a97107de46
Image rebuild (skip scrape) / build (push) Failing after 1h37m12s
Dockerfile: self-contained image with corpus + Chroma + BM25 baked in. Drawbar's compose pulls + runs without volume mounts. Built from sources.json (labels schema), PRODUCT_NAME=crop_chem by default, HYBRID_SEARCH=true (always-on for production quality). RERANK_URL + OLLAMA_URL get set at compose time. .gitea/workflows/refresh.yml: monthly cron (1st @ 06:00 UTC) does full scrape → reindex → image push. Scrapes Bayer (~30 min) + EPA PPLS row-crop filtered (~7h). Skips reindex+push if no corpus diff. Tags pushed: :latest, :<sha12>, :corpus-<YYYY.MM.DD>. .gitea/workflows/image-only.yml: on-demand or auto on code-only pushes to main (paths: docs_mcp/, rag/, scrape/, requirements.txt, Dockerfile, sources.json). Reindexes from committed corpus, builds image, pushes. ~10 min vs ~9h full refresh. .gitignore: corpus/ now COMMITTED (4,159 labels, 265 MB of .md + sidecars). Lets image-only.yml rebuild indexes without re-scraping. chroma/ + bm25/ still gitignored (regenerable binary indexes). .dockerignore: drops venv, eval results, PLAN/README/CLAUDE.md, deploy/, .git/ — keeps the image lean. corpus + chroma + bm25 explicitly NOT in dockerignore (those go INTO the image). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
435 lines
25 KiB
Markdown
435 lines
25 KiB
Markdown
# MON 863 X MON 810
|
||
|
||
- EPA Reg No: **524-545**
|
||
- Registrant: BAYER CROPSCIENCE, LLC
|
||
- Signal word: Caution
|
||
- Active ingredients: Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3B1 protein and the genetic material necessary for its production (Vector ZMIR 13L) in corn (0.016%); Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab protein and the genetic material (PV-ZMBK07) necessary for its production in corn event MON-00810-6; % dry weight (0.005%)
|
||
- Label accepted: 2009-03-19
|
||
- Source PDF: https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/000524-00545-20090319.pdf
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
. 3/ I'q, / UJO'1
|
||
UNITED C:rES ENVIR9NMEN.TAL PROTECTION AC _ JCY
|
||
Ms. Margaret Wideman
|
||
Regulatory Affairs Manager
|
||
Monsanto Company
|
||
800 North Lindbergh Blvd
|
||
St. Louis, MO 63167
|
||
Dear Ms. Wideman:
|
||
MAR 1 S20m
|
||
Subject: Your September 4, 2008 Amendment Request to Amend the Insect Resistance
|
||
Management Terms and Conditions for MON 863 x MON 810
|
||
EPA Registration No. 524-545
|
||
The amendment referred to above, submitted in connection with registration under
|
||
section 3 (c)(7)(A)of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended, are
|
||
acceptable subject to the following comments.
|
||
Insect Resistance Management:
|
||
The listed IRM terms and conditions are being modified as follows.
|
||
1) Under 8a. Refuge Requirements, the following statement is added "These refuge
|
||
requirements do not apply to seed propagation of inbred and hybrid corn seed corn up to a total
|
||
of 20,000 acres per county and up to a combined U.S. total of 250,000 acres per PIP active
|
||
ingredient per registrant per year."
|
||
,2) Under 8d. Insect Resistance Monitoring and 8e. Remedial Action Plans, the CrylAb-related
|
||
portions (European corn beirer, Southwestern corn borer, and corn earworm; MON 810; 524-489)
|
||
are removed and replaced by 8f. below. Further the 8d and 8e headings are modified to read as
|
||
8d. Cry3Bbl Insect Resistance Monitoring and 8e. Cry3Bbl Remedial Action Plans.
|
||
8f. Cryl Ab Insect Resistance Monitoring
|
||
The Agency is imposing the following cOnditions for this product:
|
||
The'registrant will monitor for resistance to its lepidopteran-resistant Bt com. The monitoring
|
||
program shall consist of two approaches: (1) focused population sampling and l~boratory testing;
|
||
and (2).investigation of reports ofless-than expected control oflabeled insects. Should field
|
||
relevant resistance be confimied, an appropriate resistance management action plan will be
|
||
. SVM~ ~ii:·~ilf..······I·········'···········I··=~~~~~E·l··················1·····················1·····················1······················ :;:E B::t:i1 ... · ..................... : ..................... · ..................................................................................... .
|
||
EPA Form 1320-1 A '(1/90) , Printed on Recycled Paper OFFICIAL FILE COpy
|
||
.. U,S, Government Printing Omce: 2005 ~ (mac)
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
(1) Focused Population Sampling
|
||
The registrant shall annually sample and bioassay populations of the key target pests Ostrinia
|
||
nubilalis (European corn borer; ECB), Diatraea grandiosella (Southwestern corn borer; S
|
||
WCB), and Helicoverpa zea (corn earworm; CEW). Sampling for the target pests will be focused
|
||
in areas identified as those with the highest risk of resistance development (e.g., where
|
||
lepidopteran-active Bt hybrids are planted on a high proportion of the corn acres, and where the
|
||
insect species are regarded as key pests of corn). Bioassay methods must be appropriate for the
|
||
goal of detecting field-relevant shifts in population response to lepidopteran resistant Bt corn
|
||
and/or changes in resistance allele frequency in response to the use ofBt corn and, as far as
|
||
possible, should be consistent across sampling years to enable comparisons with historical data.
|
||
The number of populations to be collected shall reflect the regional importance of the insect
|
||
species as a pest, and specific collection regions will be identified for each pest. For ECB, a
|
||
minimum of 12 populations across the sampling region will be targeted for collection at each
|
||
annual sampling. For SWCB, the target will be a minimum of six populations. For CEW, the
|
||
target will be a minimum of 10 populations. Pest populations should be collected from multiple
|
||
corn'-growing states reflective of different geographies and agronomic conditions. To obtain
|
||
sufficient sensitivity to detect resistance alleles before they become common enough to cause
|
||
measurable field damage, each population collection shall attempt to target 400 insect genomes
|
||
(egg masses, larvae, mated females, and/or mixed-sex adults), but a successful population
|
||
collection will contain a minimum of 100 genomes. It is recognized that it may not be possible to
|
||
collect the target number of insect populations or genomes due to factors such as natural
|
||
fluctuations in pest density, environmental conditions, and area-wide pest suppression.
|
||
The sampling program and geographic range of collections may be modified as appropriate
|
||
based on changes in pest importance and for the adoption levels oflepidopteran-resistant Bt
|
||
corn. The Agency shall be consulted prior to the implementation of such modifications.
|
||
The registrant will report to the Agency before August 31 each year the results of
|
||
the population sampling and bioassay monitoring program.
|
||
Any incidence of unusually low sensitivity to the Bt protein in bioassays shall be investigated as
|
||
soon as possible to understand any field relevance of such a finding. Such investigations shall .
|
||
proceed in a stepwise manner until the field relevance can be either confirmed or refuted, and
|
||
results of these shall be reported to the Agency annually before August 31. The investigative
|
||
steps will include:
|
||
1. Re-test progeny of the collected population to determine whether the unusual
|
||
bioassay response is reproducible and heritable. If it is not reproducible and
|
||
heritable, no further action is required.
|
||
2. If the unusual response is reproducible and heritable, progeny of insects that
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
survive the diagnostic concentration will be tested using methods that are
|
||
representative of exposure to Bt com hybrids under field conditions. If progeny
|
||
do not survive to adulthood, any suspected resistance is not field relevant and no
|
||
further action is required.
|
||
3. Ifinsects survive steps 1 and 2, resistance is confirmed, and further steps will be
|
||
taken to evaluate the resistance. These steps may include:
|
||
• determining the nature of the resistance (i.e., recessive or dominant, and the level
|
||
of functional dominance);
|
||
• estimating the resistance-allele frequency in the original population;
|
||
• detennining whether the resistance-allele frequency is increasing by analyzing
|
||
field collections in subsequent years sampled from .the same site where the
|
||
resistance allele(s) was originally collected;
|
||
• detennining the geographic distribution of the resistance allele by analyzing field
|
||
collections in subsequent years from sites surrounding the site where the
|
||
resistance allele(s) was originally collected.
|
||
Should field-relevant resistance be confirmed, and the resistance appears to be
|
||
increasing or spreading, the registrant will consult with the Agency to develop
|
||
and implement a case-specific resistance management action plan.
|
||
(2) Investigation of Reports of Unexpected Levels of Damage by the Target
|
||
Pests:
|
||
The registrant will follow up on grower; extension specialist or consultant reports
|
||
of unexpected levels of damage by the lepidopteran pests listed on the pesticide
|
||
label. The registrant will instruct its customers to contact them if such incidents
|
||
occur. The registrant will investigate all legitimate reports submitted to the
|
||
company or the company's representatives.
|
||
If reports of unexpected levels of damage lead to the suspicion of resistance in
|
||
any of the key target pests (ECB, SWCB, and CEW), the registrant will
|
||
implement the actions described below, based on the following definitions of
|
||
suspected resistance and confirmed resistance.
|
||
Suspected resistance
|
||
EP A defines suspected resistance to mean field reports of unexpected levels of
|
||
3
|
||
3
|
||
./"
|
||
I~
|
||
|
||
insect feeding damage for which:
|
||
• the com in question has been confinned to be lepidopteran-active Bt com;
|
||
• the seed used had the proper percentage of com expressing Bt protein;
|
||
• the relevant planttissues are expressing the expected level of Bt protein; and
|
||
• it has been ruled out that species not susceptible to the protein could be
|
||
responsible for the damage, that no climatic or cultural reasons could be
|
||
. responsible for the damage, and that that there could be no other reasonable
|
||
causes for the damage.
|
||
The Agency does not interpret suspected resistance to mean grower reports of
|
||
possible control failures or suspicious results from annual insect monitoring
|
||
assays, nor does the Agency intend that extensive field studies and testing be
|
||
undertaken to confinn scientifically the presence of insects resistant to Bt com in
|
||
commercial production fields before responsive measures are undertaken.
|
||
If resistance is suspected, the registrant will instruct growers to do the following:
|
||
• Use alternative control measures in the Bt com fields in the affected region to
|
||
control the target pest during the immediate growing season.
|
||
• Destroy Bt com crop residues in the affected region within one month after
|
||
harvest with a technique appropriate for local production practices to minimize
|
||
the possibility of resistant insects ov~r-wintering and contributing to the next
|
||
season's target pest population.
|
||
Additionally, if possible, and prior to the application of alternative control
|
||
measures or destruction of crop residue, the registrant will collect samples of the
|
||
insect population in the affected fields for laboratory rearing and testing. Such rearing and testing
|
||
shall be conducted as expeditiously as practical.
|
||
Confirmed resistance
|
||
EPA defines confirmed resistance to mean, in the case of field reports of unexpected levels of
|
||
damage from the key target pests, that all the following criteria are met:
|
||
• There is >30% insect survival and commensurate insect feeding in a bioassay, initiated
|
||
with neonate larvae, that uses methods that are representative of exposure to Bt com
|
||
hybrids under field conditions (ECB and SWCB oniy).
|
||
4
|
||
~
|
||
I)
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
• In standardized laboratory bioassays using diagnostic concentrations of the Bt protein
|
||
suited to the target pest in question, the pest exhibits resistance that has a genetic basis
|
||
and the level of survivorship indicates that there may be a resistance allele frequency of::::
|
||
0.1 in the sampled population. .
|
||
• In standardized laboratory bioassays, the LCso exceeds the upper limit of the 95%
|
||
confidence interval of the LCso for susceptible populations surveyed both in the original
|
||
baselines developed for this pest species and in previous years of field monitoring.
|
||
(3) Response to Confirmed Resistance in a Key Target Pest as the Cause of Unexpected
|
||
Levels of Damage in the Field
|
||
When field resistance is confirmed (as defined above), the following steps will be taken by the
|
||
registrant:
|
||
• EPA will receive notificatioJ;l within 30 days of resistance confinnation;
|
||
• Affected customers and extension agents will be notified about confinned resistance
|
||
within 30 days;
|
||
• Monitoring will be increased in the affected area and local target pest populations will be
|
||
sampled annually to detennine the extent and impact of resistance;
|
||
• If appropriate (depending on the resistant pest species, the extent of resistance, the timing
|
||
of resistance, and the nature of resistance, and the availability of suitable alternative
|
||
control measures), alternative control measures will be employed to reduce or control
|
||
target pest populations in the affected area. Alternative control measures may include
|
||
advising customers and extension agents in the affected area to incorporate crop residues
|
||
into the soil following harvest to minimize the possibility of over-wintering insects,
|
||
and/or applications of chemical insecticides;
|
||
• Unless otherwise agreed with EPA, stop sale and distribution of the relevant
|
||
lepidopteran-active Bt com hybrids in the affected area immediately until an effective
|
||
local mitigation plan approved by EPA has been implemerited;
|
||
• The registrant will develop a case-specific resistance management action plan within 90
|
||
days according to the characteristics of the resistance event and . local agronomic needs.
|
||
The registrant will consult with appropriate stakeholders in the development of the action
|
||
plan, and the details of such a plan shall be approved by EPA prior to implementation;
|
||
• Notify affected parties (e.g. growers, consultants, extension agents, seed distributors,
|
||
university cooperators and state/federal authorities as appropriate) in the region of the
|
||
resistance situation and approved action plan; and
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
• In subsequent growing seasons, maintain sales suspension and alternative r€?sistance
|
||
management strategies in the affected region(s) for the Bt com hybrids that are affected
|
||
by the resistant population until an EP A -approved local resistance management plan is in
|
||
place to mitigate the resistance.
|
||
A report on results of resistance monitoring and investigations of damage reports. must be
|
||
submitted to the Agency annually by August 31 st each year for the duration of the conditional
|
||
registration. .
|
||
If these conditions are not complied with, the registration will be subject to cancellation
|
||
in accordance with FIFRA section 6(e). Your release for shipment of Cry lAb com constitutes
|
||
acceptance of these conditions.
|
||
A stamped copy of the FIFRA label is enclosed for your records.
|
||
Sincerely,
|
||
cf!:!du~ef
|
||
Microbial Pesticides Branch
|
||
Biopesticides and Pollution
|
||
Prevention Division (7511P)
|
||
6
|
||
b
|
||
./"
|
||
13
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
MON 863 x MON 810
|
||
Rootworm-and Corn Borer-Protected Corn Seed
|
||
(OECD Unique Identifier: MON-00863-5 x MON-00810-6)
|
||
This product is effective in controlling com leaf, stalk and ear damage caused by corn borers
|
||
and root feeding damage caused by com rootworm larvae.
|
||
Active Ingredient:
|
||
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Bbl protein and the genetic material necessary for its production
|
||
(Vector ZMIR13L) in MON 863 com (OECD Unique Identifier: MON-00863-5) ............ .
|
||
... .... .... ..................... ........ ........................ ............................ .. 0.003 - 0.0160/0
|
||
Bacillus thuringiensis CrylAb delta-endotoxin and the genetic material necessary for its
|
||
production (Vector PV-ZMCTOl) in event MON 810 .com (OECD Unique Identifier:
|
||
MON-00810-6): ........................................................................ 0.002 - 0.005%
|
||
Other Ingredients:
|
||
Substance produced by a marker gene and the genetic material necessary for its production
|
||
(Vector ZMIR13L) in event MON 863 com (OECD Unique Identifier: MON-00863-5)
|
||
......................................................................................... 0.00005 - 0.0001 %
|
||
Percentage (wt/wt) on a dry weight basis for whole plant (forage).
|
||
CAUTION
|
||
KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN
|
||
NET CONTENTS ___ _
|
||
EPA Registration No. 524-545
|
||
EPA Establishment No. 524-MO-002
|
||
Monsanto Company
|
||
800 North Lindbergh Blvd.
|
||
St. Louis, MO 63198
|
||
13
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
. DIRECTIONS FOR USE
|
||
It is a violation of Federal law to use this product in any manner inconsistent with this
|
||
labeling~ The following information regarding commercial production must be included in
|
||
the MON 863 x MON 810 Technology Use Guide (IRM Guide).
|
||
MON 863 x MON 810 protects com crops from leaf, stalk, and ear damage caused by com
|
||
borers and root damage caused by com rootworm larvae. In order to minimize the risk of
|
||
these pests developing resistance to MON 863 x MON 810 com, an insect resistance
|
||
management plan must be implemented which includes planting of a structured refuge.
|
||
This plant-incorporated protectant may be combined through conventional breeding with
|
||
other registered plant-incorporatedprotectants that are similarly approved for use in
|
||
combination, through conventional breeding, with other plant-incorporated protectants to
|
||
produce inbred com lines and hybrid com varieties with combined pesticidal traits.
|
||
INSECT RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT
|
||
Corn Belt / Noncotton Growing Region Refuge Requirements
|
||
For MON 863 x MON 810 com groWn in noncotton growing regions of the United States,
|
||
two options for deployment of the refuge are available to growers.
|
||
The first option is planting a common refuge for both com borers and com rootworms. The
|
||
common refuge must be planted with com hybrids that do not contain Bacillus thuringiensis
|
||
(B.t.) technologies for the control of com borers or com rootworms. The refuge area must
|
||
represent at least 20% of the grower's com acres (i.e., sum ofMON 863 x MON 810 acres
|
||
and refuge acres; refuge area must contain 20 acres of com for every 80 acres ofMON 863 x
|
||
MON 810 com planted). It can be planted as a block within or adjacent (e.g., across the
|
||
road) to the MON 863 x MON 810 field, perimeter strips (i.e. strips around the field), or in
|
||
field strips. Ifperimeter or in-field strips are implemented, the strips must be at least 4
|
||
consecutive rows wide. The common refuge' can be treated with an insecticide to control
|
||
rootworm larvae and other soil pests. The refuge can also be treated with a non-B.t. foliar
|
||
insecticide for control of late season pests if pest pressure reaches an economic threshold for
|
||
damage; however, if rootworm adults are present at the time of foliar applications then the
|
||
MON 863 x MON 810 field (acres) must be treated in a similar manner. Economic
|
||
thresholds will be determined using methods recommended by local or regional professionals
|
||
(e.g., Extension Service agents, crop consultants, etc.). A schematic of one common refuge
|
||
deployment option is shown below:
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
Common Refuge
|
||
MON863xMON
|
||
810 Corn (80 ac)
|
||
(
|
||
[
|
||
Refuge: J Non-B.t. Corn
|
||
(20 ac)
|
||
The second option is planting separate refuge areas (e.g., two refuge areas, a double refuge,
|
||
paired refuge areas) for com borers and com rootworms. The com borer refuge must be
|
||
planted with com that is not a lepidoteran-protected B.t. hybrid, must represent at least 20%
|
||
of the grower's com acres, and must be planted within Y2 mile of the MON 863 x MON 810
|
||
field. The com borer refuge can be treated with an insecticide for com rootworm larval
|
||
control, or a non-B.t. foliar-applied insecticide for com borer control if pest pressure reaches
|
||
an economic threshold for damage.
|
||
The com rootworm refuge must be planted with com that is not a com rootworm-protected
|
||
B.t. hybrid, but can be planted with B.t. hybrids that control com borers. The com rootworm
|
||
refuge must represent at least 20% of the grower's com acres (i.e., corn rootwoim refuge
|
||
must contain 20 acres of corn for every 80 acres of MON 863 x MON 810 corn planted) and
|
||
can be planted as a block within or adjacent to the MON 863 x MON 810 field, strips around
|
||
the field; or in-field strips. The com rootworm refuge can be treated with an insecticide to
|
||
control rootworm larvae and other soil pests. The refuge can also be treated with a non-B.t.
|
||
foliar insecticide for control of late season pests; however, if corn rootworm adults are
|
||
present at the time of foliar applications then the MON 863 x MON 810 field must be treated
|
||
in a similar manner. A schematic of one separate refuge option with the com rootworm
|
||
refuge planted as a block within the field and the corn borer refuge planted within a Y2 mile
|
||
of the MON 863 x MON 810 field is shown below:
|
||
|
||
/"'
|
||
( (
|
||
Separate-Refuge Option
|
||
{Two-Refuge Option, Double-Refuge Option, Paired-Refuge Option}
|
||
MON 863 xMON
|
||
810 Corn
|
||
(80 ac)
|
||
r
|
||
Refuge:
|
||
Corn borer
|
||
protected corn
|
||
(20 ac) .....
|
||
::SYz mile
|
||
,.- J Refuge:
|
||
Non-B.t. Corn
|
||
'- (25 ac)
|
||
Corn/Cotton Growing Area (Cotton Growing Area) Refuge Requirements
|
||
For MON 863 x MON 810 com grown in cotton growing areas of the U.S. the common
|
||
refuge and separate refuge options (e.g., two-refuge options, double-refuge options, paired
|
||
refuge options) are also available, however, the refuge area is larger. Cotton growing areas
|
||
include the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North
|
||
Carolina, Mississippi, South Carolina, Oklahoma (only the counties of Beckham, Caddo,
|
||
Comanche, Custer, Greer, Harmon, Jackson, Kay, Kiowa, Tillman, and Washita), Tennessee
|
||
(only the counties of Carroll, Chester, Crockett, Dyer, Fayette, Franklin, Gibson, Hardeman,
|
||
Hardin, Haywood, Lake, Lauderdale, Lincoln, Madison, Obion, Rutherford, Shelby, and
|
||
Tipton), Texas (except the counties of Carson, Dallam, Hansford, Hartley, Hutchinson,
|
||
Lipscomb, Moore, Ochiltree, Roberts, and Sherman) Virginia (only the counties of
|
||
Dinwiddie, Franklin City, Greensville, Isle of Wight, Northampton, Southampton, Suffolk
|
||
City, Surrey, and Sussex), and Missouri (only the counties of Dunkin, New Madrid,
|
||
Pemiscot, Scott, and Stoddard).
|
||
The first option is planting a common refuge for both com borers and com rootworms. The
|
||
common refuge must be planted with com hybrids that do not contain B.t. technologies for
|
||
the control of com rootworms or com borers. The refuge area must represent at least 50% of
|
||
the grower's com acres (i.e., refuge must contain 50 acres ofnon-B.t. com for every 50 acres
|
||
ofMON 863 x MON 810 com planted). It can be planted as a block within or adjacent to the
|
||
MON 863 x MON 810 field, strips around the field, or in-field strips. Ifperimeter or in-field
|
||
strips are implemented, the strips must be at least 4 consecutive rows wide. The common
|
||
refuge can be treated with an insecticide to control rootworm larvae and other soil pests. The
|
||
refuge can also be treated with a non-B. t. foliar insecticide for control of late season pests if
|
||
pest pressure reaches an economic threshold for damage; however, if rootworm adults are
|
||
present at the time of foliar applications thenthe MON 863 x MON 810 field must be treated
|
||
in a similar manner. A schematic of one common refuge deployment option is shown below:
|
||
(u
|
||
/
|
||
13
|
||
|
||
Common Refuge
|
||
MON 863 x MOl' Refuge:
|
||
810 Corn (50 ac) . Non-B.t. Corn
|
||
(50 ac)
|
||
The second option is planting separate refuge areas (e.g., two refuge areas, double refuge
|
||
areas, paired refuge areas) for com borers and comrootworms. The com borer refuge must
|
||
be planted with com that is not a lepidopteran-protected B.t. hybrid, must represent at least
|
||
50% of the grower's com acres (i.e., must contain 50 acres of com for every 50 acres of
|
||
lepidopteran-protected com planted), and must be planted within 12 mile of the MON 863 x
|
||
MON 810 field. The com borer refuge can be treated with an insecticide for com rootworm
|
||
larval control, or a non-B.t. foliar-applied insecticide for com borer control If pest pressure
|
||
reaches an economic threshold for damage. Economic thresholds will be determined using
|
||
methods recommended by local or regional professionals (e.g., Extension Service agents,
|
||
crop consultants, etc.).
|
||
The com rootworm refuge must be planted with com that is not a rootw6rm-protected B. t.
|
||
hybrid, but can be planted with B.t. hybrids that control com borers. The com rootworm
|
||
refuge must represent at least 20% of the grower's com acres (i.e., com rootworm refuge
|
||
must contain 20 acres of com for every 80 acres of MON 863 x MON 810 com planted) and·
|
||
be planted as a block within or adjacent to the MON 863 x MON 810 field, strips around the
|
||
field, or in-field strips. The com rootworm refuge can be treated with an insecticide to
|
||
control rootworm larvae and other soil pests. The refuge can also be treated with a non-B.t.
|
||
foliar insecticide for control of late season pests; however, if rootworm adults are present at
|
||
the time of foliar applications then the MON 863 x MON 810 field must be treated in a
|
||
similar manner. Schematics for two separate-refuge options with the com rootworm refuge
|
||
planted as a block within the MON 863 x MON 810 field and the com borer refuge planted
|
||
as a block within a 12 mile of the MON 863 xMON 810 field are shown below:
|
||
1\
|
||
/""
|
||
I,)
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
Separate-Refuge Option
|
||
{Two-Refuge Option, Double-Refuge Option; Paired-Refuge Option}
|
||
MON863xMON
|
||
810 Corn (80 ac)
|
||
[ , Corn borer
|
||
protected corn
|
||
(20 ac)
|
||
-
|
||
MON863xMON
|
||
810 Corn (80 ac)
|
||
.....
|
||
[ Corn borer
|
||
protected corn
|
||
(20 ac)
|
||
~Y2 mile
|
||
--'"
|
||
- or - .
|
||
~Y2 mile
|
||
..
|
||
~
|
||
Non-B.t. Corn
|
||
(100 ac)
|
||
MON863 Corn
|
||
(80 ac)
|
||
[ Non-B.L corn'
|
||
(20 ac)
|
||
--'"
|
||
Grower agreements will specify that growers must adhere to the refuge requirements that will
|
||
be described in the Technology Use Guide (IRM Guide) for MON 863 x MON 810 com or
|
||
other applicable product use documents. Growers who fail to comply with the IRM
|
||
requirements risk losing access to the product.
|
||
These refuge requirements do not apply to seed propagation of inbred and hybrid com seed
|
||
up to total qf 20,000 acres per county and up to a combined U.S. total of 250,000 acres per
|
||
PIP active ingredient per registrant per year.
|
||
|
||
( (
|
||
CORN INSECTS CONTROLLED OR SUPPRESSED
|
||
Field com has been genetically transformed to produce the B.t. CrylAb and Cry3Bbl
|
||
proteins for the control or suppression of the following lepidopteran and coleopteran insects,
|
||
respectively:
|
||
European com borer (Ostrinia nubilalis)·
|
||
Southwestern com borer (Diatraea grandiosella)
|
||
Southern cornstalk borer (Diatraea crambidoides)
|
||
Sugarcane cornstalk borer (Diatraea saccharalis)
|
||
Com earworm (Helicoverpa zea)
|
||
Fall armyworm (SpodopteraJrugiperda)
|
||
Stalk borer (Papaipema nebris)
|
||
Western com rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera)
|
||
Northern com rootworm (Diabrotica barberi)
|
||
. Mexican com rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera zeae)
|
||
MON 863 x MON 810 is a product of Monsanto's research program offering unique genetic
|
||
characteristics for specific grower needs and may be protected by one or more of the
|
||
following U.S. Patents: 5,023,179,5,110,732,5,352,605,5,424,412, 5,484,956, 5,859,347,
|
||
5,593,874,6,063,597,6,174,724,6,331,665" 6,501,009, 7,064248 and 7,231,056.
|