mohitagw15856
f3b9d008fe
New skills added: - teaching-lesson-plan: structured lesson plans for any subject/audience/setting - seo-content-brief: complete SEO briefs with intent, competitor gaps, and outline - media-pitch: story-first journalist pitches with angle development framework - change-management-plan: stakeholder analysis, comms strategy, adoption metrics - workshop-facilitation-guide: activity instructions, decision protocols, facilitator moves - sales-forecasting-model: pipeline model, scenario analysis, assumption log - tax-planning-checklist: year-end tax planning across income, pension, CGT, reliefs Quality improvements across all 93 existing skills: - Standardised description format: "Verb the thing. Use when X. Produces Y." - Added Required Inputs section to all skills missing it (prompts for missing info) - Added Quality Checks section to all skills missing it (specific, not generic) - Fixed broken multiline YAML descriptions - Removed non-standard frontmatter keys (tool_integration, metadata blocks) README updated to v6.0.0 with 100-skill count, new skill tables, and article series Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
57 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
57 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: roadmap-narrative
|
|
description: "Transform a prioritised initiative list into a compelling strategic roadmap narrative. Use when asked to write a roadmap narrative, explain the product roadmap to non-technical stakeholders, connect roadmap items to company goals, or produce an exec-shareable roadmap story. Produces a themed narrative with strategic context, quarter progression arc, an executive summary, and a 'what's not on the roadmap' section."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Roadmap Narrative Skill
|
|
|
|
Convert a ranked list of product initiatives into a clear, strategic narrative that connects individual items to company goals and communicates a coherent product direction.
|
|
|
|
## Required Inputs
|
|
|
|
Ask the user for these if not provided:
|
|
- **Prioritised initiative list** (with rough timelines or quarters)
|
|
- **Company OKRs or strategic priorities** (to connect roadmap to company goals)
|
|
- **Audience** (all-hands, board, investors, sales team — changes tone and depth)
|
|
- **Items explicitly NOT on the roadmap** (optional but strengthens credibility)
|
|
|
|
## Process
|
|
1. Review the prioritised initiative list and company OKRs provided
|
|
2. Identify 2-3 strategic themes that group the initiatives naturally
|
|
3. For each theme, articulate: the problem it addresses, the customer it serves, the metric it moves
|
|
4. Write a quarter-level narrative that shows progression — how does H1 set up H2?
|
|
5. Draft an executive summary (3-4 sentences max) that non-technical stakeholders can repeat
|
|
6. **Validate** — Confirm every initiative maps to a theme. If an initiative is orphaned, either create a theme or flag it as a narrative gap to address
|
|
|
|
## Output Structure
|
|
|
|
### Product Roadmap: [Quarter/Half/Year]
|
|
**Strategic Context:** [1 paragraph: market moment, key challenge, our response]
|
|
|
|
#### Theme 1: [Theme Name]
|
|
- Strategic rationale
|
|
- Initiatives included
|
|
- Primary metric impacted
|
|
- Dependencies
|
|
|
|
[Repeat for each theme]
|
|
|
|
**What's Not on the Roadmap (and Why):**
|
|
[2-3 items with rationale — shows strategic discipline, not just prioritisation]
|
|
|
|
**Executive Summary (shareable):**
|
|
[3-4 sentences that could be shared in an all-hands or board update]
|
|
|
|
## Tone Guidelines
|
|
- Write for a CFO, not an engineer
|
|
- Lead with customer outcomes, not features
|
|
- Be honest about what's NOT on the roadmap and why
|
|
|
|
## Quality Checks
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Every initiative in the input maps to a strategic theme
|
|
- [ ] The executive summary can stand alone and be repeated correctly after one reading
|
|
- [ ] Progression narrative shows causal links between quarters (not just chronological listing)
|
|
- [ ] "What's not on the roadmap" section includes at least 2 items with clear rationale
|
|
- [ ] Language throughout is free of engineering jargon — tested by asking: "could a CFO repeat this?"
|