bfdbec17a3
Two star milestones shipped together: Customer Success bundle (pm-cs) — 250-star milestone: - cs-health-scorecard: weighted RAG health score across 5 dimensions with renewal forecast - qbr-deck: slide-by-slide QBR structure with value narrative and mutual commitments - cs-escalation-brief: 4-level escalation framework with root cause, impact, and decision required - churn-analysis: voluntary/unavoidable churn split, early warning signals, prioritised interventions Engineering expansion (pm-engineering) — 500-star milestone: - cicd-playbook: full pipeline playbook from build through post-deploy checks and rollback - slo-error-budget: SLI definitions, burn rate alerts, and error budget policy - developer-onboarding-doc: first-week guide covering architecture, setup, testing, and contacts - oncall-runbook: per-alert response procedures, escalation matrix, and handoff template Also: - Added pm-cs plugin to marketplace.json - Updated pm-engineering plugin.json to v3.0.0 (14 skills) - Updated marketplace.json to v10.0.0 (114 skills, 23 bundles, 16 professions) - README updated with new CS section, corrected skill numbering (106 → 114) - Added bug report link to Contributing section - Star milestones updated to show 250 and 500 as unlocked
177 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
177 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: cs-escalation-brief
|
||
description: "Write a structured escalation brief for an at-risk customer account. Use when an account has escalated, when a customer is threatening churn, when a P1 customer issue needs executive attention, or when preparing an internal save play. Produces a crisp escalation brief with account context, timeline, root cause, business impact, and a clear resolution plan."
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Customer Escalation Brief Skill
|
||
|
||
Produce a clear, concise escalation brief that gives internal stakeholders — VP CS, CCO, product leadership, or the CEO — everything they need to understand the situation, make decisions, and act fast.
|
||
|
||
A good escalation brief is not a complaint. It is a professional document that states the facts, assigns accountability honestly, and proposes a specific resolution plan.
|
||
|
||
## Required Inputs
|
||
|
||
Ask for these if not already provided:
|
||
- **Account name**, tier, and ARR
|
||
- **CSM name** and account owner
|
||
- **Nature of the escalation** — what happened, what the customer is saying
|
||
- **Timeline** of events leading to escalation
|
||
- **Customer contact** who escalated (name, role, influence level)
|
||
- **What the customer wants** — their stated ask
|
||
- **What we believe the root cause is**
|
||
- **What has already been done** to address the situation
|
||
- **Renewal date** and current renewal risk assessment
|
||
|
||
## Escalation Levels
|
||
|
||
Calibrate urgency and audience based on escalation level:
|
||
|
||
| Level | Trigger | Audience | Response time |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| L1 — Account Risk | Customer expressing dissatisfaction; renewal at risk | CSM + CS Manager | 24 hours |
|
||
| L2 — Executive Escalation | Customer escalated to their exec; requesting vendor exec involvement | VP CS + Account Exec | 4 hours |
|
||
| L3 — Churn Risk | Customer has issued notice or is in active churn conversation | CCO / CEO + Revenue leadership | 1 hour |
|
||
| L4 — Public Risk | Customer threatening public escalation, legal, or press | CCO / Legal / Comms | Immediate |
|
||
|
||
## Output Format
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Escalation Brief: [Account Name]
|
||
|
||
**Escalation level:** L[1/2/3/4] — [Label]
|
||
**Date raised:** [Date]
|
||
**Raised by:** [CSM name]
|
||
**Escalation owner:** [Name of exec or senior stakeholder now leading response]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Account at a Glance
|
||
|
||
| Field | Detail |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| ARR | £/$/€[X] |
|
||
| Tier | Enterprise / Mid-Market / SMB |
|
||
| Customer since | [Date] |
|
||
| Renewal date | [Date] — [N] days away |
|
||
| Renewal risk (pre-escalation) | Green / Amber / Red |
|
||
| Renewal risk (current) | Green / Amber / Red |
|
||
| Customer contact who escalated | [Name, role, seniority] |
|
||
| Executive sponsor (customer) | [Name, role — active / passive / vacant] |
|
||
| Executive sponsor (vendor) | [Name, role] |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## What Happened — Summary
|
||
|
||
[3–5 sentences. State the facts plainly. What the customer experienced, how they reacted, and how we learned about the escalation. No editorialising. No blame.]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Timeline
|
||
|
||
List in chronological order. Each entry: `[Date / time] — [What happened. Who did what.]`
|
||
|
||
Include:
|
||
- When the original issue or trigger event occurred
|
||
- When the customer first raised concerns (informally)
|
||
- When it escalated (formal escalation or exec involvement)
|
||
- Actions taken since escalation
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Root Cause
|
||
|
||
**Primary cause:** [One clear sentence. What specifically went wrong.]
|
||
|
||
**Contributing factors:**
|
||
- [Factor 1 — be honest about internal failures as well as external ones]
|
||
- [Factor 2]
|
||
|
||
**Is this a systemic issue or isolated?**
|
||
[ ] Isolated to this account
|
||
[ ] Pattern seen in other accounts — details: [_______]
|
||
[ ] Product or process gap that needs fixing
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Customer's Stated Position
|
||
|
||
**What the customer says happened:** [Their version of events — fair and unfiltered]
|
||
|
||
**What they are asking for:** [Their explicit ask — compensation, fix by date, exec call, SLA credit, exit clause]
|
||
|
||
**Sentiment of escalating contact:** [Frustrated but constructive / Angry / Seeking exit / Unknown]
|
||
|
||
**Risk of public escalation:** Low / Medium / High — [evidence if Medium or High]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Business Impact
|
||
|
||
| Impact type | Detail |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| ARR at risk | £/$/€[X] |
|
||
| Potential churn probability | [X]% |
|
||
| Reputational risk | Low / Medium / High |
|
||
| Reference / case study status | [Was a reference — now at risk / Not a reference] |
|
||
| Expansion pipeline at risk | £/$/€[X] |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## What Has Been Done So Far
|
||
|
||
1. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]
|
||
2. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]
|
||
3. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]
|
||
|
||
**Has a formal apology or acknowledgement been issued?** Yes / No
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Proposed Resolution Plan
|
||
|
||
**Immediate actions (next 24–48 hours):**
|
||
|
||
| Action | Owner | By when |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] |
|
||
| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] |
|
||
|
||
**Medium-term actions (next 2–4 weeks):**
|
||
|
||
| Action | Owner | By when |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] |
|
||
|
||
**What we are NOT offering:** [Be explicit about what is not on the table — avoids misaligned expectations]
|
||
|
||
**Success criteria:** [How will we know the escalation is resolved? What does the customer need to confirm they are satisfied?]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Decision Required from Escalation Owner
|
||
|
||
[State clearly what decision or resource the escalation owner needs to provide. Be specific — do not make them ask. E.g.: "We need approval to offer a 20% service credit for Q2" or "We need an exec call with [name] within 48 hours."]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Communication Plan
|
||
|
||
| Audience | Message | Channel | Owner | By when |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| Escalating customer contact | [Summary of message] | Email / Call | [Name] | [Date] |
|
||
| Customer exec sponsor | [Summary] | Call | [Name] | [Date] |
|
||
| Internal CS team | [Summary] | Slack / Meeting | CS Manager | [Date] |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Quality Checks
|
||
|
||
- [ ] Root cause is specific — not "communication breakdown" or "product gap" without detail
|
||
- [ ] Customer's position is stated fairly — not minimised or dismissed
|
||
- [ ] A clear decision is requested from the escalation owner — brief does not end with "what do you think?"
|
||
- [ ] ARR at risk is quantified
|
||
- [ ] Communication plan has owners and dates — not "TBD"
|
||
- [ ] Language is professional and blameless toward individuals
|