54f76456ab
Signature features that turn breadth (174 skills) into a differentiated product: - Workflow recipes: 5 cross-profession chains (workflows.json) that pass each output forward — slash commands (/ship-a-feature etc.), WORKFLOWS.md generated by scripts/build-workflows.mjs, README + MCP (list_workflows/get_workflow) wired - Eval-backed quality: real per-skill scores from evals/results.json surfaced as badges in the playground and an honest README section (6 scored skills) - One-click MCP: 'claude mcp add' install + workflow tools, works in any MCP client - Playground: 'which skill?' recommender, with/without compare toggle, shareable ?skill= deep-links with prefilled inputs - Sample-output gallery: hand-written examples for the hero five + generator (scripts/build-samples.mjs) + web/examples.html - Skill-of-the-week: scheduled workflow + script that composes X/LinkedIn posts and posts to an optional webhook Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
18 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
18 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: Workflow recipe — go from a vague opportunity to validated insight and a prioritised next step by chaining 4 skills.
|
|
argument-hint: [the opportunity or fuzzy question]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Run the **Run Discovery** workflow recipe for: $ARGUMENTS
|
|
|
|
This is a *chain* of skills. Run each stage in order and **carry every stage's output forward as context** for the next. Open with a one-line plan of the 4 stages, then ask once for any essential missing inputs (who the users are, what's prompting this, any constraints). Don't re-ask between stages.
|
|
|
|
Run each stage under a clear `## Stage N — <name>` heading:
|
|
|
|
1. **Frame it** — apply the `ambiguity-resolver` skill to turn the fuzzy opportunity into a one-page problem brief with a scoped question.
|
|
2. **Plan the research** — apply the `discovery-interview-guide` skill to build a screener and discussion guide for user interviews.
|
|
3. **Synthesise** — apply the `user-research-synthesis` skill to turn findings into themes and validated insights. (If no real findings exist yet, produce a synthesis template to fill in after interviews.)
|
|
4. **Decide what's next** — apply the `rice-prioritisation` skill to rank the resulting opportunities into a defensible next step.
|
|
|
|
Do not invent research findings — if interviews haven't happened, say so and produce the structure to capture them. End with a 4-bullet **"What you now have"** recap.
|