mohitagw15856
f3b9d008fe
New skills added: - teaching-lesson-plan: structured lesson plans for any subject/audience/setting - seo-content-brief: complete SEO briefs with intent, competitor gaps, and outline - media-pitch: story-first journalist pitches with angle development framework - change-management-plan: stakeholder analysis, comms strategy, adoption metrics - workshop-facilitation-guide: activity instructions, decision protocols, facilitator moves - sales-forecasting-model: pipeline model, scenario analysis, assumption log - tax-planning-checklist: year-end tax planning across income, pension, CGT, reliefs Quality improvements across all 93 existing skills: - Standardised description format: "Verb the thing. Use when X. Produces Y." - Added Required Inputs section to all skills missing it (prompts for missing info) - Added Quality Checks section to all skills missing it (specific, not generic) - Fixed broken multiline YAML descriptions - Removed non-standard frontmatter keys (tool_integration, metadata blocks) README updated to v6.0.0 with 100-skill count, new skill tables, and article series Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
54 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
54 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: retro-analysis
|
|
description: "Analyse sprint delivery data and produce a structured retrospective brief. Use when asked to run a retrospective, analyse sprint data, prepare a retro brief, or turn sprint metrics into discussion prompts. Produces a data-grounded retrospective brief with completion stats, pattern analysis, Start/Stop/Continue prompts, and one concrete experiment for next sprint."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Retrospective Analysis Skill
|
|
|
|
Generate a data-grounded retrospective brief that separates facts from feelings, so the team spends retro time on solutions rather than debating what happened.
|
|
|
|
## Required Inputs
|
|
|
|
Ask the user for these if not provided:
|
|
- **Sprint tickets: planned vs. completed**
|
|
- **Carry-over tickets and reasons** (if known)
|
|
- **Tickets reopened after closing** (quality signal)
|
|
- **Any incidents or unplanned work** (scope creep signal)
|
|
- **Sprint velocity vs. historical average** (trend context)
|
|
|
|
## Process
|
|
1. Calculate: completion rate, carry-over rate, unplanned work percentage
|
|
2. Identify patterns: which ticket types were most likely to carry over? Which caused blockers?
|
|
3. Note any process or communication breakdowns visible in the data
|
|
4. Prepare 3 "Start / Stop / Continue" prompts based on the data — not generic, specific to this sprint
|
|
5. Suggest 1 concrete experiment for the next sprint based on the biggest friction point
|
|
6. **Validate** — Confirm each prompt is specific to this sprint (not a recycled generic prompt), and that the recommended experiment is concrete and measurable
|
|
|
|
## Output Structure
|
|
|
|
### Sprint [Number] Retrospective Brief
|
|
|
|
**By the Numbers:**
|
|
- Planned: [n] tickets | Completed: [n] | Carry-over: [n] | Completion rate: [%]
|
|
- Unplanned work: [n] tickets ([%] of capacity)
|
|
- Velocity: [points] vs. [average] average
|
|
|
|
**What the Data Suggests:**
|
|
[2-3 observations grounded in the numbers above]
|
|
|
|
**Discussion Prompts:**
|
|
- Start: [specific prompt based on this sprint's data]
|
|
- Stop: [specific prompt based on this sprint's data]
|
|
- Continue: [specific prompt based on this sprint's data]
|
|
|
|
**Suggested Experiment for Next Sprint:**
|
|
[One concrete, testable process change — with a specific success metric]
|
|
|
|
## Quality Checks
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Each Start/Stop/Continue prompt names a specific behaviour, not a vague category
|
|
- [ ] The recommended experiment is testable in one sprint
|
|
- [ ] Carry-over analysis identifies the ticket type or cause, not just the count
|
|
- [ ] Data observations don't assign blame — they describe patterns
|
|
- [ ] Velocity trend is mentioned in context (is this a one-off or a pattern?)
|