mohitagw15856
f3b9d008fe
New skills added: - teaching-lesson-plan: structured lesson plans for any subject/audience/setting - seo-content-brief: complete SEO briefs with intent, competitor gaps, and outline - media-pitch: story-first journalist pitches with angle development framework - change-management-plan: stakeholder analysis, comms strategy, adoption metrics - workshop-facilitation-guide: activity instructions, decision protocols, facilitator moves - sales-forecasting-model: pipeline model, scenario analysis, assumption log - tax-planning-checklist: year-end tax planning across income, pension, CGT, reliefs Quality improvements across all 93 existing skills: - Standardised description format: "Verb the thing. Use when X. Produces Y." - Added Required Inputs section to all skills missing it (prompts for missing info) - Added Quality Checks section to all skills missing it (specific, not generic) - Fixed broken multiline YAML descriptions - Removed non-standard frontmatter keys (tool_integration, metadata blocks) README updated to v6.0.0 with 100-skill count, new skill tables, and article series Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
63 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: rice-impact-matrix
|
||
description: "Score features using RICE and plot against strategic alignment for nuanced prioritisation. Use when asked to prioritise features, build a priority matrix, combine quantitative scoring with strategic fit, or decide what to build next with multiple competing initiatives. Produces a scored priority matrix with RICE scores, strategic alignment ratings, quadrant placement, and sequencing recommendations."
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# RICE + Strategic Alignment Skill
|
||
|
||
Produce a prioritisation output that balances quantitative RICE scoring with qualitative strategic fit — because the highest RICE score isn't always the right next bet.
|
||
|
||
## Required Inputs
|
||
|
||
Ask the user for these if not provided:
|
||
- **List of initiatives or features to prioritise** (names and brief descriptions)
|
||
- **Current strategic priorities or OKRs** (needed to rate strategic alignment)
|
||
- **Reach estimates** (users affected per quarter — even rough estimates work)
|
||
- **Effort estimates** (person-months — from engineering if available)
|
||
- **Quarter or planning period**
|
||
|
||
## Two-Stage Process
|
||
|
||
### Stage 1: RICE Scoring
|
||
- Reach: Users affected per quarter
|
||
- Impact: 3/2/1/0.5/0.25 scale
|
||
- Confidence: 100% / 80% / 50%
|
||
- Effort: Person-months
|
||
- RICE = (R × I × C) / E
|
||
|
||
### Stage 2: Strategic Alignment Score
|
||
Rate each initiative against your current strategic priorities (provided as input):
|
||
- Directly supports top OKR: +3
|
||
- Supports secondary OKR: +2
|
||
- Neutral: +1
|
||
- Contradicts strategic direction: -1
|
||
|
||
### Final Priority Score
|
||
Combined Score = RICE Score + (Strategic Alignment × 10)
|
||
|
||
**Validate** — Flag any initiative where RICE score and strategic alignment conflict sharply (e.g., high RICE, low alignment). These require an explicit team conversation before sequencing.
|
||
|
||
## Output Structure
|
||
|
||
### Priority Matrix — [Quarter]
|
||
| Initiative | RICE Score | Strategic Alignment | Combined Score | Quadrant | Recommendation |
|
||
|------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------|----------|----------------|
|
||
| [name] | [score] | [score] | [combined] | [Now/Next/Later/Drop] | [action] |
|
||
|
||
#### Quadrant Definitions
|
||
- **Now:** High RICE + High Strategic Alignment → Build this quarter
|
||
- **Next:** High RICE + Lower Alignment → Queue for next quarter
|
||
- **Later:** Lower RICE + High Alignment → Revisit when capacity allows
|
||
- **Drop:** Low RICE + Low Alignment → Remove from backlog
|
||
|
||
#### Recommendations
|
||
[Top 5 initiatives with rationale for sequencing]
|
||
|
||
## Quality Checks
|
||
|
||
- [ ] All RICE components have an estimate (even if low confidence — flag those)
|
||
- [ ] Strategic alignment is rated against specific OKRs, not general "feels strategic"
|
||
- [ ] Conflicts between RICE rank and strategic alignment are explicitly flagged
|
||
- [ ] "Drop" recommendations are specific — not just "low priority, deprioritise"
|
||
- [ ] Confidence levels on estimates are noted where weak (drives the 50% confidence flag)
|