Claude
572b8acf8c
Make the library multi-platform without duplicating content. Each skills/<name>/SKILL.md body remains the single source of truth; a new generator renders platform-ready exports from it. - scripts/build-exports.mjs — dependency-free Node generator with a PLATFORMS registry so new platforms (Gemini, Cursor, …) are a few lines. Ships ChatGPT exports at exports/chatgpt/<bundle>/<skill>/SYSTEM_PROMPT.md (172 skills), plus generated index READMEs. Supports --platform and --check. - exports/ — generated ChatGPT system prompts, ready to paste into a Custom GPT. - .github/workflows/check-generated.yml — fails a PR if exports or web/skills.json drift from the source skills. - README "Works With" now documents the ready-to-use exports and regen command. - CHANGELOG + SKILL-AUTHORING-STANDARD note the generated artifacts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016JWn5jRD5tcEFKrubjQ6Px
72 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
72 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# NDA Analyser Skill
|
|
|
|
NDAs are often treated as routine paperwork but contain terms with significant long-term consequences. This skill analyses them systematically.
|
|
|
|
## Required Inputs
|
|
- **NDA text** (paste in full or describe key clauses)
|
|
- **Your party position** (disclosing / receiving / mutual)
|
|
- **Purpose of the NDA** (e.g. pre-sales, hiring, M&A, partnership)
|
|
- **Industry context** (optional)
|
|
|
|
## Output Structure
|
|
|
|
### 1. NDA Type and Parties
|
|
- **Type:** Unilateral / Mutual
|
|
- **Disclosing party:** [Name]
|
|
- **Receiving party:** [Name]
|
|
- **Purpose:** [As stated]
|
|
- **Governing law:** [Jurisdiction]
|
|
- **Term:** [Duration of obligations]
|
|
|
|
### 2. Definition of Confidential Information
|
|
- **How broadly defined?** Narrow / Standard / Very broad
|
|
- **Oral disclosures included?** Yes / No / With conditions
|
|
- **Standard exclusions present?** [public domain, prior knowledge, independently developed, legally required disclosure]
|
|
- **Flag:** [Unusual inclusions or missing exclusions]
|
|
|
|
### 3. Key Clause Analysis
|
|
|
|
**[Clause name] — Concern / Watch / Standard**
|
|
- **What it says:** [Plain English]
|
|
- **Issue:** [Why flagged]
|
|
- **Standard position:** [What this typically looks like]
|
|
- **Negotiation suggestion:** [If applicable]
|
|
|
|
Clauses always covered: permitted use, non-solicitation/non-compete, term and post-termination obligations, return/destruction of information, remedies, liability, residuals clause.
|
|
|
|
### 4. Negotiation Checklist
|
|
|
|
| Point | Current position | Suggested ask |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| [e.g. Confidentiality term] | [e.g. 5 years] | [e.g. Reduce to 2 years] |
|
|
|
|
### 5. Plain English Verdict
|
|
2-3 sentences. Standard NDA, one-sided, or needs a lawyer?
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
WARNING: This analysis is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor before signing.
|
|
|
|
## Quality Checks
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Definition of confidential information assessed for scope (narrow / standard / very broad)
|
|
- [ ] Residuals clause checked (allows memory use of disclosed information — high-risk)
|
|
- [ ] Non-solicitation / non-compete provisions flagged
|
|
- [ ] Post-termination obligations duration noted
|
|
- [ ] Plain English verdict given (standard / one-sided / needs lawyer)
|
|
- [ ] Disclaimer is included
|
|
|
|
## Anti-Patterns
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Do not present the analysis as legal advice — the disclaimer must appear prominently and the output must recommend qualified legal review before any signing decision
|
|
- [ ] Do not skip the residuals clause check — residuals clauses allow the receiving party to use disclosed information from memory, which is one of the highest-risk provisions in any NDA
|
|
- [ ] Do not evaluate only the clauses explicitly flagged by the user — a complete analysis must cover all standard clause types even if the user only asked about one
|
|
- [ ] Do not assess breadth of the confidentiality definition without checking for oral disclosure coverage — oral disclosures with no written confirmation requirement are a common enforcement gap
|
|
- [ ] Do not omit the plain English verdict — a clause-by-clause analysis without a summary conclusion leaves the user unable to act on the findings
|
|
|
|
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
|
- "Analyse this NDA"
|
|
- "Review this confidentiality agreement"
|
|
- "Is this NDA standard or unusual?"
|
|
- "What should I negotiate in this mutual NDA?"
|