Create SKILL.md
New Skill: stakeholder-influence-mapper
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: stakeholder-influence-mapper
|
||||
description: Maps stakeholders for a product decision and produces a tailored
|
||||
influence strategy with draft talking points. Use when user needs to "get
|
||||
alignment", "build consensus", "get buy-in from engineering or finance or legal",
|
||||
"present to stakeholders", or "navigate organisational resistance".
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
author: Mohit Aggarwal
|
||||
version: 1.0.0
|
||||
category: stakeholder-communication
|
||||
tags: [stakeholders, influence, communication, alignment]
|
||||
documentation: https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Stakeholder Influence Mapper Skill
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
Turn a product initiative into a structured influence plan — who needs to be
|
||||
aligned, in what order, and exactly what to say to each person in their language.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Inputs
|
||||
- Initiative description (what you want to do and why)
|
||||
- List of key stakeholders involved (name, role, relationship to initiative)
|
||||
- Timeline pressure (when do you need a decision?)
|
||||
- Any known objections or political context
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
1. Build stakeholder map with: role, primary concern, decision authority
|
||||
(blocker / influencer / informed), current stance (supportive / neutral /
|
||||
resistant / unknown)
|
||||
2. Identify the critical path of conversations — who must be won before others
|
||||
3. For each stakeholder, lead with their concern, not your ask
|
||||
4. Prepare one likely objection per stakeholder and a prepared response
|
||||
5. Flag any stakeholders who should NOT be approached until others are aligned
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Stakeholder Map: [Initiative Name]
|
||||
|
||||
| Stakeholder | Role | Primary Concern | Authority | Current Stance |
|
||||
|-------------|------|-----------------|-----------|----------------|
|
||||
| [name] | [role] | [concern] | [type] | [stance] |
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommended Conversation Sequence
|
||||
1. **[Name first]** — because [reason they unlock others]
|
||||
2. **[Name second]** — once [first] is aligned
|
||||
[continue...]
|
||||
|
||||
### Talking Points by Stakeholder
|
||||
|
||||
#### [Stakeholder Name]
|
||||
**Lead with:** [Their concern, not your feature]
|
||||
**Your ask:** [One specific thing you need from them]
|
||||
**Likely objection:** [What they'll push back on]
|
||||
**Prepared response:** [How to address it without being defensive]
|
||||
**What success looks like:** [What alignment from them looks like]
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- Never send the same message to all stakeholders — calibrate every time
|
||||
- Engineering leads want technical feasibility acknowledged first
|
||||
- Finance stakeholders want ROI framing before anything else
|
||||
- Legal/compliance stakeholders want risk mitigation addressed upfront
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user