, additional CRW control tools (e.g., soil insecticides, seed-applied
|
||
insecticides, chemigation) should be used.
|
||
|
||
b. Use of foliar applications to control adults (when appropriate economic
|
||
thresholds have been met) may be used in conjunction with one or more of the
|
||
above.
|
||
|
||
e) A resistant CRW population in the MAA will be considered mitigated if one of the following
|
||
criteria is met:
|
||
|
||
i. Corn fields within the MAA are rotated to a non-host crop (e.g. soybean) for one
|
||
growing season.
|
||
|
||
ii. After implementation of mitigation practices (part d.v above), resistance monitoring
|
||
(sampling) is conducted but few CRW are found (i.e., <0.1 adults per plant) and
|
||
environmental conditions (e.g., weather) are unlikely to be responsible for the lack of
|
||
adult CRW presence. If environmental conditions are a factor, then monitoring should
|
||
continue for another season.
|
||
|
||
iii. After implementation practices (part d.v above), resistance monitoring (sampling) is
|
||
conducted, CRW are found and collected, and bioassays (section e(2)(b)(2) above)
|
||
show that the population susceptibility to the compromised trait(s) has returned to
|
||
baseline levels.
|
||
|
||
f) The mitigation actions in part d above can be lifted, and growers can resume the use of MON
|
||
89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn as a primary tool for CRW
|
||
management in the MAA, only when Bayer demonstrates that successful mitigation as
|
||
described in part e above has been achieved.
|
||
|
||
2) Based on further research to understand CRW resistance to Bt PIPs, EPA will consider
|
||
refinements to the resistance mitigation program. Such research may include characterizing the
|
||
genetics of resistance (e.g., number of genes, functional dominance, mechanism of resistance,
|
||
and cross-resistance) and the biology of resistant insects (e.g., fitness in the presence and absence
|
||
of the product), and other control tactics.
|
||
|
||
f. Refuge Assurance Program for MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
|
||
Bayer must implement a Blended Seed Refuge Assurance Program designed to ensure MON 89034 x
|
||
TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn products are formulated with the appropriate rate
|
||
of refuge seeds. The program must include the following four elements:
|
||
|
||
1. Trait purity check on seed lots prior to blending;
|
||
|
||
2. ISO 9000 Standard Operating Procedures for the blending process;
|
||
|
||
3. Calibration of blending equipment; and
|
||
|
||
Page 20 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
4. Records and data retention records for seed blend products.
|
||
|
||
Calibration records - Bayer will retain documentation for a specified period of time on the
|
||
equipment calibration including the procedure, when it was conducted and the results.
|
||
|
||
Blend proportion records (weight and kernel based) - Bayer will retain documentation for a specified
|
||
period of time on the kernel per pound data of the components, the calculations to determine the
|
||
proportions based on weight and the actual weights that are blended together to make up an MON
|
||
89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend corn product by seed lot.
|
||
|
||
All records must be maintained at the Bayer blending facility and must be available for the EPA review
|
||
upon request.
|
||
|
||
Should Bayer CropScience LP or its Licensees be notified by USDA/AMS or State Seed Control Officials
|
||
that their seed blend products have been found to have a lower percentage of the refuge component than is
|
||
represented on the label, they must notify EPA within 30 days. This would constitute information
|
||
reportable under FIFRA 6(a)(2).
|
||
|
||
g. Annual Reporting Requirements for MON 89034 x TC1507 x MON 87411 x DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
|
||
The following annual reports must be submitted:
|
||
|
||
1. Compliance Assurance Plan: Compliance Assurance Program activities, including IRM Grower Survey
|
||
results and on-farm assessment results for the prior year and plans for the compliance assurance program
|
||
for the current year, on or before January 31st each year.
|
||
|
||
2. Insect Resistance Monitoring Results (Cry1A.105, Cry2Ab2, and Cry1F only): results of monitoring and
|
||
investigations of damage reports, January 31st of each year.
|
||
|
||
3. IPM Stewardship Program (Cry34/35Ab1, DvSnf7 dsRNA, and Cry3Bb1 only): Activities conducted
|
||
under the IPM stewardship program, including an anonymous survey of grower practices, adoption
|
||
levels of the various crop rotation options (if employed) and other elements of the stewardship program,
|
||
on or before January 31st of each year.
|
||
|
||
4. Unexpected Damage Investigations (Cry34/35Ab1, DvSnf7 dsRNA, and Cry3Bb1only): Activities
|
||
related to investigations of unexpected damage (UXD), including number and location of UXD cases,
|
||
insect sampling, bioassays, and final disposition of UXD fields from the most recent and previous corn
|
||
growing seasons, on or before November 30th of each year.
|
||
|
||
Should you wish to add/retain a reference to your company’s website on your label, then please be aware that
|
||
the website becomes labeling under FIFRA and is subject to review by the EPA. If the website is false or
|
||
misleading, the product will be considered to be misbranded and sale or distribution of the product is unlawful
|
||
under FIFRA section 12(a)(1)(E). 40 CFR § 156.10(a)(5) lists examples of statements the EPA may consider
|
||
false or misleading. In addition, regardless of whether a website is referenced on your product’s label, claims
|
||
made on the website may not substantially differ from those claims approved through the registration process.
|
||
Therefore, should the EPA find or if it is brought to our attention that a website contains false or misleading
|
||
statements or claims substantially differing from the EPA-approved registration, the website will be referred to
|
||
the EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.
|
||
|
||
Page 21 of 21
|
||
EPA Reg. No. 524‐631
|
||
OPP ACC No. 00308647 and 00308663
|
||
Your release for shipment of this product constitutes acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you fail to
|
||
satisfy these terms and conditions, the EPA will consider appropriate regulatory action including, among other
|
||
things, cancellation under FIFRA section 6(e).
|
||
|
||
A stamped copy of the labeling is enclosed for your records. Please also note that the record for this product
|
||
currently contains the following acceptable Confidential Statement of Formula (CSF):
|
||
|
||
Basic CSF dated 2/26/2016
|
||
|
||
If you have any questions, please contact Matt Weiner by phone at (202) 564-1509 or via email at
|
||
weiner.matthew@epa.gov.
|
||
|
||
S i n c e r e l y ,
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Alan Reynolds, Team Leader
|
||
Emerging Technologies Branch
|
||
Biopesticides and Pollution
|
||
Prevention Division (7511M)
|
||
Office of Pesticide Programs
|
||
|
||
|
||
Enclosure
|
||
|
||
Plant-Incorporated Protectant Label
|
||
MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 Seed Blend
|
||
Insect-Protected, Herbicide-Tolerant Corn
|
||
(OECD Unique Identifier: MON-89Ø34-3 × DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 × MON-87411-9 × DAS-59122-7)
|
||
Active Ingredients:
|
||
dsRNA transcript comprising a DvSnf7 inverted repeat sequence derived from Diabrotica
|
||
virgifera virgifera, and the genetic material (vector PV-ZMIR10871) necessary for its production
|
||
in MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 (OECD Unique Identifier
|
||
MON-89Ø34-3 × DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 × MON-87411-9 × DAS-59122-7) ............ ≤ 0.00000044%*
|
||
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A.105 protein and the genetic material (vector PV-ZMIR245)
|
||
necessary for its production in MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 (OECD
|
||
Unique Identifier MON-89Ø34-3 × DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 × MON-87411-9 × DAS-59122-7) ............
|
||
.................................................................................................................................... ≤ 0.0088%*
|
||
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ab2 protein and the genetic material (vector PV-ZMIR245)
|
||
necessary for its production in MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 (OECD
|
||
Unique Identifier MON-89Ø34-3 × DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 × MON-87411-9 × DAS-59122-7) ............
|
||
.................................................................................................................................... ≤ 0.0048%*
|
||
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1F protein and the genetic material (vector PHP8999) necessary for its
|
||
production in MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 (OECD Unique Identifier
|
||
MON-89Ø34-3 × DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 × MON-87411-9 × DAS-59122-7) .................. ≤ 0.00096%*
|
||
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bb1 protein and the genetic material (vector PV-ZMIR10871)
|
||
necessary for its production in MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 (OECD
|
||
Unique Identifier MON-89Ø34-3 × DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 × MON-87411-9 × DAS 59122 7) ............
|
||
.................................................................................................................................... ≤ 0.0041%*
|
||
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry34Ab1 protein and the genetic material (vector PHP17662) necessary
|
||
for its production in MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 (OECD Unique
|
||
Identifier MON-89Ø34-3 × DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 × MON-87411-9 × DAS-59122-7) ....... ≤ 0.012%*
|
||
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry35Ab1 protein and the genetic material (vector PHP17662) necessary
|
||
for its production in MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 (OECD Unique
|
||
Identifier MON-89Ø34-3 × DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 × MON-87411-9 × DAS-59122-7) ..... ≤ 0.0026%*
|
||
Other Ingredients:
|
||
06/14/2022
|
||
524-631
|
||
|
||
The marker protein CP4 EPSPS and the genetic material (vector PV-ZMIR10871) necessary for
|
||
its production in MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 (OECD Unique
|
||
Identifier MON-89Ø34-3 × DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 × MON-87411-9 × DAS-59122-7) ....... ≤ 0.036%*
|
||
|
||
The marker protein PAT and the genetic material (vector PHP17662) necessary for its
|
||
production in MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 (OECD Unique Identifier
|
||
MON-89Ø34-3 × DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 × MON-87411-9 × DAS-59122-7) .................... ≤ 0.0001%*
|
||
|
||
*Percentage (wt/wt) on a dry weight basis for forage tissue
|
||
|
||
|
||
KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN
|
||
|
||
CAUTION
|
||
|
||
NET CONTENTS_______
|
||
|
||
EPA Registration No. 524-631
|
||
|
||
EPA Establishment No. 524-MO-002
|
||
|
||
Bayer CropScience LP
|
||
800 North Lindbergh Blvd.
|
||
St. Louis, MO 63167
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
DIRECTIONS FOR USE
|
||
|
||
It is a violation of Federal law to use this product in any manner inconsistent with its labeling.
|
||
This product must be used as specified in the terms and conditions of the registration.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
This Plant-Incorporated Protectant (PIP) may be combined or produced through conventional
|
||
breeding with other registered plant-incorporated protectants that are similarly approved for use
|
||
in combination, through conventional breeding, with other registered plant-incorporated
|
||
protectants to produce inbred corn lines and hybrid corn varieties with combined pesticidal traits.
|
||
|
||
MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed blend protects corn crops from leaf,
|
||
stalk, and ear damage caused by lepidopteran c orn pests listed on this label and root damage
|
||
caused by corn rootworm larvae listed on this label. In order to minimize the risk of these pests
|
||
developing resistance to MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed blend, an
|
||
insect resistance management plan must be imp lemented as defined in th e registration terms and
|
||
conditions.
|
||
|
||
Grower agreements will specify that growers must adhere to the refuge requirements that will be
|
||
described on the bag or ba g/tag for MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed
|
||
blend or other applicable product use documents.
|
||
|
||
Sales of corn hybrids that contain Bayer’s Bt corn plant-incorporated pesticide(s) must be
|
||
accompanied by either an IRM/Grower Guide or information on the bag or bag-tag on planting,
|
||
production, and insect resistance management and notes that routine applications of insecticides
|
||
to control these insects are usually unnecessary when corn containing the B.t. proteins is planted.
|
||
|
||
Corn seed bags or bag tags for products containing MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 ×
|
||
DAS-59122-7 seed blend must include the refuge size requirement in text and graphical format.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
INSECT RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT
|
||
|
||
Growers are instructed to read information on inse ct resistance management in the bag and/or
|
||
bag-tag.
|
||
|
||
These refuge requirements do not apply to pl anting of inbred/hybrid corn seed productions,
|
||
breeding, and small scale research trials on up to a total of 20,000 acres per county and up to a
|
||
combined United States (U.S.) total of 250,000 acres per plant-incorporated protectant (PIP)
|
||
active ingredient per registrant per year.
|
||
|
||
The seed producer must ensure a minimum of 5% non-PIP refuge seed is included with
|
||
MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 in each lot of seed corn. The refuge seed
|
||
in the seed mixture may not be treated with seed-applied insecticides for corn rootworm (CRW)
|
||
control unless the MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed in the seed
|
||
mixture receives the same treatment.
|
||
|
||
The IRM/Grower Guide for MON 89034 × T C1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed blend
|
||
or comparable information presented on the product bag or bag-tag must contain the following
|
||
information:
|
||
|
||
This product is a seed mixture containing MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 ×
|
||
DAS-59122-7 and a minimum of 5% non- B.t. seed that when planted creates an interspersed
|
||
refuge within the field. There are no requirements for a separate structured refuge for
|
||
MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed blend when planted in the U.S.
|
||
corn-growing region, including Alaska and Hawaii, because the refuge seed is contained within
|
||
the bag/container.
|
||
|
||
The interspersed refuge can only be used by planting seed corn specifically generated by
|
||
qualified seed producers/conditioners licensed by th e registrant. Insecticidal treatments labeled
|
||
for adult CRW control are discouraged during the time of adult CRW emergence.
|
||
|
||
The seed mix refuge option for MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed
|
||
blend satisfies the refuge requirements in all regions other than in the cotton-growing
|
||
region where corn earworm is a significant pest as defined below.
|
||
|
||
Additional refuge requirements in the cotton -growing region where corn earworm is a
|
||
significant pest
|
||
In the cotton-growing region where corn earworm is a significant pest, as defined below,
|
||
MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed blend requires the planting of an
|
||
additional 20% structured refuge (i.e., 20 acres of non- B.t. corn for every 80 acres of
|
||
MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed blend planted).
|
||
|
||
The 20% refuge must be planted with corn hybrids that do not contain B.t. technologies for the
|
||
control of corn rootworms or corn borers. The refuge and the MON 89034 × TC1507 ×
|
||
MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed blend should be so wn on the same day or with the shortest
|
||
window possible between planting dates to ensure that corn root developm ent is similar among
|
||
varieties. The structured refuge may be planted as an in-field or adjacent (e.g., across the road)
|
||
refuge or planted as a separate block that is within ½ mile of the MON 89034 × TC1507 ×
|
||
MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed blend field. In-fie ld refuge options include blocks, perimeter
|
||
strips (i.e., strips around the field), or in-field strips. If perimeter or in-field strips are
|
||
implemented, the strips must be at least four (4) consecutive rows wide. The refuge can be
|
||
protected from lepidopteran damage by use of non- B.t. insecticides if the population of one or
|
||
more target lepidopteran pests of MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed
|
||
blend in the refuge exceeds economic thresholds. In addition, the refuge can be protected from
|
||
CRW damage by an appropriate seed treatment or so il insecticide; however, insecticides labeled
|
||
for adult CRW control must be avoided in the refuge during the period of CRW adult emergence.
|
||
Economic thresholds will be determined using methods recommended by local or regional
|
||
professionals (e.g., Extension Service agents, crop consultants).
|
||
|
||
The cotton-growing region requiring the additional 20% refuge consists of the following states:
|
||
Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, North Carolina, Mississippi, South Carolina,
|
||
Oklahoma (only the counties of B eckham, Caddo, Comanche, Cus ter, Greer, Harmon, Jackson,
|
||
Kay, Kiowa, Tillman, and Washita), Tennessee (onl y the counties of Carrol l, Chester, Crockett,
|
||
Dyer, Fayette, Franklin, Gibson, Hardema n, Hardin, Haywood, Lake, Lauderdale, Lincoln,
|
||
Madison, Obion, Rutherford, Shelby, and Tipton), Texas (except the counties of Carson, Dallam,
|
||
Hansford, Hartley, Hutchinson, Lipscomb, Moore, Ochiltree, Roberts, and Sherman), Virginia
|
||
(only the counties of Dinwiddie, Franklin City, Greensville, Isle of Wight, Northampton,
|
||
Southampton, Suffolk City, Surrey, and Sussex) , and Missouri (only the counties of Dunklin,
|
||
New Madrid, Pemiscot, Scott, and Stoddard).
|
||
|
||
Corn Insects Controlled or Suppressed
|
||
|
||
European corn borer (ECB) Ostrinia nubilalis
|
||
Southwestern corn borer (SWCB) Diatraea grandiosella
|
||
Southern cornstalk borer (SCSB) Diatraea crambidoides
|
||
Corn earworm (CEW) Helicoverpa zea
|
||
Fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda
|
||
Stalk borer Papaipema nebris
|
||
Lesser corn stalk borer Elasmopalpus lignosellus
|
||
Sugarcane borer (SCB) Diatraea saccharalis
|
||
Black cutworm Agrotis ipsilon
|
||
|
||
Western corn rootworm (WCRW) Diabrotica virgifera virgifera
|
||
Northern corn rootworm (NCRW) Diabrotica barberi
|
||
Mexican corn rootworm (MCRW) Diabrotica virgifera zeae
|
||
|
||
|
||
__________________________
|
||
|
||
MON 89034 × TC1507 × MON 87411 × DAS-59122-7 seed blend is a product of Bayer’s research program
|
||
offering unique genetic characteristics for specific grower needs and may be protected by one or more of the
|
||
following U.S. patents that can be found at http://www.monsantotechnology.com
|