mohitagw15856
f3b9d008fe
New skills added: - teaching-lesson-plan: structured lesson plans for any subject/audience/setting - seo-content-brief: complete SEO briefs with intent, competitor gaps, and outline - media-pitch: story-first journalist pitches with angle development framework - change-management-plan: stakeholder analysis, comms strategy, adoption metrics - workshop-facilitation-guide: activity instructions, decision protocols, facilitator moves - sales-forecasting-model: pipeline model, scenario analysis, assumption log - tax-planning-checklist: year-end tax planning across income, pension, CGT, reliefs Quality improvements across all 93 existing skills: - Standardised description format: "Verb the thing. Use when X. Produces Y." - Added Required Inputs section to all skills missing it (prompts for missing info) - Added Quality Checks section to all skills missing it (specific, not generic) - Fixed broken multiline YAML descriptions - Removed non-standard frontmatter keys (tool_integration, metadata blocks) README updated to v6.0.0 with 100-skill count, new skill tables, and article series Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
73 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
73 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: contract-review
|
|
description: "Review and summarise any contract or legal agreement. Use when asked to review a contract, check an agreement, flag legal risks, or summarise key clauses. Produces a structured review with key terms, flagged clauses, risk rating, and plain English summary. Not a substitute for qualified legal advice."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Contract Review Skill
|
|
|
|
This skill produces a structured contract review identifying key terms, unusual or high-risk clauses, and a plain English summary. Always include the disclaimer that this is not legal advice.
|
|
|
|
## Required Inputs
|
|
- **Contract text or description** (paste or describe)
|
|
- **Reviewer role** (e.g. the party signing, their legal team, a business owner)
|
|
- **Contract type** (e.g. SaaS agreement, employment contract, NDA, supplier contract)
|
|
- **Key concerns** (optional — e.g. "focus on IP ownership and termination clauses")
|
|
|
|
## Output Structure
|
|
|
|
### 1. Contract Overview
|
|
- **Type:** [Contract type]
|
|
- **Parties:** [Party A and Party B]
|
|
- **Effective date / duration:** [If stated]
|
|
- **Governing law:** [Jurisdiction]
|
|
- **Overall risk rating:** Green Low / Amber Medium / Red High
|
|
|
|
### 2. Key Terms Summary
|
|
|
|
| Term | Detail |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Payment / fees | |
|
|
| Term and renewal | |
|
|
| Termination rights | |
|
|
| Liability cap | |
|
|
| IP ownership | |
|
|
| Confidentiality | |
|
|
| Dispute resolution | |
|
|
|
|
### 3. Flagged Clauses
|
|
|
|
For each flagged clause:
|
|
|
|
**[Risk level] — [Clause name]**
|
|
- **What it says:** [Plain English summary]
|
|
- **Why it matters:** [Risk or implication]
|
|
- **Suggested action:** [Negotiate / Accept / Seek legal advice / Query]
|
|
|
|
### 4. Missing Clauses
|
|
List any standard clauses absent but normally expected for this contract type.
|
|
|
|
### 5. Plain English Summary
|
|
3-5 sentences. What does this contract mean for the party signing it?
|
|
|
|
### 6. Recommended Next Steps
|
|
- [Action 1]
|
|
- [Action 2]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
WARNING: This review is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a qualified solicitor or lawyer before signing any legally binding agreement.
|
|
|
|
## Quality Checks
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Overall risk rating is justified (not just "Medium" without reasons)
|
|
- [ ] All flagged clauses have a specific recommended action (not just "read this")
|
|
- [ ] Missing clauses section is completed for this contract type
|
|
- [ ] Plain English summary can be understood by a non-lawyer
|
|
- [ ] Disclaimer is included
|
|
|
|
## Example Trigger Phrases
|
|
- "Review this contract: [paste]"
|
|
- "Flag the key risks in this agreement"
|
|
- "Summarise this SaaS contract in plain English"
|
|
- "What should I watch out for in this supplier agreement?"
|